>>2731559
Let's entertain the idea you're for real for a moment, and assume you're an anon:
How has clockfagging "really gone downhill"?
What have you done to improve this situation which you describe?
Where should it go to have an "uphill" direction again?
Judging from your contributions in this thread, I'd have to say that you're not very high up on my list of "high ranking anons" when it comes to clockfagging:
You're presenting us with clockImages that make little to no sense and lack any explanations of what's being done (and what to me resembles useless numberfagging mostly, e.g. >>2523383 , >>2522556 ).
Then we get some "interdasting" date related to "HILDAWG"'s arrest in 2019 ( >>2462726 ), which is wrong since 2019-02-19 is 07:19 in QCalendarTime and 2018-12-31 is 06:29 – hell, even counting forward from 11/22 (end of the clock) to 12/01 reveals that 12/02 should be at the [00]-marker.
And even when you correct yourself ( >>2463167 ) you're wrong, as 08:30 would be 510 mins after 0:00, so it would be May 1 2019.
Also, I can't remember reading much of your "brilliant" ideas in the last thread, while there are clearly some regulars around here, who indeed contribute useful ideas and results.
Generally speaking, it is the nature of posting as an anon that you cannot tell who to trust.
Thus, the only valid way is to "recognize them by their fruit" – all the while nonetheless always keeping in the back of your head that it still might be a "poisoned apple".
The number of occasions the fruit turns out to be not "poisoned" (i.e. for real, true or at least plausible within other observations) decides about the overall long-term value of the contributor.
Q Team is certainly aware of this problem (esp. if "NSA is running this Operation") and for this reason would not give up on anything – especially not in the thread with the people probably most dedicated to trying to figure out what's going on with the clock.
I remember the times well, when "master clockfag" was posting that table over and over again, until at first a single anon understood, then others and then even more.
This is (one way) how to communicate an important message in an environment where noone knows about the value/trustability of messages ….
So, from that point of view, [8e11d0] clearly has little to no weight so far, while for example "master clockfag" had quite some good ideas that plausibly fit into the picture and connected things apparently meaningfully.
I'd agree clockfagging might have gone sideways a little for the last couple of weeks or so (but surely not "downhill") ….
But then, if the clock is such an important thing to understand, where's all the anons working on it?
Why's there only 5-10 regulars here, and some others dropping stuff w/o explaining a single thing, much less trying to make it plausible to others?
Where's the autists you mention who "have quietly been building the map"?
Why are they not here communicating how to do it, so that others can reproduce it and see for themselves if it makes sense or is plausible?
Instead of helping to counter "the clown's diversion" by delivering plausible ideas or results, why are you – in a generally not trustable environment – bitching around in the only thread dedicated to trying to figure out the clock … a thread with anons that have delivered quite some results in the past?
Just saying … >>2733316 ("master clockfag" assumably) is not wrong when asking about "clowns": "ever wonder why they started coming around?" [why & when that would be] …
If Q Team thought we'd be so much off the rails and it'd go all "downhill", then they would find a way – even in such an environment, and even with "dedicated shills" around, who also may be intelligent.
But I think it would be unlikely they chose to do so by calling us "shills" and bitching around w/o contributing (or helping) usefully ….