kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 7dac24 Aug. 26, 2020, 4:41 p.m. No.5210   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5211

>>5209

well, looking at it logically it looks like ENDCHAN WARROOM person got called out for shitty hashtags and got all butthurt over it.

 

So he got shit upon again for not listening to anons.

 

And this is after a baker put it in notes so he can fuck right off if he thinks he's gonna stir up baker drama again with this bullshit, he can answer to anons now.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 7dac24 Aug. 26, 2020, 5 p.m. No.5212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5214

>>5211

 

1) the post was given and asked for comment, which I gave, in this stream.

2) the point of contention you reference, to me is irrelevant.

3) because anons opinion about your choices is relevant

3) your handling of the situation as your avatar was also very relevant

4) I was reminding you that your problem is between yourself and anons, not any baker, based on your immature reaction to criticisms so far.

 

I have nothing further to say about this matter. Please do not play stupid with my responses, I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by even responding.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 7dac24 Aug. 26, 2020, 5:31 p.m. No.5215   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5214

 

you condescend to people, you treat people like shit, everyone has told you about it, and you are playing stupid eight now.

 

The convention is on, have a great day..

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 7dac24 Aug. 28, 2020, 11:24 a.m. No.5321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5323 >>5330

>>5268

 

You have no right to bitch at the anons in /qr/ about anything. If you've got a problem with a specific poster, then whatever.

 

Doing what you did was not becoming of any patriot.

 

You, as a third party visitor, should be accommodating their requests and directives, not the other way around.

 

Have a great day.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 7dac24 Aug. 28, 2020, 7:58 p.m. No.5324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5325 >>5331

>>5323

>so ur a second party visitor?

 

when kekbees bakes, they are baking as an individual anon with a chain of authorship, and doing it for anons. Anons get the final say in all of my bakes, and anyone can see that for themselves in the transparency of my notes.

 

I'm not representing a community, nor using any community board, to represent myself, either. Sooo. kek.

 

You'll end up finding out how long I've been in the fight too, but whatever.

 

>do you know about #Obidengate?

I've seen your contribution in question, and I've seen the back and forth over it in the big stream, and here.

 

Have you noticed that I'm not taking issue with your campaign, and and rather, questioning your delivery, which sucks? As you've already been advised elsewhere?

 

Because whether your campaign is good or not, is between you and the anons?

 

I'm telling you what I see, it's on you to decide whether to take the criticism or not. Because whether or not anons continue to put up with your arrogance, is also between you and anons.

 

I'm merely advising you of possible drama for you, and probably others here too. Because it smells a lot like what went on on some of the other community boards in the spring.

 

Have a great day o7