Saga ID: eca9d4 Aug. 21, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.7349   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7347

Every one has his own thing, if anyone has time they will surely study your patterns. I currently am working on something of my own, and since I know a lot about it, I will choose to go down my way. It takes time to learn someone else's patterns and finds. If you have something useful, post it, if not, work on it some more. Key word here is "Improve on what you post."

 

Find, refine, post.

Saga ID: eca9d4 Aug. 22, 2018, 10:05 a.m. No.7358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7362 >>7364

>>7334

Kinda, but I found it nevertheless, its

ab/(a+b+c)

thing is, I want to find it using only c, is it possible? sometimes two pythagorean triplets can be found using one c, for instance:

 

16 63 65

33 56 65

 

are both valid for c = 65.