>>6894

You are my hero AA. Get some rest man!

So I have been thinking about this distribution problem and I see it like this.

Assumptions:

1. Chris is not working with/for Q. He is independent but still on the side of the "good guys".

2. He does not know the best way to distribute this thing without hurting (and helping) a hell of a lot of people.

3. He is certain that the release will do more good than bad overall. (I deeply agree) and wants us to figure the details out.

The worse-case scenario is that the "Bad guys" (Think Hillary Clinton/Podesta/Pizzagate-tier bad guys) capture this tool and use it to crush what Trump is doing to fix the US and the world. If this thing is in the hands of just a few bad guys this is very possible, likely even.

Best case scenario is that we drop this thing in the right way. In a positive way that helps more than hurts people and the good guys use it to clear many of the bad things out of the system.

My guess is we will be somewhere in-between. See the movie “Sneakers” if you want a fun example of this exact problem. My voice is my passport, Verify Me!

The obvious target here is BTC. When I mentioned a one-click tool the reason I did was because this is easy to distribute to many people and would he hard hitting and attention getting. Most importantly though it could easily include the raw source code as well as the source files from this place compiled in text format so someone with a large enough brain could reproduce the work all in one package. It would be OUT. Think about the old keygen’s that were common in the software piracy days of the late 90s and early 0’s except you input a public key, hit generate and a private key pops out.

This would protect all of us from the men with the dead eyes, silenced pistols and blue gloves, which is very real risk going forward. Also it would make sure that no one could lock it up, which if you look into so many of these amazing inventions that have never come out is a very likely possibility that could happen. In fact, I think that is still the most likely possibility at this point. There will soon come a critical time where we must distribute far and wide or die trying. To simply squash BTC like a bug and post the code around may wipe cryptos from the face of the earth but that is just a tiny fraction of what is possible. A gnat buzzing around the ear of the elephant. What will be built and discovered with this tech is what really matters. THAT is what we are fighting for here weather we know it or not. Cryptos are simply a way to get there.

AA mentioned just making a script that rips all the bitcoin wallets to zero and sends the coins all to one wallet, essentially destroying the chain. Chris mentioned updating Wikipedia. I think the Wikipidia idea is VERY dangerous to alone. Definitely a way to get wacked in a hot-minute. It solves nothing at all related to distribution and puts up a gigantic bullseye on us all. I think that is the right move AFTER WE HAVE DISTRIBUTED THE CODE FAR AND WIDE. Wikipedia would be a good step-3 right there with Topol's Media release. Step 1 and step 2 though need to be more subtle and broader in scale. Step 1: This thing needs to be sent to people who UNDERSTAND what the hell we are doing here. This is tough for me because I barely understand what we are doing here but that is what needs to happen first. This means crypto-anarchists and netsecurity guys/math nerds at the academic level. Very shortly thereafter we need to use other broad distribution methods such as the BTC cracker I mentioned. Something that will be shared and shared far and wide. Something everyone would want and everyone would want to share. Bit Torrent as well as stuff like 'chan boards and social media. Lastly we drop the hammer and update Wikipedia/post all over social media.

I think a source of “People who understand this stuff” would be in the Net Security community as well is the crypto currency community. This could be done with a white paper. Then the BTC cracker, then the academic-tier Wikipedia release and official release to the media as Topol suggested. That is what I think is the best direction to go. What do you guys think?