Dead as usual with no semblance of a kept promise.
Still trust Chris?
Dead as usual with no semblance of a kept promise.
Still trust Chris?
One of the hints that was given when the tree structure was proposed was that it required factorising d and e
A factor of d is a factor of dd, much like if a or b had factors, they would be factors of c
A mathematical relationship
It is a spiritual position
If we were to look at an element that is d * d, a + b for that element would be (d + d), or 2d, and it would exist in (0, 0, d).
If they existed we would find subsequent factorisations in (0, n) where d[t] = d
If values that were not differences of squares were encountered, we would divide by two.
The goal of looking at column zero is modus tollens. You may have heard that term before.
(0, e)
(0, f )
Where d^2 is between in c[t]
(Which is also where d is between in d[t])
Comparing these elements to where d is between in d[t] in row one gives the solution