>even Anons aren't sure how to meme about the filibuster
right lol
still thinking on this one
NEW THREAD ADDED AND DOUGH UPDATED
Game Theory - Ty Anon
https://8kun.top/warroom/res/8670.html
pass the SAVE Act..
https://x.com/ScottPresler/status/2013590370035056682
Nuke the Filibuster - Pass along
>fundamental issues,
The fundamental issue is BOTH sides of the gov are the problem.
Solution: Remove them all
but for now, try to get normies to understand the effect the filibuster is having on america may be a good path to show
mr dem senator used the filibuster to block such and such.
Article.cap.link.researched
show the people why the filibuster is hindering progress may work, and then to pull memes from that may the route. or im completely off?
thoughts?
forgive am still low to mid level here.
Filibuster
>first we learn about removing the filibuste
I agree and have researched it a bit
simple majority is needed
>Are your talking about this in more than one sense?
I dont believe I am. I am speaking in the sense that the filibuster needs to be addressed as many are under the impression that To end a
Senate filibuster on most legislation, you need a "cloture" vote of 60 Senators to cut off debate
> clarifying the problem an effective method?
The problem is the filibuster can also be removed entirely by the majority party using the "nuclear option" (a simple majority vote to change Senate rules)
Thus not removing the filibuster itself but redefining its removal standards
>Ah, it looks like fun
thanks anon, a culmination of a few anons here. you may be one of them
>If talking about Congress, wouldn't that also include a legal perspective?
yes if we were indeed trying to remove it from ever occurring again, but I have a feeling this is just for adjusting the filibuster Stance on what is the Majority
>And won't changing the law just prolong the 'filibuster' because it can take time?
see above
>I think that using such MEME is useful for raising awareness of superficial problems
It may and hopefully other dig in to find the deeper issue. I think of it as a breadcrumb leading the researcher to a path of deeper knowledge
>What I'm talking about is focusing on more fundamental issues, and I'm talking about ideas for making things even better
I am listening, and reviewing your post over and over
>Solution: Remove them all
impeach.recall.censure
>I thought I had already presented the idea
you have, but it takes a moment for processing for me as i like to review and review
The main issue i see is that people do not know that a simple majority is needed to stop a filibuster. I never knew till i researched it.
-again could be wrong here
> it is constructive and effective to connect not only to the superficial problem but also to the fundamental problem
I would say that Potus gives us the superficial issues and our researches find the fundamental issues
superficial - this legistlation failed due to dem filibuster
fundamentally the dem is corrupt and no GOP senator has a backbone (Thus remove them all)
>The method of repeatedly using the exact same image and summarized information is already being used repeatedly
repetition builds reputation
I will often revert back to the same "old" memes myself, or repost the same op over and over again. just as vatican does.
>In other words, are you telling them to increase the methods mentioned above?
no, i do not share that. Every anon has there own will and mind, I just push the superficial mostly as researches on the main board are professionals in their research and will find the fundamental issues associated. if no anons pick up, then i begin the deeper research and share, share, share. then re meme
>advertising in the media
the account would be shut down same day
>Or is it just a statement that you want they gone?(remove?)
this
Again The fundamental issue i know of is that the people do not know that a simple majority will stop a filibuster, and thus they do not push their constituents to end it
I hope this layout is a better idea of what i am suggesting and the plan of attacks i work with
>meme superficial
>wait for diggers to find deeper insights
>share share share ^^^^
>create deeper fundamental memes
Superficial Meme >Nuke the filibuster
Fundamental Meme >Simple Majority to End a filibuster
Thoughts?
and thank you for the exercise anon
Avoid these phrases on X
Why does Donald trump want to end the filibuster?
-
To Resolve Government Shutdowns: Trump has argued that eliminating the filibuster would allow Republicans to pass funding bills with a simple majority, quickly ending shutdowns without needing Democratic votes.
-
To Pass Legislation Efficiently: Without the 60-vote threshold, Republicans could approve bills faster, bypassing Democratic obstruction and advancing Trump's agenda.
-
To Enact Voter Reforms: Trump ties ending the filibuster to passing "voter reform" measures like requiring voter ID, which he believes would strengthen elections.
-
To Prevent Future Democratic Blockades: He views the filibuster as a tool Democrats use to stall Republican priorities, and removing it would limit minority party leverage.
-
To Boost Republican Electoral Chances: By passing popular policies, Trump claims Republicans would become "impossible to beat" in midterms and future elections.
-
To Counter Supreme Court Reforms: In response to Democratic ideas like term limits or court expansion, Trump urges ending the filibuster to block such changes.
-
To Advance Economic Policies: Eliminating the filibuster would facilitate tax cuts, trade deals, and investments, which Trump sees as key to economic success.
-
To Reduce Senate Gridlock: Trump has long complained about the filibuster causing delays, arguing it hinders effective governing and national progress.
-
To Fulfill Campaign Promises: Removing the barrier would allow swift action on promises like health care reforms and infrastructure, fulfilling "Make America Great Again" goals.
-
To Strengthen Party Unity: Trump pressures Republicans to end the filibuster as a "Trump card," believing it unites the party and punishes those resisting his demands.
The fundamental issue with the filibuster in the U.S. Senate is that it has evolved into an anti-majoritarian tool that effectively requires a 60-vote supermajority to pass most legislation (via cloture to end debate), rather than the simple majority (51 votes) envisioned by the Constitution's framers for ordinary lawmaking. This creates a de facto veto power for a minority of 41 senators, often leading to gridlock, obstruction, and the blockage of bills—even those with broad public support or majority backing in the Senate.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/62de2161e1f64919aa99619f815a2774