Anonymous ID: 17f272 Jan. 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. No.8715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8721

>>8714

>filibuster

 

If talking about Congress, wouldn't that also include a legal perspective?

And won't changing the law just prolong the 'filibuster' because it can take time?

 

As for things that prolong time by not drawing a conclusion or avoiding the point at issue (such as delaying things that don't improve), isn't it proven that continuing to clarify the problem also includes not presenting improvements or ideas?

 

I also think it will be an opportunity for the public to recognize it

Anonymous ID: 17f272 Jan. 20, 2026, 2:04 p.m. No.8717   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8718 >>8720 >>8721

>>8716

I think that using such MEME is useful for raising awareness of superficial problems

 

What I'm talking about is focusing on more fundamental issues, and I'm talking about ideas for making things even better

 

I think it's more efficient to RT things like that on Twitter, etc., because you can RT them with a single button, but I think this space is very efficient when you want to focus on deeper issues, and I don't think people who can't speak up because of the opinions and viewpoints of those around them have no reason to remain silent here