Anonymous ID: URbt7oNb Nov. 22, 2017, 8:48 p.m. No.150561064   🗄️plebs

It's funny how Jewgle, Kikebook, and their ilk all of the sudden are concerned about neutrality when they will happily censor and throttle anyone they deem 'problematic' and 'toxic'

Anonymous ID: p3om2fsV Nov. 22, 2017, 8:49 p.m. No.150561111   🗄️plebs   >>1406 >>1760


Probably has something to do with the vapid shills and redditors spamming threads about





He was a nazi and is banned from going to isreal.

Anonymous ID: kSGAqwoA Nov. 22, 2017, 8:50 p.m. No.150561259   🗄️plebs


This! If you hate (((jews))) as much as I do, proove it and oppose net neutrality! ALL HAIL KEK!!!


Also Reddit likes NN - that should be ALL you need to know about it so don't waste your time trying to understand the shills and don't read their misinformation!



Anonymous ID: 58FT3wba Nov. 22, 2017, 8:51 p.m. No.150561322   🗄️plebs


A Jew, despite its insidious shekel-siphoning nature, is also an egotist. The whole "Chosen People" insanity should tell you how much deluded they are. As much as possible, many kikes would like to jew the goys AND inflate their ego all in one scam, but some (especially the wealthy ones) are just content on stroking their egos then just find some other way to jew the goys. Learn to manipulate them through their egotist nature and you can jew them too.

Anonymous ID: URbt7oNb Nov. 22, 2017, 8:52 p.m. No.150561406   🗄️plebs


>He was a nazi and is banned from going to isreal.

Are you saying a Jew wouldn't sell out another Jew?

Have you been paying attention to Hollywood lately?

Anonymous ID: I9zjK/q/ Nov. 22, 2017, 8:52 p.m. No.150561441   🗄️plebs   >>1673

Hello /pol/, I am sure glad to see that there is overwhelming support to remove the atrocious and demonic net neutrality. All net neutrality does is thin my pockets :( How are we supposed to innovate and promote a stronger economy when we are restricted in our ability to fuck the average consumer over, its like that jew Soros and the filthy SJWs don't care about a strong corporate economy (sadface)


But lucky for all of you, I have a great deal in place. When you subscribe to my ISP, for the mere additional cost of $24.99 per month, you can have access to 4chan under your internet plan! What a bargain! If you want to see the images posted on 4chan, we've got you covered with a mere additional $5.99 per month. And who said we aren't pro-consumer? If you feel the desire to "shitpost" (LOL XD) with your fellow 4channers, throw in a mere $10.99 extra and you can meme to your hearts desire! All brought to you by our exclusive 4chan access package!*


*4chan access package does not include access to any additional sites, those are sold seperately. The cost per month is subject to change at any point in time without notice. Any use of the site that infringes upon our terms of use of 4chan will be subject to penalty action, incl: the throttling of use of the site, denial of access to the site, penalty fines, or cancellation of the ISP subscription at any time without notice. Our ISP reserves the right to disallow access to 4chan at any point in time without denying our right to be reimbursed under this subscription package. Any violations of the above provisions will be subject to civil action to which the violator is required to pay the fees of bringing such an action.


Sounds great?! Good, now bend over and give me your fucking money.

Anonymous ID: URbt7oNb Nov. 22, 2017, 8:57 p.m. No.150561914   🗄️plebs   >>2408


Because right now companies like Comcast have to foot the bill for laying cable without getting to charge streaming services like YouTube and Netflix extra for using up more bandwith.

Just gotta follow the shekels. Its Jews Jewing Jews and I say gas all the kikes involved

Anonymous ID: 9w4SqRsz Nov. 22, 2017, 8:57 p.m. No.150561930   🗄️plebs



The amount it would cost the companies isn't worth the control ISPs could gain. Why cut into google's profits when they can take down sites you don't like without the ISP's help?

Anonymous ID: NmJccBMl Nov. 22, 2017, 9:01 p.m. No.150562383   🗄️plebs

that explains why we suddenly started getting a bunch of pro-NN retards. it's seriously like somebody flipped a switch and they all appeared.

Anonymous ID: ngqU1ods Nov. 22, 2017, 9:09 p.m. No.150563132   🗄️plebs


Ill second that, but I dont trust a shit skin wearing a purple tie saying "Trust me" just because he said so. nor do I trust comcast's $ dump on advertisements saying they wont throttle.

Anonymous ID: URbt7oNb Nov. 22, 2017, 9:09 p.m. No.150563139   🗄️plebs   >>3245


>Why are you okay with paying ridiculously more money for the same quality of service?

To get rid of all the poor niggers and women. All ready been stated further up in the thread fuckwit

Anonymous ID: 60TFFciB Nov. 22, 2017, 9:15 p.m. No.150563850   🗄️plebs   >>3921


Offending people isn't against the law, but conservative ideology regularly gets people banned on social media. Meanwhile leftists can outright call for white genocide and face no consequences. The net is not neutral.

Anonymous ID: sgA3zT2z Nov. 22, 2017, 9:16 p.m. No.150563867   🗄️plebs   >>3948


I know, it's hard to believe, but 4chan is not that high on a priority list for a very large amount of people. 4chan would likely sit on the same tier as porn websites. I mean the niche porn websites.



I'm from Europe, you retard. Net neutrality doesn't affect me directly. I'm saying that a large portion of the userbase will die off, which means less ad revenue, which means that 4chan can't pay its bills.

Anonymous ID: GRH7M3KW Nov. 22, 2017, 9:18 p.m. No.150564169   🗄️plebs   >>4418

Why /pol/ users was for net neutrality at the beginning of this year and against it now? Why Soros is shilling it hard? Anyone care to give a run down?

Anonymous ID: URbt7oNb Nov. 22, 2017, 9:19 p.m. No.150564277   🗄️plebs   >>4505


>from the actual issue?

Which is what? Huge streaming sites pay internet providers the same as Joe-Bobs Fishing and Cousin Fucking site?

They only care about "neutrality" when it benefits them. They wanna fuck us, I say they can get fucked in turn

Anonymous ID: JaJP1MCV Nov. 22, 2017, 9:19 p.m. No.150564288   🗄️plebs   >>5023


I think most people like myself have given it up as a lost cause. Not much you can do against trump's true believers who think he shits gold. I had hoped that /pol/ was still the same it was a few years back where people didn't just blindly follow and instead rallied around logic and debate.


Anti-NN shills are out of this world. Literally had someone equate NN with white genocide in another thread.

Anonymous ID: 60TFFciB Nov. 22, 2017, 9:20 p.m. No.150564308   🗄️plebs   >>4505


The people who are responsible for conservatives being censored on these websites desperately want to keep net neutrality. They are hiding something. Also it's not terms of use if only one group is being held accountable.

Anonymous ID: zP7Qp6Cs Nov. 22, 2017, 9:22 p.m. No.150564505   🗄️plebs   >>4763 >>4977


>Which is what?

The consumer's right to use their internet in any lawful manner they want. The common consumer will suffer the most from NN repeal.


The people who are responsible for things you don't like also breath air. You should probably stop breathing, otherwise people might think you're a liberal

Anonymous ID: X8yJnP0L Nov. 22, 2017, 9:24 p.m. No.150564758   🗄️plebs


And the manbaby Trump can stop the whole thing dead, but he won't, because he wants NET NETRUALITY gone to. That way his corporate buddy's make tons of money and the share holders will be happy.

FUCK Trump fuck soros and kill jews

Anonymous ID: DcTA5QW1 Nov. 22, 2017, 9:25 p.m. No.150564867   🗄️plebs   >>5125 >>5215 >>5339


The answer is they are literally retarded if they think net neutrality is a good thing.


Eliminating Net Neutrality is literally like letting EA sell you the internet. You'll pay 300% more for the same services you used to get or you'll get them 5000x slower.

Anonymous ID: mF1W8sXW Nov. 22, 2017, 9:27 p.m. No.150565023   🗄️plebs


Well last time this happened, Obama was president, so of course anything he did would be opposed. Give Obama his credit though, he knew the importance of the internet better than Trump does and didn't let it happen.

Anonymous ID: uirkB2rU Nov. 22, 2017, 9:30 p.m. No.150565339   🗄️plebs


You'll pay 300% more for the same services you used to get or you'll get them 5000x slower.


And you're saying that this was happening before net neutrality?

Anonymous ID: zP7Qp6Cs Nov. 22, 2017, 9:34 p.m. No.150565829   🗄️plebs   >>5944


You got really butthurt because I said NN protects my consumer rights. I know your shill tactics, always trying to trick the common man into thinking they have no rights. You can go fuck yourself.

Anonymous ID: hu1TQf4f Nov. 22, 2017, 9:34 p.m. No.150565862   🗄️plebs


If ISPs are common carriers they need government approval to operate. This is why they want to keep net neutrality, so they can control the internet access points by ensuring only a small number of controlled ISPs can exist, thus making it easier to censor things.

Anonymous ID: hu1TQf4f Nov. 22, 2017, 9:38 p.m. No.150566195   🗄️plebs


There is nothing in current net neutrality that prevents this. Net neutrality is about sharing infrastructure it has nothing to do with any of these things you shills are claiming it has to do with stop lying.