>>8736

>Most easiest option would be to have the people "both parties" flood with calls demanding the end of the Majority Rule Filibuster and replace with the simple majority

If that's how change happens, it's very easy and simple, and I think having lots of people send in lots of documents is a safer way to go than having people gather somewhere in person

So, going back to the topic, in order for this to turn into actual action, it is important to recognize the problem

It is also important to clarify the actual damage

From another perspective, I also think that using threats or unclear explanations (i.e., the same kind of control as 'they') to advance these processes can lead to the creation of new problems

For example, I think that such actions can also slow the progress of justice and the improvement of problems

Well, if think it doesn't matter what do as long as the results are good from the start, then there's no need to think of safe ideas and methods from the start

>>8738

Ah, I don't really understand

When I watch a comedy show and everyone is having fun and laughing, there are times when I don't really understand it

It feels like that

Well, what I would like to say in the end is that when deciding on the best idea, it is very important to present the validity and validity of both positive and negative ideas

This is because I think it will also help prove that the choice is the true choice

Therefore, I think it is important for those who present ideas or those who present their denials to present clear explanations

(How far can go to prove that the choices made were not under mind control or brainwashing?)

>>8739

>>8741

>(How far can go to prove that the choices made were not under mind control or brainwashing?)

Twit is a good example

To what extent are the numbers accurately reflected?

It is true that the brainwashing situation may be accurately reflected in the numbers

>>8742

I thought it was efficient to clarify current issues and make people aware of them by explaining things clearly, but do you think otherwise?

Or did the AI ​​say so?

>>8744

I think that people's awareness and understanding would help things get done right and quickly

In other words, I think that the movement to promote 'Awakening' will lead to the resolution and improvement of the problems are currently talking about, and the possibility of creating even better things

>>8746

Of course, unnecessary long conversations without trying to improve things are out of the question

However, even that proves something else, and in fact, isn't this one proof that Filibuster is a problem?

>>8748, >>8747

Sorry, but could you please tell me in more detail what you would like to convey?

>>8744, >>8749

Also, once the problem becomes clear, I think it is effective to meme (in other words, provide counter ideas) their ideas that are not constructive/effective or that clearly lead to actual harm

(Well, I think this can be defined as an ongoing event)

(Therefore, I think that by further deepening our fundamental understanding, will further expand our awareness of abnormal problems)

If the answer presented by pursuing the problem is a good one, can approve it; if not, presenting an even better idea will create an opportunity to make things even better, and similarly, presenting another idea consisting of negation will reveal further issues/problems

I hope things get better quickly