Need to figure out the old clues before getting new clues. It's not enough to be given the answer.
Alright guys, here's my presentation on why T is a lie. This is N=1, with +E extending to the left. X is used as Y (T/height) variable. Very predictable results. The home row we've come to know and love.
Now this is N=2. This row is more complex, with gaps, and a sloped start to X. But this row is still quite predictable.
Now N=3. Now we have two new types of N. One is still evenly spaced, but spaced larger than before, and the other is two in quick succession, followed by a gap. Together, these make little macaroni noodles in the sky. The slope has also increased.
Now N=4. It has become angry by the assumption that it could behave well in a simple equation. Sure, there's a pattern. But it wants blood.
N=5. The Grid has become sentient and is plotting against you.
N=6. The Grid has taken the form of a fish. We're at 4 distinct patterns of X now.
The best I've been able to do so far is pinpoint X on N2, but pinpointing X on N3 is fucking hard because of the damn macaronis. You can use N2's X to approximate N3's X, but approximately in an exponential system is not very helpful.
Anyway, I guess if T is a real variable, it takes not only X, but E and N as inputs. Which somehow equal one. Then, only changing X by a variable amount, equals 2. Then changing it an different amount, equal 3.