3DAnon !!!YmM2NGExNzVlMDQ2 ID: 45f639 May 28, 2018, 3:19 p.m. No.6186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6189 >>6195 >>6213

>>6178

Thanks for this, helped a great deal in getting my triangles in a row!

>>6185

>Anons have got much further in six months than I would have. I would have walked away in frustration back in the day but you anons here have been amazing.

Not for lack of helpful nudges - glad you're still with us. This is really exciting stuff and we're not going anywhere.

>The solution to this problem introduces a new form of algebra where two concurrent forms of equations run side by side and then merge.

>What could it look like?

>Many new solutions often seem obvious in hindsight.

>The two forms of equations that merge together handle staircase numbers where the base of one staircase, is one unit longer than the other.

Does this sound like differential equations to anyone else? Too obvious right? Just a coincidence I was reading up on them last week I'm sure… any way to combine those with say, a tree structure for the second form?

 

>Take some time to think what this will look like and how the diagrams (especially animated) might show this.

Got some working diagram code going, should be able to crank out fancy animations tomorrow. Here is a sneak preview of {63:1:63:7:56:72} to {63:58:63:45:18:224} in downward steps, for constant d.

3DAnon !!!YmM2NGExNzVlMDQ2 ID: 45f639 May 28, 2018, 6:23 p.m. No.6197   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6195

Right? I should quit this P=NP stuff and start making screensavers instead!

Glad you like them - not even sure what happened in the last one but I did save the code. Some people here can probably extrapolate what order my triangles are arranged in just from those images.

Just don't count anything as accurate yet and we'll be fine, will check things before I start generating animations

3DAnon !!!YmM2NGExNzVlMDQ2 ID: 45f639 May 28, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.6205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6206

>>6200

Welcome!

I don't know what happened to my 3D code but its generating some pretty cool shit now even with the buggy versions…

3DAnon !!!YmM2NGExNzVlMDQ2 ID: 45f639 June 13, 2018, 12:26 p.m. No.6340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6344

>>6328

We found a spare key? Holy shit. Love this! Thank you!

>>5887

>triangles WITHIN triangles

>>>/qresearch/1715593

>BIGGER

>>6328

>large number

Why use RSA100 and biginteger functions as the first example? What patterns are we missing by looking at the smaller values?

If one key is enough to open a lock, how many keys do we need to see the lock? Make a bigger lock?

 

Records for RSA100

Anonymous ID: 45f639 June 13, 2018, 3:03 p.m. No.6343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6373

>>6341

Poasting this puts both the borad and mayself at risk. The ka yes have been found multipales of time by different groups in chans of blorks and all trices of this material and anons in-volved wipers - evrywheretime.

Aboot as moch as write or imager wothout trigging stuff.

Save'em while you can (!), and find somewhere else for this discussion as we can't continue on here. Suggest not reposting unedited copies anywhere. No further replies from mao on the subject, good luck (and sorry guys for bringing this here, the obfuckscation only works for a while…)