>>8157

I think I'm on board, at least partially. I just got to start exploring this though, so hold your thoughts a bit while I try and catch up.

I'm still not entirely on board with the M-function, mostly in the sense of using it with regards to the records, but like I said I'm exploring it and thinking about it. I'm getting now that with the QFT (Column 0, row 1 (?)) we should be able to find the period of the number we're after. This should allow us to compute Shor's algorithm.

In >>8148 is the fractal overlayed, as in two pictures one with a moving M over another stationary M?

>>8157

The images are something I made today, so they might not be accurate, but the first one should be M moving 2 times pr. frame while the second one is moving 8 times pr. frame, if I'm on board with the "jumping". However, neither are tied to a record, they're generated using M with x, y and offsets. (I went through a few tests before I figured out how to emulate the movement compared to the videoes you posted).

>>8161

Something interesting to note is how you can clearly see squares appear on the diagonal as the "beams" split.