Anonymous ID: 1b6b6e July 23, 2019, 11:12 a.m. No.9831   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9830

That would be very nice of you. Once Miller-Rabin is coded into the grid, if it happens before itโ€™s solved, it will be the simplest way to understand number theory in existence.

Anonymous ID: 1b6b6e July 23, 2019, 11:45 a.m. No.9834   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Complex roots of unity in the Miller-Rabin algorithm have consequence for the factors of the number that is being primality tested. Possible to formulate in terms of the grid?

Anonymous ID: 1b6b6e July 23, 2019, 3:12 p.m. No.9837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9850

But unless you find something special about calculating possible rows, (think I saw a variant of Pascalโ€™s triangle related to it), it wonโ€™t be the easiest way to decrease the search space

Anonymous ID: 1b6b6e July 23, 2019, 11:04 p.m. No.9847   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9848

>>9846

1 John 4:10

 

Deterministic Miller-Rabin test that relies on two hypotheses

Riemann hypothesis and a hypothesis that it is sufficient to test prime witnesses only to determine primality accurately

pastebin.com/wszQwN01

Anonymous ID: 1b6b6e July 23, 2019, 11:19 p.m. No.9849   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9848

Was only testing it on rsa primes and semiprimes when I uploaded this, apparently my natural logarithm function becomes too inaccurate when the numbers get vqc example sized

 

Iโ€™ll implement some precomputed witnesses tomorrow to change that

A temporary fix to make small examples accurate is change the variable m in ln from (3*(p/2)) to 8