>>916

I wouldn't say special, it's to be expected. The problem is going from the A=1, B=C cell, to the factor cells. Dealing with the C^2 cell, this problem is ^2 as hard. We know the D=C, A=C,B=C cell, or the D=C, A=1, B=C^2 cell, but finding the factors is again, ^2 as hard.

>>919

It has more factors, but they're ^2 apart, with no way to find them.

We can step through factors by X–, A++, but again this is useless when C is the size of an RSA number. We need a magic way to predict N, or predict X.

>>926

This means the reverse is true? You can create an E,N from E,1? THAT'S huge.

Here's a view of (E,N,X) only showing the first cell in every cell. Honestly, I didn't expect this, and it's annoying.

You can't predict X with a given E and N.

>>937

The interesting bit is the in the cells you listed, A is a perfect square, and N is a perfect square * 2. Maybe because you used c=81?