>>6586

Hello Lads! I think I just figured out how to solve for (prime) a. I followed the hints VQC gave me, and found something pretty damn cool. Anons, please compare these two set of records and tell me what you "c".

I "c" our c value in (-f,1) , and when I subtract it from the similar a[t] value in (e,1) i get 287-280 = 7 = prime a

>>6588

>>6589

Isee I’m following your post, and it looks completely solid. I see what you did, and it works! (For this example??)

We start at the nb transform, then move to d[t-1]=201

201- 16 (correct prime d)= 185

Then you do bn=222 -185= our prime b value of 37.

Am I following correctly?