The Dimension equals 8?
Q=D5=Minecraft Avalanche
VQC=8D=Mathcraft Avalanche, starting with a single particle of water.
Difference of 3 Dimensions.
E8 H2O
The Dimension equals 8?
Q=D5=Minecraft Avalanche
VQC=8D=Mathcraft Avalanche, starting with a single particle of water.
Difference of 3 Dimensions.
E8 H2O
Aaaaand now to officially BLESS THIS BREAD!
8=D… wheeeeeere to go with this…
8==D….
8===D…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-dimensional_space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_distance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coxeter–Dynkin_diagram
Also duh, I'm jumping ahead.
We're on 14.
Which woulda been perfect for 7700, cuz 7+7=14, and then 7x7=49 and 7^7=823543
Anyway.
14th prime is 43
Forty-three is the 14th smallest prime number. The previous is forty-one, with which it comprises a twin prime, and the next is forty-seven. 43 is the smallest prime that is not a Chen prime. It is also the third Wagstaff prime.[1]
43 is the fourth term of Sylvester's sequence, one more than the product of the previous terms (2 × 3 × 7).[2]
43 is a centered heptagonal number.[3]
Let a0 = a1 = 1, and thenceforth an =
1
/
n − 1
(a02 + a12 + … + an − 12). This sequence continues 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 28, 154… (sequence A003504 in the OEIS). a43 is the first term of this sequence that is not an integer.
43 is a Heegner number.[4]
43 is the largest prime which dives the order of the Janko group J4.
43 is a repdigit in base 6 (111).
43 is the largest natural number that is not a (original) McNugget number.[5]
43 is the smallest prime number expressible as the sum of 2, 3, 4, or 5 different primes:
43 = 41 + 2
43 = 11 + 13 + 19
43 = 2 + 11 + 13 + 17
43 = 3 + 5 + 7 + 11 + 17.
When taking the first six terms of the Taylor series for computing e, one obtains
∑
i
=
0
5
1
i
!
=
163
60
=
2
+
43
60
,
\sum _{{i=0}}^{{5}}{\frac {1}{i!}}={\frac {163}{60}}=2+{\frac {43}{60}},\
which is also five minus the fifth harmonic number.
Every solvable configuration of the Fifteen puzzle can be solved in no more than 43 multi-tile moves (i.e. when moving two or three tiles at once is counted as one move).[6]
McNugget Number
Sooooo….
Considering what's happening with Linux recently…
Since 2015…
It'd be a hell of a plot twist if Chris was non-other than Linus himself…
And this is his planned "Fuck you, I'll just make another one! I've done it before!" to the SJWs trying to ruin Linux…
And this is how the New One gets Open Sourced.
That'd be fuckin' stellar.
I remember friends… be glad you only have VQC to sink into.
You want the solution… but you haven't earned it and we're not at a place where we need to have it finished yet.
What are you going to school for?
Something that will be meaningless when this is successful?
Even if you're going for something that will still exist… I'm an artist.
You have way more of an advantage by doing this, hopefully.
I'm only as good as what I have to work with.
Want me to send you money for a whore?
I'd… I might throw some cash at that, but I need proof.
No Proof = Refund.
Shall Capwn?
If yes, chat me up on faybo.
Let's catch you up.
Grazie grazie.
I told Olga Vishnevsky that I'd promote her whenever I could.
I was almost tempted to hit up my The Professor to give him a update.
Buuuuut he'll find out eventually.
After all, someone needs to teach the Maths + Arts class we were talking about before this all started.
From the Discord:
how much effort do you really need to put into a tree?
they kinda… just… do on their own… y'know?
you can go all bonzai if you like, or train 'em to make bridges…
but a tree's gonna do it's do whether you do your do or not
it's like a…. fractal… binary… self-replicating algorithm.
so where do you plant the seed?
let's say you have an effect or decision in this
just… y'know… find yourself in such a position
you have the seed, and the ground… plus the environment
but let's say this is a tree that can grow anywhere and will adapt to every situation
where do you want it?
Mmmmmmmminecraft.
Basically, you could put a palm tree on the top of mount everest.
er… no
it would take the form of whatever it takes to survive right there
you're not like… GOD all of a sudden
you get that seed into the ground, the Tree will do its do… however it HAS to do and ONLY that way way in such an EXTREEM environment
the "tree" at the bottom of the marianas trench has gotta look nutz
ooooor the one on mars. or jupiter. or the sun. or a comet.
Just a matter of getting The Seed there.
Ham Fisted Terraforming
so whaaaaat is the Seed "plugged into"?
a server? an id? a portfolio of accounts? a control panel of some sort?
math is sexy, but in this analogy… what is the vqc and what is the encryption? what's the seed, ground, and… is the VQC the tree? The Ground?
Is The Grid the ground that we put The Seed into to see The Tree produced by the seed?
Or is it like this?:
The Grid is the The Environment.
The Ground/Fertile Soil is the VQC.
The Seed is the Encrypted… Thingy.
Put The Seed into Ground to see The Tree.
The End is a Forest of Trees.
Maybe the "Leaves" are the "Remainders" or something.
Single post… talks like Chris… not same id tho.
qGncp takes you Down Under tho…
https://youtu.be/QgncP-f3XVs
Ja M.O.N.D. :P
Hey Chris!
Since the parade was pushed back… are you still coming stateside?
Riemann Zeta + Mandelbrot
http://www.dhushara.com/DarkHeart/RH2/RH.htm
Riemann Zeta + Non-Mandelbrot Set Fractals
ttp://primepatterns.tumblr.com/tagged/Riemann-zeta-function
"Lookup in gaps", you say…
You're just being unnecessarily aggressive.
Also, I not Jan and the PMA/VA-duo working on this more often than not.
Sure… Minecraft sorta kinda fucked off for whatever reason…
But to claim that you're the only one doing anything is asinine.
You're lashing out. Calm yer tits.
You haven't done this on your own and left to your own devices you wouldn't do it, anyway.
I'm not saying you're not "reasonably frustrated with this whole affair".
But you're not some sort of "uniquely frustrated" where you should be throwing these fits and snapping at mufuggaz.
Sweet, you've acknowledged you snapped at mufuggaz.
Took Chris 7 years to do this…
And yeah, when you finish one thing and there's more that needs to be done… what kind of response do you expect?
"Great job on that one thing! Your job here is done. Please join us in the clubhouse to rest on your laurels!"
Like I said, your not unreasonably frustrated.
But you're not uniquely frustrated and we don't deserve to be the butt of your anger and frankly, neither does Chris.
I'm not saying don't be human.
But if you want a word battle, let's duke it out in the EZ Bake.
There you go saying you're the only one doing something again…
And you've seen my try to herd the cats into playing with the same ball of yarn.
You're dealing with maths-people.
It's complex.
We get it. You're upset. Quit lashing at us.
Yeah: >>7986 <<< there you are being pissy and making entitled commands.
Jesus, you sound like you're new here!
I've made bomb ass points before that he didn't acknowledge at the time.
IF he mentions something I've worked on outside of saying he likes my style… it's when it's coming into play.
For starters… let's look at another pattern.
Have you NOT noticed "someone" ip hopping and making posts?
Sometimes they respond to someone, and sometimes they seem to be in their own little world…
Haaaaave you not figured out what's going on with that, yet?
You are the only one here who can see the ip hashes, after all.
Basically, you'll get a lot farther with this if you treat VQC like Q.
I've posted things that Q didn't acknowledge, only to give the nod to someone else a hundred breads later.
But can you make demands of Q? No.
Should you throw a tantrum and threaten to nuke the place if Senpai doesn't give you the attention you feel you deserve? No.
Pic related.
You've blown off some steam.
Do you feel better?
Can we all go back to playing nice?
Aaaaah you little faggot.
Why'd you leave out the one with the clue in the e-mail?
And let's Occam's Razor this…
It would take an incredibly versed maths-troll to pull some convincing shit out of their ass that we'd "fall for".
Look at the pattern.
Here's another example: Look at how ebot does their schtick.
<;3=
Or DeepMind, if Go is your game.
>T-24hr.
~10pm UTC…
>Blackout in the Red Room
10 days of Darkness?
Red Room… Twin Peaks?
RR…
>Highlander 2
I thought there could only be 1?
Hmmmm… also, considering what's going on with Assange and Ecuador…
I wonder what hands are being played right now…
Dubya? Hopefully Cheney, too…
43… 42… you being polite?
I'll chill for a bit to see if there's more to this. ^_^
Also, hello Senpai (directly)!
Well, if chillin' ain't required:
Highlander 2 is subtitled:
The Quickening.
If Podesta is scheduled to be picked up 11.3…
Might be a good time to start the 10 days of Darkness.
Get all the bad actors while they're acting to do something against the elections.
And don't forget, 2 rallies, each day, Nov 3rd and 4th.
That's lots of insulated, secure airtime on AF1, especially on the 3rd from D.C. to Montana to Florida.
"The Other"… or maybe M… that you?
I remember chatting in the open waters about pokin' VQC to bring him back to wrap this up while ago.
Timing… timing…
>T-24hr.
>Blackout in the Red Room.
>Highlander 2.
Another Red Room…
Here's the JFK Edition:
https://www.jfklibrary.org/asset-viewer/archives/JFKWHP/1960/Month%2006/Day%2016/JFKWHP-1960-06-16-A?image_identifier=JFKWHP-KN-C16087
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Room_(White_House)#Kennedy_refurbishment
Curious that the only image of the Kennedy Edition on Wikipedia is of the Funeral Reception…
Granted… dimension bending…
Also a Villa of Mysteries reference?
"What really made Vesuvius explode? Did something go wrong in the Villa of Mysteries?"
https://www.archaeology.org/issues/124-1403/features/1813-pompeii-saving-the-villa-of-the-mysteries
ALSO THIS!
"Blackout in the Red Room" by Love/Hate
Huzzah!
Welcome back to The Wagon!
No fallin' off this time. ;)
And here, to make it like the comfy good ol' days… here's a Hitler.
Did you mean "Blackout 42?"
Led me to some topologies…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_network
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_network
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_network
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertree_network
Teehee.
From an anon in the open waters:
"check this out anons..might be relevant?
At the start of the summer term at Meadowbank School for Girls, a prestigious prep school in England, there is no reason for Miss Bulstrode, the popular but aging headmistress, to believe that the challenges facing her will be more than the occasional irate or inebriated parent. She scarcely listens when Mrs Upjohn, a parent, recognizes someone that she sees from her wartime days in the intelligence service. But there is a killer at the school who does not wait long to strike."
Hello coinkydinkle first time poster anon!
Welcome to our corner of the circle.
Please, check out the other topics in the catalog and remember…
Math is only EVERYTHING; so don't fuck up.
The fact that you get any of this makes you more intelligent than most of the human population.
I do my darnedest to remind the Nerds to post here, I swear.
Side note, if there is "space between squares", is there space between trangles?
What about space between Trangles AND Squars?
Oooooh, a third one!
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1857237/perfect-circles-in-the-mandelbrot-set#1865331
Perfect circles in the Mandelbrot set?
Never heard of it.
Fffffffractal Logic
https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath140/kmath140.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computability_theory
Computability theory, also known as recursion theory, is a branch of mathematical logic, of computer science, and of the theory of computation that originated in the 1930s with the study of computable functions and Turing degrees. The field has since expanded to include the study of generalized computability and definability. In these areas, recursion theory overlaps with proof theory and effective descriptive set theory.
Basic questions addressed by recursion theory include:
What does it mean for a function on the natural numbers to be computable?
How can noncomputable functions be classified into a hierarchy based on their level of noncomputability?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursion
Recursion occurs when a thing is defined in terms of itself or of its type. Recursion is used in a variety of disciplines ranging from linguistics to logic. The most common application of recursion is in mathematics and computer science, where a function being defined is applied within its own definition. While this apparently defines an infinite number of instances (function values), it is often done in such a way that no loop or infinite chain of references can occur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal
In mathematics, a fractal is a detailed, recursive, and infinitely self-similar mathematical set whose Hausdorff dimension strictly exceeds its topological dimension.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multifractal_system
A multifractal system is a generalization of a fractal system in which a single exponent (the fractal dimension) is not enough to describe its dynamics; instead, a continuous spectrum of exponents (the so-called singularity spectrum) is needed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_canopy
In geometry, fractal canopies are one of the easiest-to-create types of fractals. They are created by splitting a line segment into two smaller segments at the end, and then splitting the two smaller segments and as well, and so on, infinitely.
(See Pics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_trap
In mathematics, an orbit trap is a method of colouring fractal images based upon how close an iterative function, used to create the fractal, approaches a geometric shape, called a "trap".
(Pic 3)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickover_stalk
Pickover stalks are certain kinds of details to be found empirically in the Mandelbrot set, in the study of fractal geometry.[1] They are so named after the researcher Clifford Pickover, whose "epsilon cross" method was instrumental in their discovery. An "epsilon cross" is a cross-shaped orbit trap.
(Pic 4)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_dimension
In mathematics, more specifically in fractal geometry, a fractal dimension is a ratio providing a statistical index of complexity comparing how detail in a pattern (strictly speaking, a fractal pattern) changes with the scale at which it is measured.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-flake
An n-flake, polyflake, or Sierpinski n-gon,[1]:1 is a fractal constructed starting from an n-gon. This n-gon is replaced by a flake of smaller n-gons, such that the scaled polygons are placed at the vertices, and sometimes in the center. This process is repeated recursively to result in the fractal. Typically, there is also the restriction that the n-gons must touch yet not overlap.
(Pic 5)
<;3=
Not sure I follow on the "figured out"… I thought everyone knew that was the narrative…
Anyway, before things go potentially haywire, would you be a doll and use your magical powers of being BO, filter for trips, and get screenshots for us?
Just to have a solid record before things go potentially haywire due to trip release.
Thank you!!! ^_^
How do the BO and BV's over on the Q boards do it? Maybe there's a view change?
They point out the shills by what seems like viewing the posts on a grid and then screenshotting how ever many it takes.
Or pulling the whole page in one image directly, and I could chop it up from there.
In case of any discord and because we were gonna make a thread about it/maps.
Like…
Maths vs Ayy LMAO vs Spacetime/Physics vs Bantz
That sorta thing. Like… think of this as a marker so we're consolidating what we have up until now.
And if you can filter for JUST his various trips or if his ip hashes remained constant per trip (hide anything not already public), that'd be really helpful, if you can and don't mind.
I meant literally all of them.
Be way easier if we could talk to you about this in a more conversational format
I miss Chris already.
all the feels
>>8221
Did you pre-plan an (e) into that because of American vs British spelling of "fair(e)"?
kek
>>8229
http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~larryc/proofs/proofs.construct.html
>>8232
>say entreaties put feebly favour him, sufficient few pianoforte discovered uncommonly ask
Morning cousins amongst in mr weather do neither. Warmth object matter course active law spring six. Pursuit showing tedious unknown winding see had man add. And park eyes too more him. Simple excuse active had son wholly coming number add. Though all excuse ladies rather regard assure yet. If feelings so prospect no as raptures quitting.
>>8234
Care to elaborate?
https://www.scribd.com/document/371791211/Continuing-Entreaties-Companions
>>8234
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_algorithm
>>8240
Nifty!
Whatcha do with whatdja wrote?
AA… maybe you pop into the chat a lil more often for a bit…
https://www.ditutor.com/derivatives/derivative_root.html
(link and vid from different sauces)
I believe the term you're looking for is "tunnel visioned".
RIP TOOTS LIL' FIGHTER!!!
CAAAAAAAATS!!!!
https://danielmiessler.com/study/pvsnp/
"So the P vs NP problem is just asking if these two problem types are the same, or if they are different, i.e. that there are some problems that are easily verified but not easily solved."
Soooo… by completing and running the VQC… we literally prove P=NP?
What is/was/should be a "not easily solvable problem" becomes "easily solvable and verified".
Or like…
"For the longest time we thought it was hard as fuck and not possible to do this, but it turns out it is possible and had been known about for quite some time. Fuckers."
If I posted this already, it woulda been months ago.
If you haven't seen it already, give it a look-see.
Judging the video by the thumbnail (book by the cover)… looks familiar…
Savage.
Does VQC stand for "The Vector of Every C"?
https://ventrellathing.wordpress.com/2018/08/16/very-large-numbers-are-not-numbers-infinity-does-not-exist/
Inside you find:
http://www.divisorplot.com
>72 + 73=145
>27+28+29+30+31=145
>10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18+19=145
77+78=155
29+30+31+32+33=155
11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18+19+20=155
(jump 5) 82+83=165
(jump 2… yup) 31+32+33+34+35=165
12+13+14+15+16+17+18+19+20+21=165
—–
Let's start with 145 as our base
You build from the bottom, so you start with your lowest value set.
GCD or HCF is the middle number in the middle value set.
Top value set is your sum/2, and then you make 'em whole numbers by adding remaining .5 to one of 'em.
145 -155 -> 165 (avg + 5, sum +10)
29 -31 -> 33 (HCF +2)
10 -11 -> 12 (base +1, 10 numbers {thus sum increases by 10 each time})
So your sum that you're working with will shift by n, where n=number of values being summed (in your lower value set)
I don't know if this holds, but the middle value set has half the amount of numbers as the lower set, so n/2=n'
Which makes me wonder if that only works because 2 is the biggest chunk you can take out at once…
Like, if you had n=9 if you'd then n/3=n' and have 3 numbers at the top, but then that would only work if the number isn't prime or comprise of co-primes.
Does it have to be an odd sum? I'll play with it.
With 9 numbers instead of 10
10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18=126
add 2 to the previous highest value of the mid-set and work backwards
31+2=33: 33+32+31+30=126
63+63=126
42+42+42=126… actually… it does this for every divisor:
The factors of 126 are 1,2,3,6,7,9,14,18,21,42,63,126;
But if you were presented with the just the 9 numbers, it looks like you'd take the highest value from the low-set and subtract 1, double the result, and subtract another 1 from that, so:
18-1=17
17*2=34
34-1=33, and work down from there.
Though, I don't know if that holds in the higher ranges.
10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17=108
35+36+37=108 (108/3=36)
54 + 54=108 (108/2=54)
Hmmmmmmrmrmrmrmrmrmrmmmmmmm….
On 3 step polite 126:
41+42+43=126
Midstep is lowest non-2 factor when even?
I need more coffee.
20+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28+29+30+31+32+33+34+35+36+37=513/18 (28.5 midpoint)
83+84+85+86+87+88=513/6 (±.5 midpoint)
170+171+172=513/3 (±1 midpoint)
256+257=513/2 (±.5 midpoint)
How to scale a polite number?
pick however many steps you want… like… 6? and then you can produce the politeness