kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 8:54 a.m. No.3518   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3520 >>3522 >>3526 >>4018 >>4103

>>3509

>>3513

 

welcome to baking woes from April/May. Bakers got hit hard by shills for that one.

 

seems like the only pastes that don't get fucked with are the A GUEST ones.

 

-t. bakes as A GUEST on pastebin; Have never had a pastebin account.

 

Never had a paste go missing (that I know of), either. I'm suspecting that it's the loophole in the "paste is not present" game. Because the shills also use A Guest, when they are fucking over bakers ;p

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 9:12 a.m. No.3525   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3527

>>3520

 

Thank you for this kind offer; I'll respectfully decline, as I have declined the offers for a BV slot from other boards, including /comms/.

 

It allows be to remain impartial for the anons. o7

 

>>3522

>i leave the titles off my paste. makes harder to find maybe?

their algo searches the entire paste.

 

Interesting to me is that I have a (A GUEST) pastebin mirror of my baking log's content, which says Q RESEARCH right in it, in red text. Still online afaik. Adds evidence to this baker's suspicion that the target was absolutely named bakers on pastebin, and they tried to do it so it looked like it was limited to the targeted bakers. Probably based on content trigger words in the notes themselves.

 

Because only the "baker accounts" reported problems, and it started to be ones known for their consistent baking style.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 9:21 a.m. No.3528   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3529

>>3527

>Likely driven by enemies complaining to paste also.

 

I would say largely driven by enemies:

 

Patebin provides the tools through API; this allows them to skirt legal responsibility because they are not the ones actually doing it, they just provide the support to those who are.

 

Which would make "craxy qanons going after pastebin" a convenient smear, if it had happened.

 

Anons were smarter than that though, as always.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 10:40 a.m. No.3545   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3549 >>4018 >>4103

>>3526

>but hadn't considered comms would need archived offline..need to look into that for myself.

kek, heard. If you look at my own record you'll end up seeing the implication that the chain of authorship wasn't really even a thing this baker paid much (read- any, effectively) attention to, until spring/summer 2020….

 

Literally the only reason mine is even present prior to 2020 is due to the grace of God keeping those particular old 8ch threads alive to present, only. I've since taken offline backups of my entire chain of authorship as it stands, now.

 

I'd even go so far as to advise any anon to do the same, if they choose to have it. Archiving offline goes both ways. If it's good enough for Q posts, kekbees will do it for themselves, too.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 10:55 a.m. No.3551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3552 >>3554 >>3556 >>4018 >>4103

>>3549

 

I'm using greenshot for individual post caps, and mozarchiver for log threads.

 

greenshot considerations:

none. use it to cap single poasts.

 

MozArchiver considerations:

-MAFF archives are literally renamed ZIP files that you can browse.

-Remember to expand all images before using mozarchiver on the page (this forces the archive to fetch the fullsize image and prevents offloding that to the onlie page).

-Make sure the name/tripcode field is empty before archiving a thread

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 1afe69 July 25, 2020, 10:59 a.m. No.3554   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3551

 

This is only good for very small boards, like /doughlist/; this will be time consuming and tedious for something like the /communityboards/. Not possible for something like /qr/ obv..