I'm pretty sure that's what he's saying, yeah. It was in his very first post about the grid, and I don't think anyone ever looked it up. It could be very useful to look into. Also, assuming you're the same person who would always leave the name field blank, welcome back baker!
>Archive Anon Anon
Heh
>Note that a[t] at (-f,1) is related to d[t] at (e,1) and is keyed by the value of d for a particular c. The value of f is determined by d. Since d contains a+x, this is the key.
The d value will obviously be the same for (e, n) and (a,b)=(1,c). That's the only instance of being able to calculate a[t] at (-f,1) straight from c that I can think of (the (-f,1) of (a,b)=(1,c)). So either there's direct correlation between that cell and (e,n) or there's some kind of relationship between them that in some way I can't think of directly relates to (e,n). The only thing I can think of is that maybe a[t] in (-f,1) and d[t] in (e,1) scale together in some way that lets us isolate x. I have no idea. I'll have a look in a few hours.
So how are you finding that they're 24 apart? I'm not quite sure what you're doing.