>>8679

Just a bit more time, not even a day. Have code compiling in visual studio.

Trying in another language with BMP.BigInt method and some passing test some not, need to review.

This week offers a special window.. so happy to follow along with others, don't let me hold anyone back!

>>8706

Just followed your guide in the thread you started. That and the help about the Main Program section addition was key. AA had something that helped too. Then played around.

Glad to help.

Maybe a version with 100(t), easy to navigate Base 100 excel rows.

>>8702

>>8708

>>8709

Always on topic with high relevance.

>>8699

Nice!

>>8713

>>8723

Pony up, Cowboy!

>>8720

Playing with larger numbers is in reach if you wish, relatively simply.

>>8730

Makes perfect sense. Recall you saying early on to multiply c by 5, and other numbers.

Here we go…

>>8736

Quick question: as we take c, and multiply by prime_small to get c', should we now be using a=1 for all cases for calculating e and other parameters?

>>8730

>Once the size of the product of small primes is larger than the root of c, when that product is multiplied by c, there is enough information to imply n.

Ok, so, once prime_small_1 * prime_small_2 * … prime_small_n sqrt(c);

Then (prime_small_1..n * c) = C

• or whatever we call it, is that our c' ?