>>587

>ponyfags are so rare that there's no way there could be 4+ in one thread

>>593

if baker == vqc:

mind = blown

else:

print("meh")

>>597

Yay

>>596

>>611

>work on the vqc from the second thread on

>post a couple ponies

>everyone here are ponyfags now

mfw

>>613

sorry I'm a simple mud pony who can't into fancy grammar

>>615

>being this much of a n00b

>>617

>human tasks

You have a lot to learn

But anyway, this is derailing from studying the vqc

>>621

>>628

>>638

probably a derpibooru filename

>>640

lower half? if it's lewd then that explains why I cropped it when I made that one

>>642

I didn't make it

I did make this tho

>>669

nice digits

also, f is for negative e values

for a given solution e and d, d on the negative e side is d + 1 or the ceiling sqrt of c like you said

the f, or negative e is: solution e - (2*(solution d) + 1)

You can use this python code to generate the (e,1) elements for negative or positive e values:

>>123

>>673

That's what I'm trying to figure out. Every time I try using the negative elements in conjunction with the positive elements, they cancel out the same as they cancel out normally. There's still a pattern we're missing. I keep working it out on a whiteboard and now in mathematica. It just keeps providing no solution and it's annoying lol

>>676

Yes, and I have the equations and initial value generation code to represent both sides now