>>1544

This is actually incredibly useful. It is incomplete though,

{0:8:5:4:1:25}=25

{0:9:8:6:2:32}=64

{0:16:10:8:2:50}=100

{0:18:7:6:1:49}=49

>>1549

More deviations at N24, N25, these are in the original output.csv I have. Baking you a custom order.

>>1557

I had a dream where my skin was covered in math scribbles.

>>1552

This is a very special view of (1,N). The initial value of X has been floored to zero, and the growth factor of X has been left intact. 8, 9, 24, 25, are marked in red.

Here's the normal view of (1,N) again. I'm focused on getting the initial value of X, if someone could find a formula for how X behaves after that, it'll be huge. The distances are small enough that it can be forced out, but moving thousands of N records, the formula is significant.

>>1572

My understand of E and F is this. E is the amount C is over it's perfect square root, F is the amount C is under the next perfect square root up (D+1). This is why the perfect square roots only fill E0, but they fill the inverted square roots in F. Every perfect square root can be a perfect square root under a different perfect square root.

>>1577

We also have the VQC bruteforcer that I figured out what was wrong with. The correct version is this.

ArbitraryCell(e, n, x){

e = e;

n = n;

x = x;

a = (x * x + e) / (2 * n);

b = a + 2 * (x + n);

c = a * b;

d = sqrt(c);

}

boolean isValid(){

return (c - d * d) == e;

}

You can generate any cell by any E,N,X and test if it's a good cell or not. Good for looking at very specific regions.

>>1578

Those two the are two patterns you identified. The sub patterns are the one's you missed. Did you tell your lady you're mathing to end the world?