I love seeing written notebooks. Path to the mind of your friend(s). No pressure, no rush. Just seeing a little bit higher on the planes of existence over here. Know you care about this quest. That's all. Love your input. Your intuition is usually right on. Appreciate your badass style of memes and knowledge. Love ya, Topol!
Agreed! Your idea is worth pursuing, to find the underlying formulas. Not trying to be a downer, or to dismiss your idea. Let's pursue it, Anon!
I asked VQC about i and j, and his response was "they are necessary to generate the grid, but remember that in a real case, you won't be given i or j, only c." I'll look thru the archives and see if I can find his post about this.
Here's another tasty crumb from VQC:
Well, this relates to the main problem we're trying to solve right now. Baker is correct, and you are correct too. Agreeing on terms would be helpful. With higher values of n, you could consider the first cell the "genesis cell". The only issue is we don't yet know n, and we're trying to solve for it starting only from c.
(e,1) or row one is "The one row to rule them all" according to VQC. We can generate all elements for any value of e in row one, using (for odd e at t=1) a=(e+1)/2 and (for even e at t=1) a=e/2. At (0,0) a=2. Then we solve for b and n at t=1, (e,1). Then we can build "Jacob's Ladder" or "Stairway To Heaven" in row one using the pattern of b at t=1 dropping to become a at t=2. So for row 1, we can create all elements into infinity. VQC said that "cells at (e,1) contain all factors for that entire column." So row one is our "Catalog of var a Values"? (Help me here if I'm wrong, anons.)
For column 0, my understanding is that as c increases to huge RSA numbers, n is also likely to increase to huge (but less than c) numbers. Our pattern of jumping up using c, cc, aa, bb , etc is to help us find the correct row of n for the c we are factoring. (help me here if I'm wrong, Anons). PMA, can you give us the Meta Idea of what c^2 factoring in Column 0 is hoping to accomplish? I think what I've stated is correct, but could be wrong too.
Thoughts, Anons?
Nice pattern and work CA! So, starting from only c, are we able generate x so we can follow the pattern? Or, saying it another way, given c, d, and e how do we generate x? We need var a to do it I think??? VQC keeps telling us to find factors of var a, since that is the key to deriving x. Thoughts?
Also, there is a clear pattern between n values and x values in column 0. Wanna take a crack at writing a formula for it, CA? PMA and I got n(1-6) figured out, and there is a clear pattern for odd n, and a clear pattern for even n. After (0,6) the pattern morphs, but there is still a clear relationship from n to x.
Agreed, MA. We've been banging our heads against the wall for two weeks or so. We have exhausted SO MANY possible incorrect solutions. We've honed the focus to generating var a for row 1, and also to understanding how c^2 values in column 0 multiply. CA, glad you're back! Here's VQC's recent posts about where to focus. TBH, we haven't figured it out yet. We're bonked, but still working to understand.
MA is correct when he said we are given c, d, and e. Next step is finding a. Then we can derive x, t, and b. Along with n as well, I think. The hard part is starting only from c. We need a way to tie together columns and rows.
Anons, what do you think about the n and x patterns in (0,n)? After n=6 they change, but still clearly related. Can we put all eyeballs on this pattern and try to find the equation?
And, since x is derived from d-x=a, we could also look for n*a patterns in (0,n), since these will tie directly to d and x patterns in (0,n) as well. Thoughts, Anons?
Baker, thank you. I think in the next few days I'll rework the archives i posted to include all rt's, just for proper records. Then in the following bread everything will be accurate. I was trying to keep it to math rt's but there are more goodies that I missed.
Sorry lads d-a=x fucking tired out over here. Too many late nights this week working on math(s). Yawn. Can't even post basic equations to make my point, lol!
Also, good thing AA moved us over here. CBTS main is nuts. Alex Jones show interviewed PamphletAnon and Baruch today, and millions of new truth seekers just found out about Q and the chans. CBTS is full of newfags and shills, and the Judicial Watch link for the Huma Abedin emails can't be reached, either under DDOS or too many requests. Q just went mainstream, lads!!! Victory To The Light!!! Let's keep our spirits up lads, and keep working for a solution. These evil fucks are gonna get justice. Let's do our part.
http:/ /www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/JW-v-State-Huma-Weiner-emails-00684-2.pdf
CollegeAnon ripping it up parabola style! I'll put fresh eyes on this tomorrow. So to clarify, you're saying var a moves in parabola form, and you've figured out how to calculate individual a values using your formulas? If so, that's dope as shit. Thanks for all your work!
Agreed, Baker. No love for famefags. I'm just tripping out that Q is going mainstream. My lady is talking with friends on FB about who Q is, ie Barron, Don Jr, etc. WTF!!! When 60 million eyes get put on Q's posts, the world will redpill itself. AJ is talking openly about Q, chans, etc. Time to FIRE UP THE MEME CANNONS, LADS! I can't believe I'm alive to be seeing this. WHEN we solve this (with Senpai help, of course! Thx Senpai) we are going to help fundamentally change the course of human history. We have green light to go mainstream and fucking blast FB, Twatter, et al. I've been waiting for this moment my whole life, never thought it could really happen. Truth and Justice. Make Earth Great Again!
>>1684
Yeah, thanks Baker! Can we get some more Victory ponies up in this??