PMA / CA - whoot! Awesome translation to the diagrams. Will review this eve.

VA, thanks for the blessed bread.

>>5867

Check your f formula?

f = 2 * d + 1 - e =63

and f2 = 61.

>>5877 I see now, didn't check the calc, ha.

>>5873 interesting CA.

Just saw this glancing at tail of general research. (see pic)

>>>/qresearch/1349267

Hmmmmm. Maybe because WL knows RSA is broken?? Once the public finds out, stocks such as RSA Securities are going to tank quickly.

>>5925 not sure Isee, good to see you.

Thought he had changed, but it was PMA:

>>5649

>>5648

Topo asked about it, and also noted that both trips had the same UserID, so I didn't worry after that (in Fermat thread), but would be good to have VQC clear it up:

>>5900

>>5941 Taught exactly same thing!

>>5942

Thanks, will think this through.

>If I pick a grid cell at position t within that cell, how would I pick another cell with a (x+n) square the same size?

Do you mean a "grid element at position t"?

>>5960 nice formula extensions!

>>5965 superb, you're all caught up and moving this forward!

>>5966 Makes perfect sense! Go on…

>>5959 Good illustration on the overlap.

(AA - might not give feedback, but have read and digested all of your posts).

>>5969 nice 'steps' Isee, makes perfect sense and is coherent with the crumbs.