>>997

Thanks for the thread!

Relevant, but not the maths. That thread will just get cleaner, then less anons pissed off and everyone happier.

Ya, lot's of chatter about fees as well, could be an Achilles heel. They've been going way up, users that used to pay less than a buck now see over $20 for a transaction fee. What kind of currency is that?

>>999

Fuckin' Checked!

Noted that, those are on the reading list, thanks for linking in here.

>>1002

I think that's a misleading graph when you normalize for time. A 93% drop over 6mo., or 86% over 5 quarters, versus 39% in what, less than a week? And I bet some want out but can't cause of frozen trading.

Sauce please??? That would indicate intent, perhaps to put the herd at ease, in effect saying - "stay calm, carry on, this has happened before and it was much worse."

Thoughts?

>>1006

Am not taking issue with the Y-axis, that makes sense.

It's the X-axis and % / unit time that is misleading. I don't think your rationalization holds for '$8400 just a month ago'. Not saying cooked, just "misleading".

Again, sauce? CONTEXT matters.

>>1010

Want. Only problem is the Clinton Console Kitty isn't wearing an ankle 'bracelet' for keeping track of your kitty wherever it may try to hide.

>>1009

Thanks. Interesting read, as well as the comments.

>>1054

Stabilized, people were buying on the dips. Should be interesting in coming days / weeks. One thing is this showed fragility of the exchanges.

>>1093

Ah, but don't people covet and worship regular currency? Why should it be any different?