>>5995

Another "fun" thing regarding this.

Compute a cell (cell_0) with (x+n) odd and n even and d even.

Then create a new cell with a = n, b = 2*d + n, with n and d from cell_0 and call this cell_1.

x+n from cell_1 is equal to d from cell_0. And the difference between d/2 - x is the same as n - d/2.

Sorry for derailing a bit, I know this stuff belongs back in thread #8-9, but I haven't noticed this pattern before.

>>6009

It's quite nice the way these cells are connected.

Take cell_0 and add (x + n). This is cell_1's d.

Take cell_1 and add (x + n). This is cell_0's d.

>>6011

Let's hope so! My head is currently stuck on this, so I'll keep playing a bit with it before I go back to the triangles.

>>6014

The grid is kind of hilarious in a devious sense.

We know that for some numbers, the d of c is equal to the (x+n) of (x+n) of c, but as far as I know, we don't know anything but e and (x+n). It's like the numbers we want is always out of reach. But just by inches.