>We also know that the product of a and some values of q will appear before N'c' in [e',1] with one of the n' values.
And a'[t] = N'c' will appear in (e',1) where x=c'-d'. Coding a thing for this at the moment.
This picture shows the number of times a[t] in (e,1) is divisible by a vs the number of times a'[t] in (e',1) is divisible by a, as a proportion. So while there are obviously significantly more (for all the examples I tried there were 60 to 70 times as many divisible a'[t] values) since c'-d' is way bigger than c-d, it doesn't seem like a is any more or less likely to show up in (e',1).
I've also been checking for where n'a turns up in (e',1). It doesn't seem that a and any of the directly calculable n' values turn up together (the n' values you can calculate given you know the values used to produce q). I'm about to alter the code to show it for all n' values.
Wow, I just wasted an hour of my life looking for mod 1 rather than mod 0. Nice. Here's a picture confirming that a'[t]%(a*n')==0 turns up a whole bunch for known n' values between x=0 or 1 and x=c'-d' (18 for this example, 106 for another I tried, you get the point). Just to confirm and provide an example for >>8911 this post.
That sounds quite painful.
In case any lurkers are wondering why nothing is happening here at the moment, it's because of what Chris said >>9222 here about intentionally not giving us enough information. We're all waiting for him to come back (which may or may not happen before the end of June since Matariki is June 25-28 this year, but he has to actually stick to his dates for that to happen).
I'm pretty sure the Matariki star cluster is somewhere in this shitty photo, maybe in the light that wasn't captured (my camera isn't the best). I'm pretty sure I followed the directions from other constellations properly. Maybe this could coax Chris out of his posting hiatus.