>>6324

Good stuff :)

>>6260

I need to clarify these notes for anybody looking in the future: I made the assumption that, as 'j' increased, 'c' would increase as well—or at least that was my thought process as I wrote these. In truth, it's the opposite: as 'j' increases from 0 to (i - 1), 'c' decreases because 'c' is a difference of the squares (i^2 - j^2).

It's irrelevant to what's happening in this thread. For all I know it could be irrelevant to what happened in any thread.

>>6339

Interesting–I'd noticed the sort of diagonal lines of entries in the grid, but hadn't thought of graphing using different elements for the axes.

I'm sure all of you have noted that they've managed to get the first layer of encryption off of three (or four) of Assange's insurance files. I really wish we could see some video of him somewhere safe–even though there has been indication that he's made it to the US, I would feel better if I saw him in some new video, preferably with some American landmarks behind him.

Regardless, the result of taking off the first layer is basically another impenetrable glob file. Clearly, this is something that anons have been working on for awhile–check this archive out:

https://archive.fo/yLPie

In that archive, you'll see a number of interesting references. One of them is to an early JA project called "rubberhose":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubberhose_(file_system)

As I understand it, the idea is that a hard drive is filled with randomized data, then each classified item (which he calls 'aspects') is broken into pieces and spread randomly on the drive. There is no indication as to the size of the original files, so they're impossible to get at in anything but a piecemeal manner.

Anons have been finding all kinds of hints and clues in the blockchain, but I can't help but think that what we're doing here might have relevance at some point soon. For instance–what if the relevant parts are spread according to the patterns VQC is teaching us here? Were that the case, then the elite would have been able to actually see what's in the files and know Julian Assange wasn't bluffing.

>>6343

msg received, ty

>>6373

I like that trip better, I'm switching. Establish tie to old one

>>6374

Hello VQC, thank you for everything you're sharing :)

Forgive me if this has already been covered–I don't remember seeing it, but I could be wrong.

Check this out:

I remembered seeing a Twitter hint from VQC which mentioned a 3-4-n triangle. I haven't found any instances of those, but I have found others.

I noticed that, besides the main horizontal and vertical lines, the clearest one was the one running along the hypotenuse of the purple triangle–it follows a pattern of two cells to the right, one cell down, and continues strongly until it ends at the vertex of said triangle. The angle from horizontal would therefore be arcTan(1/2).

Of course, there are other lines in the image; looking over it, certain things seem to pop out. I thought I saw that 3-4-5 triangle formed by the ends of other lines–it turned out that it was another one with length ratios of 1-2-sqrt(5). So I drew it out…and started to realize that there were similar relationships all over the place.

The lines are drawn along either part, or the entirety of, trend lines of filled cells. The vertexes represent where those trends end. The numbers marking the triangles are there to denote ratios of length. I haven't actually worked this out mathematically, and you can see that the drawings are a little off, but it was close enough that I'm pretty sure there's something there.

I'm not really sure how all this relates–rather than take things slowly, I just started looking for patterns and messing with it. One thing seems certain–if you have one number, and you know that you need another from a particular line, it should just be a few simple calculations to get to the one you want.

Perhaps 'n' is somehow related to the distance between the two numbers?

I've got more work to do. Hope this helps.

>>6545

oops, this one shows more.

>>6546

Sorry, last post for now I promise.

I just wanted to note two things: first, if you're looking for a 3-4-5 triangle, you can probably find one in there. Pic related shows one in green.

Another thing: along the top line, you see a 4 and a 10; I wonder if were to double the settings, might we come up with a larger pattern that reaches 20–with this one embedded in it and repeating?

More work to do…

I think I found another lead :)

I was looking up th LLL algorithm when this one came up; apparently it's much more efficient. Pic related is from the second website I checked. Sound familiar?

http://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/pi-algorithm.html

>>6660

Ugh, my trip code is wrong here. Srry, I post from multiple devices and browsers, and I don't have the code cached on this device.

Not like anyone is going to impersonate me, but w/e. The other trip I've been using is still my official one.

>>6661

Here's the algorithm. How we apply it is another matter…

I wonder where that 'gamma = sqrt(4/3)' comes from?

>>6660

Here's the rest of that article. Does nobody think this is significant? The fact that there is an algorithm that can pluck out any digit of pi, without having to calculate all of the previous ones, shows two things:

a) that the digits aren't random at all–rather, they're part of a pattern that can be calculated

b) that VQC is right, in that our underlying understanding of mathematics is fundamentally flawed.

Any claim that VQC is a LARP is now dead, as far as I'm concerned. This may well prove that the whole category of "Irrational Numbers" will have to be renamed. I suggest they be renamed "Chris' Numbers" or "Roots of David."

>>6664

𝛾 is randomly chosen. I've found a website that describes the algorithm and its use in relatively simple terms, and provides demonstration materials in the form of Mathematica notebooks:

http://arminstraub.com/math/pslq-intro

The .pdf into is attached.