>>1622

I'm guessing that's not a feature of twitter?

Slow day today. I just spent hours troubleshooting a bug where I was copying a reference of an old object rather than cloning it into a new object.

>>1639

-E is the F side, and is the difference C is under the ceiling of it's square root. ie, d+1

>>1665

Take the E, N, and X you get from your method, and use it to regenerate a new cell with this method. >>1579

How many of them are actually good?

>>1667

I mean, in the past handful of posts, you've posted like a hundred lines of code and formulas, and you're pretty sure it's good? And you can't even be bothered to check it with the RSA100 values? But we're supposed to?

>>1671

The problem with what you're doing is this. We know C, and thus D, and thus E. If we knew X, then A=D-X. Then, B=C/A; RSA factored in literally two operations.

You're working with a pattern that definitely exists, but is exactly what we're trying to avoid doing.