VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: ee2270 June 14, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.6353   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6354

>>6351

Also, I think your understanding of negative f is correct, and ties back into the original code for the Grid.

 

I have a question about this record you posted:

>As an example, we find {2:1:5:2:3:9:2} in row 1, where a=3 and t=2. f=-9, so if we take (-9,0,2), we get {-9:0:6:3:3:9:2}

The a and b records make a c val of 18. When I run the values out, I can't make them match with d and e. Is it possible that there's a bug in your code? Or maybe I'm missing something?

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: ee2270 June 14, 2018, 9:29 p.m. No.6359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6360 >>6367

>>6356

Thanks AA! We are currently using a slightly different notation. Quick rundown on the working notation we're currently using:

 

Location summary is (e,n,t)

Element summary is {e:n:d:x:a:b}

 

This will make it much easier for us to follow along with PMA's examples and GIF's, and help us find their locations in the Grid too.

 

My Original Post is lacking, since I'm a new baker! If any Newer anons have questions, check the OP's in the earlier threads bc there are some really helpful diagrams that explain the difference of squares equation and the Grid.