"Think clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers."

———————————————————————————————————–

"There need be no minute hand, as the hour figures will be 6. I. apart. But the interspace should be divided into [qu]arters and 5. minute marks." –Thomas Jefferson

Similar to Jefferson's Great Clock at Monticello, the Qlock (or Q-Clock) can be seen as only requiring a minute hand, which links dates & times by arranging a calendar around the clockface in a spiral, such that 12/07 is at the [:00] minute marker.

By "winding the clock" in a certain way, Q's posts can be connected to each other, and thus reveal the MAP which provides the KEY to spread the TRUTH.

"TRUTH shines LIGHT. LIGHT saves HUMANITY. Future proves past." –Q

Notables

>>1597885 ---- A short history of clock work on /qresearch/

>>1597896 --- "Learn our comms." The Good[win] example

>>1601339 --- Would the Q-Clock run backwards (sometimes)?

>>1609784 --- The Qlock & the relevance of 111 days.

>>1614414 --- Clockfag who "invented" the clock connects the dots.

>>1614499 --- Are markers on the Qlock connected via fixed angles?

>>1616856 --- Clockwinder's Mission Patch

>>1619297 --- Should there be a system of letters on the Qlock?

>>1637321 --- Q-Clock runs strictly on EST.

>>1645943 --- Time-Lapse Cryptography? (also >>1603337 & >>1736673 )

>>1664583 --- "Watch the water" 111 days theory seems to have legs (also >>1671738 ).

>>1691775 --- The Qlock, two mirrors & a reverse (relevant markers to watch each day)

>>1735324 --- Possible ways of arranging/connecting markers around the Qlock

>>1735636 --- More on letters on the Qlock (also >>1743220 )

>>1751959 --- Q posts & timestamp histograms (from >>1749931 )

>>1764216 --- Morning strolls -- fixed angles & the Looking Glass

>>1898297 --- JFK assassination seen through the Reverse Mirror

>>1913896 --- The Happenings Solver

>>1932073 --- More [O]WLs: What's @Jack got to do with it?

>>1938940 --- More confirmations: [:25] & [:55]

>>1966863 --- Q-Clock inventorAnon does it again (large collection of connected posts)

>>2001161 --- Seconds matter ("No coincidences").

>>2012483 --- Differences b/w the three-timezone HTML & qanon.pub

>>2016049 --- The Qlock & the 12 chapters of "Alice in Wonderland" (also before in >>1945505 )

>>2018834 --- Time Traveler's Guide to the QClock

more.

UP IS DOWN

LEFT IS RIGHT

MIRROR

FIND THE 4TH

4TH PATRIOTS

Thanks for the fresh bread, Anon.

Here is a baker girl.

>>2021935

Thanks RedHairedLadyAnon! Quite enjoyable!

Had been a while ago since I got baking practice; for reasons of superstition I'd better not do it in the General anymore, remembering what happened last time, when I was a real apprentice in the kitchen. Lol.

For now, can only offer some updated clocks in return, as I still haven't found a pic with a beautiful clockmaker chick of the old-school kind.

>>2021643

>>>1966863 (You) — Q-Clock inventorAnon does it again (large collection of connected posts)

Thank you Anon. Q invented the Q Clock, so maybe a discoverer? We are on the We The People Expedition, treasure hunters, digging for gold in every Q post. :)

>>2022275

Here's a "clock maker" pin up for ya!

Maybe not what you had in mind for clock maker, but close enough ;D

>>2022498

Rofl! Thank you very much. Clock shows 09:06:59 – that will sure do for tonight!

Even though I just noticed that I missed out on 3 Q posts before posting above clocks, I'm gonna call it a day, starting that trip into dreamland ….

G'nite y'all and Happy Independence Day, you marvellous fags! Godspeed.

RED

>>2021597

Thanks Baker.

>>2015655 (last clockBread)

Had been trying to visualize 1688x1688 posts & the ratios of their number of lines. Turns out simply using all these 2.8 mil ratios and drawing them colored is not useful for this kind of analysis.

It would probably be faster to do it manually, with a list of number of lines per post, which is why I put them in a pastebin.

For now, I will postpone further work on this, as I wanted to check the Time traveler's Guide and the order of posts that might emerge from this.

In case someone wants to check number of lines per post in the meantime, the link is:

pastebin.com/MUwDUQtD

Further, the three timezone html got an own folder to live in, such that the link will not have to change with every update.

For those using that for their work, the link to the folder containing an updated zip is:

mega.nz/#F!iLwgXKRb!XvA-cUt5-8XyRPlgoVH-FQ

PostNumbers in the 3-timezone html can relatively easy be "translated" into qanon.pub's postNumbers using >>2012483 from last bread -- starting with postNumber 401 they are always higher, meaning that one would just have to scroll backwards in qanon.pub (at max 8 posts back) to find the corresponding post.

>>2027150

Thanks! Nicely done. The colors in the funny graph really need a change though. The girl's a beauty, but the Wheel of Fortune shouldn't be looking like on TV. lol.

Hope I'll get to doing that later this evening.

>>2027208

Great list of notables from last bread.

I particularly liked the chessfag's clock. >>1943343

Some interesting challenges ahead and i'm looking forward to nailing down the letters on the clockface. What's the working theory on the delta between POTUS TWEETs & QPosts?

Hope to find some more time to explore a potential book cipher too (AinW).

>>2027576

Oh my … trying to time travel, and still not jumping off the building until I fully understand the device and how it works.

Don't think there's a theory for letters so far. Personally, I am considering three possibilities (latin-26, greek-24, hebrew-22). Probably 'cause I'm kind of familiar w/ these three. For reasons of relative unfamiliarity (in US) and partial similarity to greek, for now would exclude cyrillic/russian (29), even though Q said: "Make sure to learn Russian.", and 29 could work well on a clock.

Without it meaning anything for now, would favor either greek or hebrew – rare enough both, historically important roots of western civ, and hebrew even "esoterically"/"mystically" laden (esoteric as opposite to exoteric in religious philosophy). Lol, hebrew would be difficult though, as anons gonna call us whatever-not kikes as usually they don't have the right distance (or the wrong connections) when it comes to this interesting topic.

With deltas in time, my working theory so far is that there must either be a set of (static) pre-defined, valid deltas to look for. If so, these would certainly include 0, 1 & 15 mins, maybe 5 & 10 mins, not sure. Could also be that valid deltas are defined/communicated operationally (or via the clock and previous posts), so that this would be the way to know which deltas to look for.

Would probably be futile (and lots of work) to look for all possible deltas trying to figure out a connection between tweets & posts. As my hypothesis, deltas are rather used for (operational/situational) comms, while the Q-Clock & previous Q posts are more for reading/stitching together the "story".

Back to the Time Traveler's Guide ….

>>2028248

Delta theory at one time was that it was the difference in time between trump tweets and Q posts (or alternatively within their tweets/posts).

Seemed to work for countdown from 15 to 10 to 1 already. 7 has been used in the past as well.

Here are today's "Q questions" to be solved. I propose the answers are elsewhere in the clock.

Wind the clock clockfags.

Just started on the :59 markers. Like a poor man's version of the time traveler.

We have it all. Here is just the start.

Will drop on mainstreet as well.

Back to original concept (just dropped the slice for anyone not a clock fag.

>>2030548

Wrote a quite simple code which takes all tweets, computes time differences between those, and also all Q post. Results where connected to the clock script, so I was able to draw clocks for arbitrary time differences, like shown in one example in previous clockBread in >>1774958

Had done a similar (less beautiful/developed) thing back in the #40s or so, as described in the short history of clock work >>1597885 (pb, pic on the right). Still have the PDF and just checked it: There was also an [8] min time diff tweet-->post with the tweet: "FBI director Andrew McCabe is racing ...".

Attached is a first step towards the Time Traveling -- meaning I hope the funny graph looks a little less funny now, with corresponding markers colored in the same color. Stole some colors from the girl up above >>2027150 , who seemed to like it despite the homosexual color scheme. Lol. Thanks again!

One might also think about changing the numbers inside the circle according to some different scheme (TT guide) ....

>>2027576

Forgot to mention: You're right, should have put the chessfags post into the notables as well. Still, and esp. after having gone over the Time Traveler's Guide, I am not sure if 07/12 is the end as predicted by the chessfag -- but time will tell.

Am still trying order/piece together posts according to the TT guide -- took me much too long to get all these colors. Sheesh ....

Nice colors Anon. Will print it out (like the last one).

I am going to be away for a few days (will try to phone fag but no contributions).

My first thoughts on deltas in the standard 30 minute, 15 minute to get the diagonals for all of them. If you look at my manual paint file creation (all the :59 second posts for first few months) I thought it looked promising. Is way too time consuming though. Could you automate this?

We have had deltas on opposite sides of a marker (:07 example and whatever it was we were doing when we ended up with a peace sign).

>>2032170

Enjoy the time then (if that's possible)!

About gathering all posts for whatever marker – as an html that'd be relatively easy. For rendering html code (i.e. single posts or a group of posts) into graphic form (e.g. png), I am not sure. Would likely be possible via html → pdf → png. Not sure what that would look like, will do some searching.

As for the Nuclear Disarmament symbol:

"The symbol is a combination of the semaphore signals for the letters 'N' and 'D', standing for 'nuclear disarmament'."

(wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_symbols#Peace_symbol)

So the N would be two arms/flags left & right, each 45 deg spread. So if the scheme is consistent, the hands should always be 15 (or 14) mins apart.

>>2033357

Ok, I believe I know what these are for, but please let me go step by step:

I think I have figured out how to time travel. My little, slow, nine year old lapT is just running a one-liner for the – for now I'll call them quarters – first bunch of lines in the Time Travel Guide:

(1) Minutes are always :15

(2) for the given Minutes (above) one would run through all seconds [:01]–[:59] and check for posts, if they exist

(3) Messages replied to also count

(4) From what I have checked so far, only last line of text is in the graphic (or last sentence, i.e. :28)

(5) Timestamps (in the graphic) where it says ". . . . ." means that there is either no post, or no line written (e.g. 15:42 is a find, but only an image, i.e. 03-Jul-2018 23:15:42 Airport Lounge)

(6) Reposts (and maybe other posts) do not count (i.e. 15:27 is a find, but [Repost Lost]

(6) From all the text gathered thusly, I could reproduce the text in attached pic, by putting the sentences together backwards (but I'd have to verify this explicitely), since I just ran a two liner on the command line.

When doing this for timestamps ":15:[01 thru :59] I complete the first "quarter" (as I've called them, i.e. dates in second pic from 12/07 to 02/04.

>>2033595

Correction to (7) – erroneously numbered (6): Ordering is backwards, but appears to have sth to with 58,28,57,27, etc …

Will write a much better script that also extracts the text … this is all just from what I see in the timestamps, and searching for those in the archive. Have to go slower, as I'm getting excited …. lol. sorry. :D

>>2033357

>>2033595

SEE >>2033796

Can you run it for a last word cipher?

>>2033813

Last sentence, last word – all (almost) the same & possible. Was reproducing the "first quarter" from the time travel guide only – looked like it were all sentences/lines there.

Easy guess for "2nd quarter was that mins are [:30] – but would have to check that. From pictures in >>2033357 (3rd pic) it looks like last quarter might have mins both [:28] & [:52]. So I don't assume all "quarters" are as easy as the first in the guide. Will throw together a script – might take me 30 mins or so ….

>>2033928

see pic

BRB…

>>2033928

Experimenting, both last sentence & last word work so far. [2] Q Chapters!

>take me 30 mins or so ….

You're Amazing!!!

>>2034444

HRC=Alice In Wonderland

HRC/cabal 2 days late

>>2034856

And here it is with HRC arrest post was a LARP. See line about "11?" When did Q say?

>>2033928

The ordering was more complicated than thought – no cigar .. lol.

Looks like in first quarter [:45] comes first (of course!), then [:15], and then probably around the clock – but I'll have to look at that a bit more.

There's a pastebin as the stuff comes out (after manual ordering)

pastebin.com/s2hG0BMD

Mentions sometimes have last word, sometimes last sentence, with 03-Apr-2018 20:18:12 (EST, another mention) the 4th word in the orig title of the pic. Will probably find out how this works … lol.

At the end of the pastebin is what's left over. The only thing that I don't get is why post 28-Oct-2017 17:15:48 (EST, " God bless fellow Patriots.") is not in the image above

>>2035483

>>2034444

Thanks very much. But not so amazing, just curious very much, and I don't care how long it takes to learn something …. ;)

However, when mentions are involved, then it appears as if the rule would be (which I could use):

When there's more than one sentence, then use the last sentence only.

When there's only one sentence, then use the last word only.

>>2035483

Based on how I got to them may be the order as

[59][01][31][29]

[58][02][32][28]

[57][03][33][27]

[56][04][34][26]

[55][05][35][25]

[54][06][36][24]

[53][07][37][23]

[52][08][38][22]

[51][09][39][21]

[50][10][40][20]

[49][11][41][19]

[48][12][42][18]

[47][13][43][17]

[46][14][44][16]

[45][15]

or

[00][30]

[59][01][31][29]

[58][02][32][28]

[57][03][33][27]

[56][04][34][26]

[55][05][35][25]

[54][06][36][24]

[53][07][37][23]

[52][08][38][22]

[51][09][39][21]

[50][10][40][20]

[49][11][41][19]

[48][12][42][18]

[47][13][43][17]

[46][14][44][16]

[45][15]

>>2035879

>[59][01][31][29]

>[58][02][32][28]

>[57][03][33][27]

>[56][04][34][26]

>[55][05][35][25]

>[54][06][36][24]

>[53][07][37][23]

>[52][08][38][22]

>[51][09][39][21]

>[50][10][40][20]

>[49][11][41][19]

>[48][12][42][18]

>[47][13][43][17]

>[46][14][44][16]

>[45][15][30]

>[59][01][31][29]

>[58][02][32][28]

>[57][03][33][27]

>[56][04][34][26]

>[55][05][35][25]

>[54][06][36][24]

>[53][07][37][23]

>[52][08][38][22]

>[51][09][39][21]

>[50][10][40][20]

>[49][11][41][19]

>[48][12][42][18]

>[47][13][43][17]

>[46][14][44][16]

>[45][15]

>>2035483

Had to see it like this, WHOA

>>2035919

Oh, yes, that might been written somewhere on the guide too … I remember seeing this somewhere before. Thanks will try that immediately

>>2035879

>>2035919

>>2035986

It was in the guide, I can see it fits perfectly when mirrored like this as a picture, paint the picture?

[59][01][31][29]

[58][02][32][28]

[57][03][33][27]

[56][04][34][26]

[55][05][35][25]

[54][06][36][24]

[53][07][37][23]

[52][08][38][22]

[51][09][39][21]

[50][10][40][20]

[49][11][41][19]

[48][12][42][18]

[47][13][43][17]

[46][14][44][16]

[45][15][45][15]

[46][14][44][16]

[47][13][43][17]

…

very interesting!

I am in awe.

I am but a simple clock fag who reads posts by seconds marker. Seems to work as well. The clock key / graphic is central to all this.

Proud to serve with you Anons.

WWG1WGA

>>2036087

Not doing pastebin this time. This is how it comes out raw w/o any editing:

13-Dec-2017 00:15:45 (EST)==>15:45 “Special.”

*17-Apr-2018 06:18:17 (EST)==>45:15 Good work

08-Apr-2018 13:15:14 (EST)==>46:14 Enjoy the show

03-Mar-2018 23:15:14 (EST)==>46:14 BOOM

*03-Apr-2018 20:18:12 (EST)==>17:43 File ([5]hide): [6]d8d6d1795849f4f⋯.png (662.37 KB, 1024x512, 2:1, [7]If_Satanists_Took_Over_the….png) 8 9

03-Jul-2018 23:15:42 (EST)==>18:42 File ([60]hide): [61]f6ae2f746fe45fb⋯.png (1.49 MB, 591x1280, 591:1280, [62]United.png) 63 64

10-Mar-2018 15:15:18 (EST)==>42:18 Not w/ this administration

28-Oct-2017 17:15:48 (EST)==>12:48 God bless fellow Patriots

*20-Nov-2017 13:19:39 (EST)==>48:12 Snap

08-Apr-2018 00:15:40 (EST)==>20:40 Contact window ok

12-Feb-2018 15:15:20 (EST)==>40:20 Response forthcoming

21-Apr-2018 14:15:51 (EST)==>09:51 MOAB incoming

12-Jun-2018 22:15:52 (EST)==>08:52 Some must remain clean (distance) from what is about to happen

06-Apr-2018 16:15:37 (EST)==>23:37 Border state - coincidence?

*23-Nov-2017 01:16:24 (EST)==>37:23 HERE

09-Dec-2017 14:15:53 (EST)==>07:53 POTUS: 1:37 US Military

20-Apr-2018 22:15:07 (EST)==>53:07 Planned for later

18-Feb-2018 21:15:07 (EST)==>53:07 FOR GOD & COUNTRY

*06-Jan-2018 16:18:50 (EST)==>53:07 PERSONAL?

05-Nov-2017 18:15:25 (EST)==>35:25 Godfather III

*19-Apr-2018 21:16:41 (EST)==>05:55 ending?

10-Mar-2018 21:15:05 (EST)==>55:05 These people are sick

*17-Apr-2018 06:16:34 (EST)==>34:26 Q

05-Feb-2018 20:15:26 (EST)==>34:26 Raw only

10-Apr-2018 00:15:56 (EST)==>04:56 Start

17-May-2018 19:15:27 (EST)==>33:27 [Personal]

04-Apr-2018 17:15:57 (EST)==>03:57 This will become very relevant very soon

15-Dec-2017 01:15:57 (EST)==>03:57 Godspeed, Patriots

*28-Jun-2018 11:17:39 (EST)==>32:28 When will something be revealed to wake up more sleepers?

18-Jun-2018 01:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 Important to remember

*17-Jun-2018 10:17:35 (EST)==>02:58 Thank you Q and POTUS

19-Apr-2018 21:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 We control

21-Nov-2017 19:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 Ordering is critical

10-May-2018 10:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 Now comes the pain

10-Feb-2018 05:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 Goodbye

07-Jan-2018 03:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 Let FREEDOM RING

There's still the issue w/ which word to use when original image filenames are involved …. will have a smoke & think

>>2036325

Line 5:

03-Jul-2018 23:15:42 (EST)

The image from Q out the United lounge w/o further text can easily be fixed …. when mentions are involved, apparently sometimes one word is still used …

For an algorithm to work, one would need a rule for that, or edit/select manually…

Holy autism what just happened here?

>>2036105

Not a LARP right? This is really happening I think.

>>2036325

Sweet read.

Love you clock fags.

No homo.

>>2036325

[2] Q Chapters

so I with Last word only

(sentence structure matters)

& 1 with last Line/sentence only

Is that possible?

>>2036373

>>2036373

Idk – someone had a good idea, it appeared, so we're trying to get things to work. It's 4th of July still !

As long as the moon is still lit somewhere in America it will technically count. We have some hours. Problem is, I don’t know how to help.

God bless you automate anon!

>>2036405

look what happens when you do the 2nd way, 2 Q chapters

>>2036325

Here is what it should read as last word only

>>2033796

I can see on the graphic I by mistake omitted what if satanists part, for the last line/sentence part, sorry, didn't mean to confuse.

>>2036325

When there isn't any text in the Q post, the answer is in the .png .jpg name.

what if satanists took over

over

when there are both like in this example

it looks like it doesn't hurt the meaning with it included with the text when there are both. Saying ring twice may not make a difference, but let me check out post before to see if it changes meanings

>>2036411

>>2036442

see >>2033357 about 7/5

>>2036325

>>2036495

last word/number is 6 but no spaces as in words in a sentence.

would read

word/number

6

ring

ring

sick

club

sentence

6

ring

Just sick.

Part of the club.

How would you apply the scrip to use numbers? Maybe just leave it the same and we can figure out by reading that the numbersmixedwithrandomletters can be ignored for now at least until we see otherwise.

>>2036352

Just to clarify :)

Last word in every sentence.

Last sentence.

As in pics >>2036647

>>2036495

In the process of fixing these last issues.

I can treat images in mentions differently than Q's.

For mentions, I'd use the last word (but not the filetype, i.e. ".png." etc) This would catch the "ring".

For Q posts, currently using the last sentence (if not "Q"). This would catch the entire "Part of the Club" phrase.

Numbers can easily be treated special and each single digit seen as a word. This would only catch the "6" in the image of the plane.

Still catching a Q in the one-line mention of post 17-Apr-2018 06:16:34 (EST)

and missing "The Great Awakening" which is in a [Repost Lost] from 04-Nov-2017 23:15:02 (EST) – assuming [Reposts] are discarded…..

>>2037217

>Still catching a Q in the one-line mention of post 17-Apr-2018 06:16:34 (EST)

That Q is good, an Anon said, "good morning Q"& Q responded to get in the last word of each sentence for, Q start. (start last word from next post)

The repost from "The Great Awakening" is good, looks like Q replied/repost to Q for this reason, which we knew there had to be a reason for it.

I'm just blown away by all the

"Take multiple paths"

Here are the two ways/last word each sentence & last sentence for part of the [29]min timestamp in order of last drop 1st

>>2037813

Thank you, Anon! Apologies, I have to give up for today, and will sleep over all that hopefully to be a bit wiser tomorrow. Will also have to think about the Time Traveler's Guide again and will go over all the images posted tonight. Thanks again, God bless & a Good Night to y'all!

>>2037217

Reposts for the seconds version x:01, so far it looks like just that specific post unlike the timestamp drop order.

>>2038001

No apology needed! Sleep well Anon, you deserve it! :)

Awesome work tonight!!!

Here is the "ZERO TIME!" proof I promised days ago. It's my first graphic, I stole a couple Qlock Pepe's from you guys hope you didn't mind.

Advice / tips are appreciated on the graphics. I hope this proves my point about POTUS' old tweets.

>>2031990

Wow! It's beautiful. Nice palette of colors that highlight some important markers. I'll test it out with some future dates.

I'm so glad I found Clockwork Qrange… Made a clock graphic months ago but went down another rabbit hole, chasing the history of the kab-allah. (+ got banned for asking questions about the markers, kek!!)

Alsoly attached are some interesting posts collected from old bread about clocks.

>>2036325

Looks like there's already plenty of great ideas floating around in this bread to catch up on.

Thanks clockfags.

>>2038001

Did the [29] min marker by seconds as an example attached.

1

last sentence

1 last word of last/or only sentence/pic titles

for the [29] marker in this example here >>2037813 by order of drop

>>2039492

>>2038001

Did the [29] min marker by seconds as an example attached.

1

last sentence

1 last word of last/or only sentence/pic titles

for the [29] marker in this example here >>2037813 by order of drop and same as above and also as another option/multiple path the last word of every sentence.

>>2039498

Could you do all the posts at :29 seconds by date? That was what I was working on above (may be different I’d as icrap fagging).

Also :59 seconds.

Simple [:30] second marker graphic with only Qposts from the 15 minute delta.

2 posts about Green.

Here is the Time Travelers Guide For QClock

shared timestamps Quarter

Full Message

[01][59][29][31] individually & together (read across)

>>2038001

Is it possible to add shared timestamps to the script too, if not no biggie this graphic wasn't hard to do combing the shared timestamps.

>>2040224

Forgot to mention, still checking over, very time consuming by hand will repost if any corrections need to be made (missing word, etc…)

>>2039573

Yes, going to catch a little bit of sleep right now. Before I get back if you want to take a look if you are able to get to a computer, it helps searching the Q posts with ctrl F :min:, ex :29: that way you can eliminate hour & different min popping up in your search.

Hey! I'm picking up on some shit here and figured I'd run it by you guys.

one example:

>>544247

a very simple but important post- If you apply the 'last words of every sentence and last sentence only' rule, it plainly has another message.

>"ALL matter matters. Learn."

>>544304

THE VERY NEXT POST same rules

>"WH Innocents THREAT game conflict control 2% REAL SICK week"

I know I have to be missing something with that 2nd one. It almost wants to make sense… I know this is relevant as fuck. I think there's a multi-level cipher right in the text..

So I'm scrolling around qanon.pub applying that to every post, and a lot of posts(maybe like 75%+) actually say something semi-cogent. It might be jibberish sometimes, but usually it forms cohesive shorthand phrases(aka not sentences, aka how Q usually writes).

Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse here, but I'm now curious how to put these things in order to make a bigger statement like y'all are trying, or simply, if you can just read them one by one, like mini messages. It's kinda like draft comms(KINDA)- the words are just lying there out in the open, its up to us to know where to look to get the real message.

Even the Q posts recently that have gotten so much toxic feedback over at /qresearch sorta spell out in some cool ways that they(Q) planned for this shill attack. Maybe they even caused it. (IMO, don't go over there to /qresearch linking to here right now.. y'all get a lot of work done over here and it would be a shame if those boss-tier shills came over and started disrupting things.)

BTW, didn't Q say they'd help us through this?

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.21 📁

Jan 14 2018 00:28:29 (EST)

>Side_by_Side (graphic form):

>BDT/False Flag posts vs actual news of bomb attempt (NYC)_

>DEFCON 1 posts vs H scare_

>[2] above represent PRIMARY indicators.

>SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

>REMAINDER below.

>START HERE.

>WILL GUIDE.

>Q

There's a hell of a lot to this once you start figuring out its layered like a fuckin Gobstopper..

Let's see. From my recollection, we got:

>Stringers(whats included in them and what's not included)

>The graphic

>The map

>Keywords

>a keySTONE

>Timestamps

>The clock

>The mirror

>Spelling/syntax errors and intentionals

>Some kind of time concept that alludes to foreshadowing(future proves past concept)

>Snow White(book?), Alice [in] Wonderland(book?), [The Hunt for] Red October(book?), Godfather 3, White Squall, WarGames

>Chess

>Anagrams

>Pictograms(?)

….. did I miss any?

I don't want to shit up the bread with my newbie shit if its newbie shit. I'll lurk. I'll catch up soon and help with some of this grindy sounding stuff.

Where should I start? I was thinking about starting from the beginning and logging every single post, after applying that rule. Then maybe trying different rules/combos. If it works, we'll have a database to draw from.

A good morning to you clockfags!

Catching up on all the images in comments! And things are fast again. Lol.

It's pressure, that makes carbon become a diamond, right? POTUS thinks so too, as it seems. lol.

Thanks very much to all of you – working on the [:29] now w/ lastWordCipher only. Just to mention it: [:15] (1st quarter) was not lastWordCipher – at least not in the TTG.

Yesterday was merely trying to correctly & consistently reproduce the 1stQuarter TTG – became confusing, when suddenly [:29] was worked on … but whatever, let's try last words only with the [:29].

>>2039573

Had a quick look at [:29]. So far it seems – while in [:15]/1stQuarter mentions were only taken into account when they had a matching timestamp (i.e. ":15:XX"), now mentions also have to be used, when the Q post matches the timestamp

Two examples for this:

(1) Q post from 27-Jan-2018 14:29:44 (EST) only had a single line, mentioning post [>>]181050 with only another mention ([>>]181023) and an image named "screenshot"

(2) Q post from 08-Apr-2018 16:29:41 (EST) has the "web?", that's fine. Also has a mention [>>]955555 containing "connected"

Continuing ……

Seems all Caps in Last Line Drops, type of post read better from Bottom up…….

>>2038757

Think mirror

>>2044058

>>2038757

Expand your mirroring.

>>2038757

Q CLOCKS 07/05 - 07/08

Q CLOCKS 07/09 - 07/12

>>2040613

>(1) Q post from 27-Jan-2018 14:29:44 (EST) only had a single line, mentioning post [>>]181050 with only another mention ([>>]181023) and an image named "screenshot"

Been testing, I'm finding even if there is a word prior to random numbers it is best to just use the last number even if there is a real word, because in the image name screenshot the last digit is 5 which is later combined with to make a date.

…..back to testing….

>>2040613

>>2046574

Later combined to make a date when putting shared timestamps together as in rough draft earlier pic with the 4 rows of timestamps together reading into a message.

Clockfags, my admiration of your mental dexterity, crypto-wizardry & dogged persistance knows no bounds.

My gratitude & love >nohomo< to you all.

#WWG1WGA

>>2046627

Another Quarter shared timestamps rough draft, coming together!

>>2047673

All posts connected bc together they read one large whole message is what this is looking like!

>>2048440

This is what it looks like when done automatically run for [:29] (3rd col in pic):

15-Mar-2018 18:29:14 (EST)==>46:14 BOOOOOM!

04-Mar-2018 11:29:14 (EST)==>46:14 [Roasted]

*16-Jun-2018 01:37:16 (EST)==>18:42 KNOW?

09-Mar-2018 18:29:48 (EST)==>12:48 [24]RR

27-Jan-2018 02:29:48 (EST)==>12:48 cut?

10-Mar-2018 20:29:12 (EST)==>48:12 Coincidence?

#08-Apr-2018 16:29:41 (EST)==>19:41 Connected

08-Apr-2018 16:29:41 (EST)==>19:41 web?

22-Nov-2017 23:29:41 (EST)==>19:41 updated.

14-Dec-2017 21:29:49 (EST)==>11:49 Patriots.

#11-May-2018 00:29:40 (EST)==>20:40 China

11-May-2018 00:29:40 (EST)==>20:40 further.

#29-Apr-2018 22:29:50 (EST)==>10:50 R

29-Apr-2018 22:29:50 (EST)==>10:50 18.

*05-Nov-2017 19:34:57 (EST)==>10:50 Country.

20-Nov-2017 02:29:21 (EST)==>39:21 October.

#07-Feb-2018 19:29:09 (EST)==>51:09 DACA!!!

07-Feb-2018 19:29:09 (EST)==>51:09 WH.

*11-Jun-2018 16:03:55 (EST)==>22:38 LARP

#06-Mar-2018 01:29:38 (EST)==>22:38 rebuilding.

06-Mar-2018 01:29:38 (EST)==>22:38 victory.

08-Jan-2018 23:29:38 (EST)==>22:38 PATRIOTS.

22-May-2018 16:29:23 (EST)==>37:23 show.

*08-Apr-2018 11:09:57 (EST)==>36:24 Globally

10-Mar-2018 14:29:24 (EST)==>36:24 Important.

#23-Dec-2017 15:29:24 (EST)==>36:24 Q

23-Dec-2017 15:29:24 (EST)==>36:24 Map.

#10-Mar-2018 12:29:06 (EST)==>54:06 helpful!

10-Mar-2018 12:29:06 (EST)==>54:06 11:11

11-Nov-2017 23:29:35 (EST)==>25:35 Satan”

#06-Apr-2018 18:29:25 (EST)==>35:25 planned?

06-Apr-2018 18:29:25 (EST)==>35:25 necessary.

*11-Dec-2017 13:39:59 (EST)==>55:05 chances?

02-May-2018 22:29:26 (EST)==>34:26 9

10-Dec-2017 23:29:56 (EST)==>04:56 show.

*19-May-2018 17:03:54 (EST)==>33:27 7

*23-Dec-2017 01:10:06 (EST)==>33:27 free)

#19-Apr-2018 21:29:03 (EST)==>57:03 soon???

19-Apr-2018 21:29:03 (EST)==>57:03 CA.

01-Jul-2018 13:29:32 (EST)==>28:32 know.

31-Oct-2017 23:29:28 (EST)==>32:28 picture.

11-Nov-2017 23:29:58 (EST)==>02:58 +

*27-Jan-2018 12:43:56 (EST)==>58:02 event.

07-Dec-2017 22:29:30 (EST)==>30:30 —end—

Missing out a bunch of those in the image, as it seems. Will have to look where these come from, and why they aren't caught.

>>2049362

Sorry, forgot to mention: Timestamps (EST) prefixed by "*" are those from posts mentioned by Q, which match the marker looked for (i.e. they have ":29:XX" as time).

When prefixed by "#" they also come from posts Q mentioned, but these mentions do not match the marker looked for (i.e. these mentions don't have ":29:XX in timestamp).

>>2049362

I may have missed them, very tedious when doing by hand, will check again on my end.

>>2049494

Trial & error, as the message expands it easier to see what fits and doesn't fit. I've done 6 timestamps lined them up to read as they go down their own timestamp as one message and then across along all stamps for another larger message. I think we are safe to exclude "#", but looks like we may need to keep "*".

crosschecking again……

>>2040224

It's no problem running all connected markers (e.g. [:01] [:59] [:29] [:31]) in one fell swoop, and also combing these into some tabular. Takes that little machine just two mins or so and I have a PDF (pic) ….

problem is getting the words correctly extracted (i.e. finding a set of rules that is consistent & works for all cases – and is after what Q had in mind … lol)

I know it is time consuming & maybe even frustrating to do it manually ….

I'm slowly getting frustrated slowly about me being so dumb to not see the rules that need be applied to get it together accurately!! Darn ! :(

>>2033796

For your last word cipher pic above, I'm currently getting:

13-Dec-2017 00:15:45 (EST)==>15:45 “Special.”

*17-Apr-2018 06:18:17 (EST)==>45:15 work

08-Apr-2018 13:15:14 (EST)==>46:14 show.

03-Mar-2018 23:15:14 (EST)==>46:14 BOOM.

*03-Apr-2018 20:18:12 (EST)==>17:43 If_Satanists_Took_Over_the_Vatican

03-Jul-2018 23:15:42 (EST)==>18:42 United

10-Mar-2018 15:15:18 (EST)==>42:18 administration.

28-Oct-2017 17:15:48 (EST)==>12:48 Patriots.

*20-Nov-2017 13:19:39 (EST)==>48:12 Snap

08-Apr-2018 00:15:40 (EST)==>20:40 ok.

12-Feb-2018 15:15:20 (EST)==>40:20 forthcoming.

21-Apr-2018 14:15:51 (EST)==>09:51 incoming.

12-Jun-2018 22:15:52 (EST)==>08:52 happen.

06-Apr-2018 16:15:37 (EST)==>23:37 coincidence?

*23-Nov-2017 01:16:24 (EST)==>37:23 HERE

09-Dec-2017 14:15:53 (EST)==>07:53 Military

20-Apr-2018 22:15:07 (EST)==>53:07 later.

18-Feb-2018 21:15:07 (EST)==>53:07 COUNTRY.

*06-Jan-2018 16:18:50 (EST)==>53:07 PERSONAL?

05-Nov-2017 18:15:25 (EST)==>35:25 III.

*19-Apr-2018 21:16:41 (EST)==>05:55 ending?

10-Mar-2018 21:15:05 (EST)==>55:05 sick.

*17-Apr-2018 06:16:34 (EST)==>34:26 Q

05-Feb-2018 20:15:26 (EST)==>34:26 only.

10-Apr-2018 00:15:56 (EST)==>04:56 Start.

17-May-2018 19:15:27 (EST)==>33:27 [Personal]

04-Apr-2018 17:15:57 (EST)==>03:57 soon.

15-Dec-2017 01:15:57 (EST)==>03:57 Patriots.

*28-Jun-2018 11:17:39 (EST)==>32:28 sleepers?

18-Jun-2018 01:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 remember.

*17-Jun-2018 10:17:35 (EST)==>02:58 POTUS

19-Apr-2018 21:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 control.

21-Nov-2017 19:15:58 (EST)==>02:58 critical.

10-May-2018 10:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 pain.

10-Feb-2018 05:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 Goodbye.

07-Jan-2018 03:15:01 (EST)==>59:01 RING.

Not a bad match to what you have, except I have "work", where you have "Good", then the fucking "Satanists" (it's "over"), and I might have made a sorting error with "Q only." vs. "only. Q"

>>2050323

Yeah, still in the learning stage, cue Q, "Learn."

>>2050422

Beautiful :). I copy & pasted from the pic title "Over" from qanon map w/o clicking file to view whole title name, no dessert for me! I'll have to check to see if the sorting was on my with the Q only/only Q.

>>2050323

On this graphic with order, all this mirror stuff almost gives me a headache, I'll survive. On the order of seconds try this way

45,15

44,16,46,14

43,17,47,13

42,18,48,12

41,19,49,11

40,20,50,10

39,21,51,09

38,22,52,08

37,23,53,07

36,24,54,06

35,25,55,05

34,26,56,04

33,27,57,03

32,28,58,02

31,29,59,01

30,00

>>2050600

Had to verify the new ordering, and left the [:45:XX] & [:15:XX] markers in the table for now so you can have a look as well (and maybe faster find them in your archive)

>>2051086

Guess there's an error … :45:44 should be listed before :45:14 I guess?

>>2050600

Shouldn't be trying to do things when I can't focus. Give up for tonight. Might check the new ordering tomorrow, once I find time. Wish a good nite for now to y'all!

>>2051086

Min & Sec have mirror order to each other

up is down, left is right. I've had a sneaking suspicion it's capable of even more you can see some of it when I was playing with the timestamps up above & had already been doing it.

Thank you so much! You're help has been invaluable! Ironed out what not to include "#". I'm thinking stringers aren't to be included, I remember Q saying something that seemed interesting at the time that made me think hidden message wouldn't include them.

I will list all sets [min]<secfrom graphic to make it easier to reference. The way it comes out looks to be readable in reverse too.

up is down, up=down

<00>[00] <30>[30]

[59]<01>[01]<59>[31]<29>[29]<31>

[58]<02>[02]<58>[32]<28>[28}<32>

[57]<03>[03]<57>[33]<27>[27]<33>

[56]<04>[04]<56>[34]<26>[26]<34>

[55]<05>[05}<55>[35]<25>[25]<35>

[54]<06>[06]<54>[36]<24>[24]<36>

[53]<07>[07]<53>[37]<23>[23]<37>

[52]<08>[08]<52>[38]<22>[22]<38>

[51]<09>[09]<51>[39]<21>[21]<39>

[50]<10>[10]<50>[40]<20>[20]<40>

[49]<11>[09]<49>[41]<19>[19]<41>

[48]<12>[08]<48>[42]<18>[18]<42>

[47]<13>[07]<47>[43]<17>[17]<43>

[46]<14>[06]<46>[44]<16>[16]<44>

[45]<15 [15]<45>

>>2051086

>>2052729 Fixing typo's

<00>[00] [30]<30>

[59]<01>[01]<59>[31]<29>[29]<31>

[58]<02>[02]<58>[32]<28>[28}<32>

[57]<03>[03]<57>[33]<27>[27]<33>

[56]<04>[04]<56>[34]<26>[26]<34>

[55]<05>[05}<55>[35]<25>[25]<35>

[54]<06>[06]<54>[36]<24>[24]<36>

[53]<07>[07]<53>[37]<23>[23]<37>

[52]<08>[08]<52>[38]<22>[22]<38>

[51]<09>[09]<51>[39]<21>[21]<39>

[50]<10>[10]<50>[40]<20>[20]<40>

[49]<11>[11]<49>[41]<19>[19]<41>

[48]<12>[12]<48>[42]<18>[18]<42>

[47]<13>[13]<47>[43]<17>[17]<43>

[46]<14>[14]<46>[44]<16>[16]<44>

[45]<15>[15]<45>

>>2051854

>>2052761

I'm with you, shouldn't either, only had "naps" for the last few days, catching up fast.

Wanted to maker sure I explained that the [30]<30created timestamp is just 30:30 & for xx:00:00

>>2051086

It appears you guys are missing info to my non autistic eyes.

Possible info to make complete sentences complete to be found in POTUS tweets?

Here is a graphic non experiment of what it looks like from table in time travelers guide (not reversed bc non experiment).

Read each row top to bottom

Read left to right, more rows will complete picture, also 2 q chapters one meaning as in attached graphic, with dark (?)

>>2053845

>>2053845

>>2053845

>>2053845

>>2053845

I meant to say READ RIGHT to Left

Posting the updated clockfags' QClock for the nr of tweets (realDonaldTrump). Wasn't able to check all breads, thus assume the General's dough is up to date, and Q didn't post since 07/04.

>>2046236

Thanks show off Anon.

Any chance you could do some of the mirrors? Opposite time stamp. Perhaps in contrasting colours?

Am hotel wifi fagging. Got to get my fix of the Blues this weekend.

WWG1WGA

Hope I can meet some of you Anons when this is over to buy you a beer. Well deserved.

>>2054756

Qlocking out for vacation. Talk to you all soon. God bless and carry on, Patriots.

>>2054933

Enjoy your vacations, Anon! Jealous a little ….

Looks like things are coming to a head slowly around here – let's hope at least that we have it figured out by the time you're back!

>>2052729

Thank you very much for the lists – in the process of re-analyzing those for the things I'm missed out on so far. Haven't really done much, to be honest, except follow what I could gather from your work mostly – so thanks to you much more!!

This is really harder than rocket science for me and I do know a little about science & rockets … lol – but this here I have to learn all anew making the process quite slow. There's lots of things a can't say or ask, and typing/reading online is a much less appropriate method for communication/learning than brainstorming w/ a beer on the table lol.

At any rate, unless someone suggests that I shouldn't continue gathering the crumbs in this way, I'll try and reproduce these lists like >>2053879 and hope to have some results by later today. I think i'm getting closer to understanding how last and I might have to be treated – but no guarantees … lol Thanks again.

>>2053879

I think I can see it!

>>2033595

Thanks for posting the TTG. Made sense when I saw the columns of shared timestamps.

>>2053879

Very excited to see where this train of thought leads us. Keep up the great work, you're getting close to cracking it.

The clock is the device that's going to point us towards a specific selection of posts/lines/words in order to construct a new message. Wonderful!

Gotta get some rest but hope to contribute some graphics tomorrow.

>>2055401

see, icymi

>>2052761 <-here

2nd column bottom typos fixed

You're Awesome Anon! (That name may catch on ;)) Forgot to mention how great it is to have the (timestamp) shown too, imagine the possibilities!! for reordering by hand for testing additional mirroring. Is=, after the table is done we can test for reading like the QClock reading the dates, down, up, down/left, right, left..

>>2055402

Love that graphic, yes it's the [timestamps]

I'll update the QClock dates, like in the crop dark_here.png >>2053845 now that it does look like end of a chapter(not quartered clock)/quarter(quartered clock) From what we can see with Oct. 18[15] or Oct. 21[18]

>>2031990

That is a work of art! You know what it looks like, Time Travel in Light Speed!

Chess fag 7/12 interesting.

>>2040397

You can see the order here

>>2052761

>>2033796 Note up is down down is up, shown with Red text reading down up, when combing all for larger message keep table order for results as in here >>2053879 >>2053845

>>2059347

>>2059692

QCLOCK visual

Mirror see what happens when you take the last/end */\ and mirror it, the timestamps match the first/start. left is right. up is down.

>>2060181

>>2059692

It's about the BREAK

>>2053879

Current state, previous was missing <00><30>

added [58][02]

[00][30] will add in next update

>>2061748

>>2052761

>>2055401

Having the timestamps with the word so we can line up like the picture. Do you see how them timestamps [59][01][31][29] look like the cipher machine?

<00>[00] [30]<30>

[59]<01>[01]<59>[31]<29>[29]<31>

[58]<02>[02]<58>[32]<28>[28}<32>

[57]<03>[03]<57>[33]<27>[27]<33>

>>2061940

It does indeed. And if one gets the order of the post correctly onto the rolls, one could start "typing" … lol

>>2059347

Thank you. lol. Think many of us Anons are awesome, also I believe there's another one w/ that name already. Happy about being a simple clockfag (and planefag sometimes too).

With the two chapters – I thought so much already when seeing the graphic that had this "*/\/*/\" and figure (from the length of time) that the first two could be until July, the last one until later (whenever that might be). Wasn't able to completely figure it out though – will have to have a look at it again and think a little harder.

As for the [01:XX] word collection, there's a couple of things I noticed:

When Q referenced himself, these last words were included as well.

Some [01:XX] markers were not included, even though they seemed valid.

I excluded one post (which was deleted – the 0Hour one). Still I appear to have too many compared to what you got.

There was the "clever" () & "COINCIDENCE?" (13:59:38) in the image – both didn't have a matching timestamp. While "clever" references a Q post, COINCIDENCE does not.

So when Q references himself in a matching post this appears to have been included. When a non-matching Q post references a matching one – you think should be included too ?

There's also the ordering for timestamps of the same kind (e.g. [01:36]) – In attached image they are ordered chronologically … maybe I should order them by the "calendarTime" (i.e. [:MM]) on the Q-Clock instead?

>>2053879

the [:17] catches I had & also the reset at [:01:36] both have dates that, if nt mistaken are all between [:50] & [:00] on the clock.

Reminds remotely of "-10 days" – w/o having checked others for this. Maybe those are the ones you didn't include and I caught ?

>>2062164

Are the "+" the same as "#"? We removed them, but I'm glad you included them for a full picture. It's almost like layers that if you only read going down/up *=message, only read @=message +=message. There has to be a reason Q replied to Q, if not this something else. Hmm, but reading across there would be duplication.

There are so many factors to consider. To keep my sanity when doing these columns I listed multiples in the order of search/newest.

if you can do more columns[min] just like this, we can get a better view across what happens.

>>2062448

The "#" have been removed. "+" are "self-references" in a matching Q post, meaning when Q made a reference to one of his previous posts. It seemed to me you included those as well.

>>2062448

I think there were a number of "here" 's which made me assume you included these post when Q referenced a previous Q post.

>>2062448

It might have been the "all" 's instead of the "here" 's – found them both quite numerous and had difficulties associating them.

Took out the "+" again right now, and am missing an "all"

>>2062670

I may have some"#" left over, or even just missed some, lost my place more times than I can count, your program will be more accurate than my human error.

>>2062448

Reordered them as in the image (w/ 00 & 30). All starting with ">" I missed out on, all in the bottom I have too much

Took out the "+"-prefixed ones out of the script again.

14-Feb-2018 19:01:01 (EST)==>59:01 1776.(:01:01)

*21-Nov-2017 20:18:17 (EST)==>31:29 Storm(:01:29)

@21-Nov-2017 20:18:17 (EST)==>31:29 Targets?

*07-Mar-2018 16:08:15 (EST)==>29:31 person?(:01:31)

@07-Mar-2018 16:08:15 (EST)==>29:31 over.

*19-Apr-2018 20:05:21 (EST)==>29:31 Related(:01:31)

@19-Apr-2018 20:05:21 (EST)==>29:31 captured?

> COINCIDENCES ?

21-Dec-2017 12:01:03 (EST)==>57:03 coincidences.(:01:03)

26-Apr-2018 14:01:03 (EST)==>57:03 redactions.(:01:03)

27-Jun-2018 16:01:56 (EST)==>04:56 day!(:01:56)

01-Feb-2018 02:01:55 (EST)==>05:55 Eberwein(:01:55)

*09-Mar-2018 06:16:07 (EST)==>06:54 legitimate.(:01:54)

@09-Mar-2018 06:16:07 (EST)==>06:54 soap.

07-Jan-2018 23:01:24 (EST)==>36:24 President.(:01:24)

21-Apr-2018 12:01:36 (EST)==>24:36 all.(:01:36)

> clever.

>all

06-Apr-2018 17:01:36 (EST)==>24:36 Purpose.(:01:36)

30-Nov-2017 01:01:36 (EST)==>24:36 reset.(:01:36)

*14-May-2018 21:18:27 (EST)==>53:07 all.(:01:07)

04-Dec-2017 22:01:07 (EST)==>53:07 Christmas.(:01:07)

11-Feb-2018 20:01:37 (EST)==>23:37 prepped.(:01:37)

23-Nov-2017 00:01:22 (EST)==>38:22 important.(:01:22)

15-Feb-2018 16:01:38 (EST)==>22:38 WEEK.(:01:38)

*18-Jun-2018 23:04:34 (EST)==>22:38 AM(:01:38)

@18-Jun-2018 23:04:34 (EST)==>22:38 here.

>WEEK.

>#Goodbye#

*06-Dec-2017 21:03:11 (EST)==>39:21 when?(:01:21)

@06-Dec-2017 21:03:11 (EST)==>39:21 Shutdown.

21-Nov-2017 19:01:21 (EST)==>39:21 EVERYTHING.(:01:21)

*10-Nov-2017 16:04:51 (EST)==>21:39 5th(:01:39)

@10-Nov-2017 16:04:51 (EST)==>21:39 Correct.

18-Jun-2018 23:01:50 (EST)==>10:50 HIGH.(:01:50)

26-Apr-2018 21:01:50 (EST)==>10:50 require…..(:01:50)

*10-Mar-2018 17:08:19 (EST)==>20:40 damage?(:01:40)

@10-Mar-2018 17:08:19 (EST)==>20:40 used.

27-Jan-2018 16:01:40 (EST)==>20:40 DUMB.(:01:40)

*22-May-2018 13:04:35 (EST)==>11:49 them.(:01:49)

@22-May-2018 13:04:35 (EST)==>11:49 happening.

04-May-2018 15:01:19 (EST)==>41:19 CONF(:01:19)

>collection

*07-Feb-2018 21:08:09 (EST)==>19:41 permission.(:01:41)

@07-Feb-2018 21:08:09 (EST)==>19:41 plan.

19-Jun-2018 15:01:12 (EST)==>48:12 day.(:01:12)

*22-Feb-2018 20:47:30 (EST)==>12:48 be.(:01:48)

@22-Feb-2018 20:47:30 (EST)==>12:48 comms.

12-Feb-2018 10:01:46 (EST)==>14:46 JFK.(:01:46)

02-Nov-2017 02:01:46 (EST)==>14:46 tomorrow.(:01:46)

07-Dec-2017 20:01:44 (EST)==>16:44 wild.(:01:44)

*04-Dec-2017 23:07:17 (EST)==>28:32 website.(:01:32)

04-Dec-2017 22:01:07 (EST)==>53:07 thinking.

19-Jun-2018 22:01:38 (EST)==>22:38 safe.(:01:38)

22-May-2018 13:01:41 (EST)==>19:41 failed.(:01:41)

04-Dec-2017 23:01:17 (EST)==>43:17 #FLYROTHSFLY#(:01:17)

*06-Apr-2018 16:05:43 (EST)==>43:17 WWG1WGA(:01:17)

@06-Apr-2018 16:05:43 (EST)==>43:17 WORLD.

*15-Feb-2018 14:12:42 (EST)==>17:43 Snowden(:01:43)

@15-Feb-2018 14:12:42 (EST)==>17:43 liability.

These are the ones I have too many and didn't find in your image:

>*04-Dec-2017 23:07:17 (EST)==>28:32 website.(:01:32)

^^Mention w/ the "RED" image (see you in Seoul) Mention has good timestamp

>04-Dec-2017 22:01:07 (EST)==>53:07 thinking.

^^ No idea how that got in … will double check and remove

>19-Jun-2018 22:01:38 (EST)==>22:38 safe.(:01:38)

^^Valid matching Q post …

>22-May-2018 13:01:41 (EST)==>19:41 failed.(:01:41)

^^ Matching Q post but w/ not good word … lol

>04-Dec-2017 23:01:17 (EST)==>43:17 #FLYROTHSFLY#(:01:17)

^^Matching timestamp in Q post, but has special char – maybe remove special char, then next word above would be "Relevant."

>*06-Apr-2018 16:05:43 (EST)==>43:17 WWG1WGA(:01:17)

^^Might count as a signature and is a mention w/ correct timestamp – could be removed?

>@06-Apr-2018 16:05:43 (EST)==>43:17 WORLD.

^^Q post to above WWG1WGA (mention)

>*15-Feb-2018 14:12:42 (EST)==>17:43 Snowden(:01:43)

^^post is a mention w/ matching timestamp

>@15-Feb-2018 14:12:42 (EST)==>17:43 liability.

^^Q post to above matching mention

Bread is still empty, so one more list … lol

Those that I missed out on:

>COINCIDENCE?

^^Q post stamped: 03-Jul-2018 13:59:38 – maybe a remainder from a previous :59 run in your work?

>clever.

Q post stamped: 21-Apr-2018 12:02:17 –

^^Self-reference to back to matching Q post

>all

^^ The last word in above back-referenced matching Q post. Matching Q post was stamped 21-Apr-2018 12:01:36, but has no forward ref (i.e. >>) to "clever"

>WEEK.

^^"WEEK." appeared twice in your image

>#Goodbye#

^^Q post w/ stamp 15-Feb-2018 16:09:29

References back to Q post from: 15-Feb-2018 16:01:38, which has "WEEK." as last word. No forward ref from there to "Goodbye#

>collection.

^^ 1st word in valid Q post, where I extracted "failed".

>>2062980

I remember the #FLYROTHFLY# was in there before, multiples in the same all :17 & all :43, copy & paste error. Your program caught them, thank God, running on empty over here.

>>2063192

I did just fix the "thinking" bug, so it's out of the list. You think of those that I had too many should stay in?

… and back-references, i.e. when a non-matching (or matching) Q post references back to a previous Q post, like many in >>2063158 – you think I should use them as well?

Tomorrow will also have to think about ordering multiple matches for a single timestamp, eg the mess with the [01:36]'s and the others. Got late again, but will work on it all day tomorrow.

Also, anons asked for a software in the general today – could do that, but would first like to fully understand/foqus on this thing (and the enigma) before I start coding anything.

It indeed stands to assume that the Q-Clock is the cipher wheel/key which unlocks the "map".

>>2054017

Thanks anon, appreciate this.

>>2063766

yw. it's from early morning though – am in the process of checking breads and tweets and might post an updated version a little later.

>>2063824

Alright sounds good,

I'll check the thread every now and then and whenever you post an updated one I'll replace the one I just got.

>>2063540

Maybe all of them to order by category *,@,#, +?

Just a rough of what happens

[01]

meaning 00

anti-breitbart 00*

39 00 @

info 30

James 30

awakening. 30

service. 30 +

1776 01

Storm 29 *

Targets? @

person? 31 *

over. 31 @

Related 31 *

captured? @

website. 03

redations. 03

day! 56

DAY. 56 +

Eberwein 55

legimate 54 *

soap. @

President. 24

reset. 36

Purpose. 36

all. 36

Christmas 07

thinking. 07

all. 07*

prepped. 37

important. 22

WEEK. 38

OFFLINE +

AM 38*

here. 38 @

safe. 27

EVERTHING. 21

when? 21*

Shutdown. 21 @

5th 39 *

Correct. 39 @

require….. 50

HIGH. 50

DUMG. 40

damage? 40*

used. 40 @

them. 49 *

happening. 49 @

CONF 19

permission. 41 *

plan. 41 @

failed. 41

day. 12

be. 48 *

comms. 48 @

#FLYROTHSFLY# 17

WWG1WGA 17 *

WORLD. 17 @

Snowden 43 *

liability. 43 *

tomorrow. 46

JFK. 46

wild. 44

(another reverse read?)

meaning 00

info 30

James 30

awakening. 30

1776 01

website. 03

redations. 03

day! 56

Eberwein 55

President. 24

reset. 36

Purpose. 36

all. 36

Christmas 07

thinking. 07

prepped. 37

important. 22

WEEK. 38

safe. 27

EVERTHING. 21

require….. 50

HIGH. 50

DUMB. 40

CONF 19

failed. 41

day. 12

#FLYROTHSFLY# 17

tomorrow. 46

JFK. 46

wild. 44

anti-breitbart 00*

Storm 29 *

person? 31 *

Related 31 *

legimate 54 *

all. 07*

when? 21*

damage? 40*

permission. 41 *

be. 48 *

WWG1WGA 17 *

Snowden 43 *

liability. 43 *

39 00 @

Targets? @

over. 31 @

captured? @

soap. @

here. 38 @

Shutdown. 21 @

Correct. 39 @

used. 40 @

happening. 49 @

plan. 41 @

comms. 48 @

WORLD. 17 @

(read down up?)

service. 30 +

DAY. 56 +

OFFLINE 38 +

>>2063952

>>2063540

(another reverse read?) s/b under

meaning 00

info 30

James 30

awakening. 30

1776 01

website. 03

redations. 03

day! 56

Eberwein 55

President. 24

reset. 36

Purpose. 36

all. 36

Christmas 07

thinking. 07

prepped. 37

important. 22

WEEK. 38

safe. 27

EVERTHING. 21

require….. 50

HIGH. 50

DUMB. 40

CONF 19

failed. 41

day. 12

#FLYROTHSFLY# 17

tomorrow. 46

JFK. 46

wild. 44

>>2063996

That's a good idea, thank you. Will check during the day tomorrow and may try to run four of them, making that table and then playing with the ordering. One might be able to see which makes most sense, when combined w/ the others (i.e. 59, 01, 31, 29 – the "Z" as I came to call it, lol)

>>2063540

This could be one way to isolate timestamps one reason to reply to self or Anons.

>>2064129

There's lots of other things I need to go over tomorrow (also, e.g. the */\/*/\ thing) Checked bread & Q didn't post, so I'll update tweets 'morrow only …

I'm out for this night … Thanks very much for the help again!! A peaceful good nite everone!

>>2064279

>>2064091

There is a space in there

/\/\ /\

Sounds good, sleep well Anon!

>>2064091

Timestamp matched posts Q and Anons. Look what happens when you group them accordingly, two more messages!?

>>2064091

>>2065347

*=matched anon posts

Am I doing this right?

>>2068173

This looks beautiful, thanks! Makes it easier to understand the principle behind it in this graphic form than just from the lists above.

This is so exciting! It's like someone said in the previous thread:

"The map is going to be beautiful."

>>2068247

Thanks OG clockhomo.

Someone else said "Beauty is surely one of the 6 or seven things the map should have."

Where's the :59 second marker?

Thought i'd find it at 01/05 [29], 03/06 [29], 05/05 [29] or 07/04 [29] but I can't see it…

>>2021597

here you go. clockwork Q

>>2068463

That'd be clockfag – nothing to do with no homo, except when it comes to sapiens.

You guys are so amazing with graphics – it'd take me a week to just produce sth half as good. So I better not even try … lol.

What do you mean the [59] marker? You mean a list containing the words that go with it?

>>2068628

lol! Sorry! I've been staring at numbers for too long… starting to get confused. You're right though, this would be much easier with a beer at the pub.

>>2068930

Would be a hillarious picture: graphicfags, computerfags, shitpostingfags, chessfags and all talking dirty & "conspiracy" stuff while getting loaded …. LOL

Working on an image to get the four markers 59, 01 31 & 29 together – but haven't played around with the sorting yet.

>>2055401

Without doxxing yourself, can I ask about your rocketfagging experience? I'm interested because i've done a bit of rocket surgery myself…

>>2068628

Good idea to expand our LISTening.

Looking forward to sorting out *,@,#, + and making moar graphics.

>>2069067

No direct experience – university lectures in physics at a university w/ a professor who liked it. That's why I said "a little", meaning I'm familiar w/ the basic principles, and solved the underlying equations back then … lol. Sorry, didn't mean to mislead.

All you clock anons-I'm so very impressed with your genius talents. Please feel free to use the spreadsheet that I've been keeping of all timestamps from Q and @RealDJT tweets since the inception of Q. It includes matching hours, matching minutes, matching seconds, and matching deltas of Q and matching hours, minutes, and deltas of @RealDJT tweets since 10/28/17. I try to keep it updated and current.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit?usp=sharing

>>2068628

Here's all the Q postings with 59 seconds if that's what you're asking clock anon.

>>2070366

>>2070336

That's very kind of both of you! Thank you.

There is, however, this archive >>2027173

which unfortunately is the only one that allows me to do this kind of work, w/o having to do it post by post manually.

Thing is, there are certain kinks & rules in this Q-Clock "game", so that it is much more effective – for this (possibly) very large number of words to extract & combine(!) from (almost) arbitrarily different posts – to use a local archive w/ a consistent syntax/format.

Even the text/ascii archives wouldn't be optimal in my view, also not online resources as qanon.pub – would all take much too long and not have the right format to only once create an algorithm, which then runs for all kinds of markers & timestamps.

Will use other resources however, when searching for example deleted posts, which might be in above archive, but not in the "standard" references. Thanks again!

The individual min columns in sec sorting order have easy to see messages when additionally sorted by Q vs A matching timestamp posts. We may need to wait a bit more for more Q posts to get a clearer picture of when all combine horizontal message, but will take my best guess with it as to what's missing/not posted. Also, there are 2 more every other column so maybe shift two or one. Reading directions may be left right right left left right for across. up down up down if columns/min flow across this way too.

>>2068981

Here is just a plain one, wanted to note that if up is down left is right & mirror the lines on the right side of the clock could be a different color than on the left. Didn't get fancy when I did [00][30]&[15][45] ←not sorting order for [MIN] just chronological order for clock graphics, which was just a simple straight line in one color, maybe two thinner different color together for 00&30, 15&45 each side one color?

Some progress (not full, crop)

>>2072472

>>2072545

Going to play with Upper vs Lowercase

>>2072743

What the hell? You guys are idiots. Half the posters are thanking OP for making a shitty thread and the other half are posting terrible memes, while the third half is trying to arrange qposts to make more sense. Evaluate yourselves, you could run for office in your own town and actually change things with all this effort.

>>2072943

>arrange qposts

No, there is a set order

It is a matter of what to include what not to include

Isn't it funny, I'm no Justin Bieber fan, but I don't have a need to start berating fans.

Any fellow clock fag have a link to the active thread since the catalog is down again?

>>2073241

go to bread Q Research General #2613: Echo Location, ctrl F, new bread, the post that shows up has a dead end link, but look at one of the last replies to that post and the correct link is in there, it leads to a post that may already be completed which means another ctrl F for new bread to get to the lastest one. Fun!

>>2073274

Got it! Thanks. Back in the loop.

As of the time of this post this is the current bread for following crumbs until something changes on the catalog page.

8ch.net/qresearch/res/2074017.html#2074017

>>2073387

Happy to help!

>>2074177

Thank you so much!! – sorry, had been falling asleep in between and codefagging too much again … Catalog broken, probably for a reason…. Let's hope it leads to less gay porn in the bread, lol.

>>2063158

Have been working on the "backwards" linked messages and made things a little easier for me by creating a list of all posts and how they link, if they do.

Longest link I believe is seven long (by postID):

894699→894658→894571→894467→894401→894110→893904

(backward is forward in time/postID, meaning msg 894699 has a [>>]894658)

This way when I searching for these backwards links I can just look it up in the list, w/o having to do all the same routines over and over.

Also, I wasn't sure how many backwards linked msg would be allowed/required. What if, say postID 893904 has a matching timestamp – maybe it turns out I'd have to go back all the way to 894699 !? Not much of a problem now, if needed.

The sorting is easy – depending on what makes sense, I can any time apply any order to "@", "+", or "#" (even though for now we've discarded "#". That is, when we order them by prefix (and not time).

Posting the [:01] again for visual inspection. Used >>2061940 for comparison – it's a match when not taking order into account, and these few which we had talked about already:

# found "meaning" instead of you "awakening"

# found "safe"

# I found "failed" when you had "collection"

Will now re-check, if changes I made broke maybe [:15] or [:29] or so … lol, but will be around for a while, and also see if I can find the general (thanks again!)

>>2075462

Funny you say backwards which oddly seemed natural

remember how the order 59:01 01:59.. was obtained,

the "special" 15 min Q post.

[15] min Q post seconds 1-59 in order, last line of post

process reversed for [min]

Together the min & sec (in order 1-59) created timestamps 59:01 01:59…

Confirmed by Q posts with those timestamps matched the last line.

Example 59:12 ([15]min 12 sec last line snap) Q post at 59:12 "Q HAND GESTURE WAT."

15:45 timestamp yielded "Special" line up matched

Up is down, down is up, it reads both ways using only matching timestamp posts so far, via up and down in the individual timestamps, but testing across the reverse reads better at 01:59 59:01, time will tell with newer postings. I don't have enough columns of the mins completed to finish testing lining across by<sec>. Also haven't done enough testing on the *+@, but looks interesting!

On different results for last word, I'd lean towards what your programming picks up. I'll go back to see what may have happened.

>>2075462

>>2076614

>reads both ways using only matching timestamp posts so far,

Meaning All the [01] , same min column.

>>2076614

Like I mentioned before, not rarely I get signs/directions wrong, so inadvertently I do things backwards. With the clock, like you said, it is still confusing sometimes, to remember which is which ….

I hope I'll have a large (all?) the character substitutions ready, and all the things that are consistently invalid (i.e to be deleted), like links etc. – links are a pain a bit, they are quite inconsistent.

Image names are hard to catch, when one doesn't want to do a dictinary search to determine if it is a word. So some manual editing would probably have to be done, but I'll try and run some more markers and see how far I'll get, and how consistency looks like currently with the script.

Would probably be easier for you too, if I ran & posted them (incl. timestamps) one by one, and then we, and some other anons, could verify them or check them. Would that save time/work?

Current General Bread almost full

8ch.net/qresearch/res/2076403.html#2077063

>>2076403

>>2076869

That would be great. Pretty soon you'll be cranking them out! :)

>>2077131

Cranking already … lol. well the little computer is. For a test only to recognize systematic errors. There 's quite a number of cases when post were back-referenced "+" more than once. I'll fix this tomorrow, shouldn't be too difficult. Will likely also exclude all post where last line is a stringer.

I'm imagining printing out one by one and then trying to put them together like a puzzle maybe, to find a consistent way to order & combine them.

>>2077220

Example of lined up across(though shown in a column) by second including multiples of same second.

Current General Bread (almost full) >>2077220

Current General Bread (almost full) >>2077939

Current General Bread >>2078788

>>2078724

Included _ for now just to see the difference both ways, seems to read fine as, "today? 2 End." I would say code to which way is ever easiest.

>>2078724

Good Morning clockfags & a beautiful Sunday to y'all! First thanks for the updates on the bread – very much appreciated as I indeed lost track.

Caught up on what's going on there before falling asleep …. mayhem! lol

Will have a tab open for the most current now. So can follow the links if baker posts them.

>>2078892

Will continue now fixing the bugs I noted in that test run yesterday, and also keep an eye open open on what's happening here (and there). Got the new chapter too (thanks!) t'was [:31]+[2] – how good I wouldn't have to learn that language all anew! Godspeed!

>>2077131

It's cranking! Lol. w/o technical errors until [:17].

Will have to remove some more of the weblinks that got caught. Posting example for [:41] from a previous run, raw as it comes out in a table.

Will have lunch ( and dessert ;) ), and then iron out these last little things, plus will review them one by one and check for accurate order.

Anyone else concerned this process taking over the Qlock board is a giant slide?

Can someone explain to me in simple-ish terms the verification for this process?

I have seen the confusing graphics, someone give me some hope here. Love you Qlock fags just not keeping up with what’s going on and I’m trying.

Hey clockfags, thank you guys for your work, its just as important as digging, but a lot more complicated, so I'm here to help.

My tip is more of a countdown then a clock, however I'm not really sure what it is counting down to. There may have been a few other clock clues that could give it away.

So first on June 10th, two days before the NK summit in his first post in a week Q says, Start the Clock. A Week to [Remember]."

There is a purpose the remember is in brackets. Future proves past.

Why did Q say Flynn done in 30?

This is what he wanted us to remember.

He has a court date on Tuesday the 10th.

30 days before that would be June 10th, when Q posted to start the clock.

Tuesday is also the public testimony of Peter Strzok in front of the House judiciary committee.

Then he followed with 'A Week To Remember'.

He's also posted about the 30 day clock before.

May 13th he said, "Why are D’s slow-walking POTUS’ FED J nominations? Watch what happens [-30]."

Now I could make a lot of other points that make me believe the next week or two will be huge, but I don't really have an idea of what will happen, so I'll leave that to you guys.

>>2083612

First off, this is a thread, the board's name is /qresearch/

Which brings me to your question: We do research on the crumbs Q has given to us, specifically the many mentions of clocks, of winding them & of mirrors in Q's crumbs.

The quintessence of the answer is actually stated up above in the dough to this bread, specifically the 1st & last sentences therein.

It could be a slide but not so giant in fact. The giantest slide would be codename Q turning out to be a larp. But we were there already, and are still here – and chances increase that this "slide" of the giantest nature is none (see the various threads for Q proofs etc).

We're not concernfags, and there's plenty of indications that the clock actually is real.

As to the clock & what's being done: Without explaining to you the complete history of the Q-Clock (I will if you insist), the working hypothesis is that the clock, if used in a certain way, reveals, or better said, points out things within the crumbs (which we have all) that would improve or even extend our understanding of what Q actually has given to us (in terms of information).

The list in e.g. >>2083448 results from a certain way to group messages by timestamps & extracting the last words of these. These last words are then ordered and combined in a certain way, so that they start making sense in the combination that results from the process of correctly selecting & combining them.

In short – "think mirror" – the clock groups the minute markers around it [:MM] outside the clock ( >>2054017 , or outside the colored circle in >>2031990 ← check equal colors) into groups of four, which are related via their mirror-symmetry.

Think a "Z" drawn into the clock for example, and the "Z" in such way that you start at [:59], then move to [:01] (these two are mirror symmetric via a vertical axis axis), then go down to [:31] and over to [:29] (pic related read from top, & left to right).

This may be just one aspect of the clock, there are also others, like the arrangement of days calendar days around it, and how these days are connected via happenings in the current day, past days (or likely even future days).

Now I'll have dessert – don't be shy to ask moar, these things are hard to grasp by lurqing only ;).

Catch up for those jumping in in the middle

>>2083612

>simple-ish terms

see >>2076614 for run down explanation and graphic >>2021755 updated clock going forward if not ended and in darkness going into Q chapter [2] >>2060181 & >>2060460

See graphic for visual of what the cipher looks like.

>>2083448

Awesome! Just checking in board right now, have to some things before I can jump back in.

>>2084486

Well said.

The slides are usually the slide concernfags from what I can see. Made a catch up rely for the real Anons.

>>2085262

Thanks. Was just thinking about how to put it even simpler – but that's a bit hard w/o leaving out things or stating them less clear.

Still cleaning links, stringers etc, but "it cranks" so far (haven't done all yet) …. will post a couple of lists once done.

>>2085145

Clock update or wind back if you will to where I thought it may end before.

Ending on [15] did not =11

Ending on [29] 2+11=11

End Q chpt 1 7/4[29]:[29] 11/1 end chpt 2/clock

Now we get 2 11:11 also 29:11

Also, we get the mirror with the chapters that continue the clock 29 to 28,27,26 & 15 to 16,15,14 that continues the clock like a fitted puzzle piece as in when I was playing with the markers (scroll above)

>>2087420

TYPO

2+9=11

>>2087420

Thank will have when done, because I thought about the ordering of "same-markered" matches like partially mentioned in >>2063952

Also had a look at >>2061748 …. I think you did this: It would make more sense (maybe) to order the finds by the markers the day of the post had on the clock.

In your [:31] example you have "deserve", "111", "fact", "believers". By their date and marker on the clock, those would be [:58], [:28], [:53], [:16], which is exactly in order of the <sec>. Since single words are listed in teh same order, it would make sense to me to order multiples in the same way, just instead use their date on the clock ….

You ordered them this way, right?

>>2087702

*Thank you, will have a look when done.

Apologies, getting tired again … lol

>>2087420

Did Q team ask? Coincidence?

>>2087702

Me too, my take out is long cold, yum! Sorry haven't had a chance to look over that last list and your last post, but looks interesting. Getting some fuel/food into me then I will focus on your last post. :)

>>2088194

Thanks very much, no worries. The script runs so far – I just thought I'd better the in some way so it makes sense, before running all of them. I'll have the idea with the calendarDay markers and ordering multiples by them finished and posted as another example, before I fall asleep … ;)

>>2088279

Yes, would love to see it, any ideas you have are greatly welcomed on my end!

>>2087702

>instead use their date on the clock

Okay, let's see if I can focus even though my only meal of the day was cold & had to deal with drama on my end that refused to wait for me to eat—rant done, lol. Do you mean list oldest drop 1st when more than 1 in <sec>? Yes, I it should be that way, I was listing in order of search 1of4 bc it was easier.

>>2088793

Sorry to hear … I probably finish for today soonish, and continue tomorrow … lol

Ok, for now the words are ordered after <secas in the pic above >>2084486

This makes sense, but I could also try ordering by [min] from your list above >>2052761 – but for now let's not do that.

My question was related to multiple finds of say (for marker [:31]) and matching ":31:00", there are three valid finds ("deserve", "III" & "fact"). How to order these ?

So I thought by date, and not human date, but the marker each of the multiple finds' date has on the Q-Clock. as in attached pic (1st col) where "deserve" is [:58], "III" is date [:28] and "fact" is [:23].

One could also try ordering all of them, i.e the whole list (not just multiples) by their date in such manner.

>>2088920

pic … sorry

>>2088920

>>2088793

Here's another two tables before I'll have to rest.

Words are ordered as in >>2061940

Only that multiple matches for one marker were ordered by days (i.e. the order of <sec>, as if the days on the Q-Clock (i.e. the markers [:XX] around it) were also <sec>.

I have something written which would allow me (w/o too much fiddling) to order the complete word list by days as well. Can try that tomorrow, to see what see what this would look like.

For now, I hope you're not starving too much … ;) , and I wish a relaxing Good Night!

>>2088920

>>2088922

I see, very very interesting!!

>>2089267

These are awesome, digging in now…

Sleep well Anon, extra dessert for you every day for the rest of the year!

Current Bread #2635 >>2089061

>>2088922

31:54 comp'd & safe/auth. missing, unless I just missed it.

I mentioned about possible instructions in Q posts, I think these are it. Pic/graphic titles, I think these are instructions as a multiple meaning to not include them (in [31] ex. large, IIIIII), " Linked graphics are incorrect and false."

Stringers, I think these are instructions as a multiple meaning, "What were the keywords in the stringer?", "Why were keywords added in the stringer?

What was the purpose?

What was previously stated?

To who specifically?", What was posted prior to the stringer?

What keywords were within the stringer?

Why would keywords be left in the stringer?", "Why was that STRINGER sent out?

Decode.", "Stringers important." & "Why were keywords provided?

Guide to reading map?"

The stringer and prior word for 31:20 Approval 58203-JX , no keywords in the stringer = use the word prior = Approval.

If we go with this, not sure if it's even possible or even necessary to program, maybe if it pulls up a stringer we can see keywords in it and if none it wouldn't be difficult to look up manually the word prior to, as the list has the second listed.

>>2090544

Back to time traveling (pic related).

Thank you for checking the list – I was getting sloppy a bit yesterday being tired.

"comp'd" & "safe/auth" were missing because they were in a last line starting with "Q", so the entire line got removed as it was considered a signature (fixed now).

"Todd Maklerr" post (word "large") has been added to the exclude-list, as has been the Q post linking to the "lllll" pic.

Also thank you for the reminder w/ the "graphic form" Q gave us – totally slipped my mind to also cross-check these …

Stringers are removed on a case by case basis. Here's a current list of which are deleted so far – when running the markers/lists one by one, I'll add more as needed, if needed:

37875 # 09-Mar-2018 18:30:50 (EST)

[0 0000 018739 7-ZjG] # 14-Feb-2018 18:41:23 (EST)

_SAT-re_Bz985300^00 # 22-Jan-2018 14:05:49 (EST)

_T_1A-23-go5 # 03-Mar-2018 23:08:25 (EST)

/_\ # 27-Jan-2018 00:09:55 (EST)

NATSEC_19384z_A_DT- # 19-Dec-2017 23:12:54 (EST)

58203-JX # 12-Jun-2018 17:31:20 (EST)

Corrected [:31] list accordingly, and will run some more lists maybe to combine a couple a of them and play w/ the ordering as mentioned in >>2088920

LOUD & CLEAR

Current General Bread >>2096624

>>2097059

reason why I highlighted "announced" in the POTUS tweet from today. This one could happen today, but possibly even the dates for these timestamps [56][04][34][26]

>>2097059

>>2097267

the graphic

>>2097059

System broke – had to re-install everything, and then couldn't find the wifi pass which wifey, who's away for three weeks, put someplace else … (facepalm)

Beautiful day … hahaha. Didn't work much, and decided to have a couple of drinks while the sys re-installed. lol.

All good, no loss of data/work, just time. All is back to normal. Thanks so much for the updates! Will be back to usual clockfagging tomorrow, while catching up on things that happened during the day.

Q didn't post. Possibly, that is, as there were these kind of posts (yesterday):

>>2084387 & >>2086098

which I took note of, but won't/can't mark blue on the clock. I'm sure you're aware of these (and I haven't checked yet if there were any today). Nonetheless posting an updated Q-Clock for the realDT tweets.

>>2097059

>>2097267

>>2097277

>>2100019

More QClock news unlocks map proofs (4 shared timestamps see the highlighted sections)

>>2102778

One more

CURRENT GENERAL BREAD >>2103986

>>2104047

Thank you very much – that's the task of the day for now. Reviewing all of them since early morning, specifically combined with >>2087420 , and clock markers as they relate to calendar days.

Also let the script crank out all wordlists during breakfast. There was a single bug, which will be fixed; other than that a couple of more links and stringers to remove/review.

Following the general with one eye on the tab, but mostly for archiving purposes, as I really try to dive into these proofs. Very much appreciated!

>>2104083

You're welcome! See more detailed here

>>2102778

Dropping this off here, working to combine timestamps even more, did POTUS tell us the answer in a tweet?? DATA MINE NP +1 +5

>>2104150

>DATA MINE NP +1 +5

Had this in focus when I thought about a lettering system in the last clock bread >>1746964 , but will check that again.

Just saw POTUS' latest tweet + video -- great tweet & clip. Trying to find it somewhere else as elouai doesn't seem to have it anymore. Looks like it could be a combination of

youtube.com/watch?v=YZ46I3kMOr0 &

youtube.com/watch?v=ahkMA6JPOHU

Good morning Clockfags. Back in the battle after a weekend of R+R.

Today's clock is attached along with seconds markers. Underlined relevant text. WWG1WGA

Theory is seconds marker and reflection are relevant posts for any given day. All these are from the first "rotation".

Wind the clock Anons, we have it all.

>>2105842

Q#1355 "Watch what happens [-30]"

using -30 as minutes offset gets to :07

Q#350/354 "How about a nice game of chess?" noticed because of chess board in above.

Q#741 "No, you’re not." re: RBG

Q seems to be saying RBG is next up. Personally I think if Kavanaugh is confirmed (probable) that Roberts (then the swing vote) moves left. So you would need one more (RBG?) to counter.

Dropped these in the main bread after I lost track of this page.

Very quiet here. Probably a navigation issue.

Just a thought on reflections and deltas.

We need to check the posts that share the seconds marker, those opposite them, and then the current delta on either side of each. Will be six markers every time (and then watch for confirmations in the date/time stamps).

I still think there is a line by line match up that answers all the questions and weaves the story between posts. That was my thoughts on posts halving (there are two separate marker posts in question that need to be match against them).

Anons can help by adding current tweets/news stories to the graphics (anyone could contribute here).

>>2104624

>>2110985

Good to have you back, hope the weekend was a pleasant one. Would have commented earlier, but was being autistic a bit again … lol.

It's quiet here, indeed – always has been a little bit. Haven't checked much of the General, but during the day was bad w/ shilling & disinfo, so I'm content about it being less "bread consuming" here.

Gone over examples provided by Master Clockfag up in >>2102778 and the ones after that.

Am in the process of wrapping things up, as far as I got today in one example, and will post this shortly.

Not sure how much you noticed about about the wordlists up in >>2092014 and further up …. it's about the idea to "decode" Q posts by selecting certain words & certain posts, put them together in the right order, for these to give us new information and/or better understand the information already given to us.

Might need a half an hour or twice that to write together some sentences summing up what I think it is about this time, before I'll check out for tonight and continue tomorrow.

>>2111387

I watch with great interest (and my weekend R+R was awesome).

I think there are many secrets in the clock and the lines. We are still early in getting them all out. I am searching for an across posts (confirmed by time/date stamps) solution and "weave" of the posts. You are searching for something within.

They can both be there (and so much more). I am envious of your programming skills. I am from another generation (I literally punched holes in paper cards at university).

Proud to serve with you Anon.

>>2111486

No worries and thanks a lot. Proud of all of us as well, and very much looking forward to a successful end – will still be some wild ride I suppose until then.

Back to writing some basic things up for us to understand … will be back shortly.

Tomorrows first reflection match. An interesting post at 10 minute delta (#150 to LdR) that was deleted. Only have it on my iCrap device.

Will try to find on this computer and follow up. Posting in main bread as well.

>>2102778

>>2111555

Something went weird – post said "posting …." for whatever not time, but didn't. Happened before, and then later post appeared nonetheless … doesn't look like it this time.

Checking out for today, and quickly checking the general for the Happenings … …. will continue clockfagging seven eleven. lol. G'nite everyone!

Dropped this on main bread. Repost here for any clockfags not currently lurking.

copy/pasta of post:

Tomorrow's first 7 seconds marker has some great posts.

If you search for the word "clock" in QAnon.pub and read all the posts where Q said this you may understand better what we clockfags are doing.

It’s time

Rest of :36 second marker posts.

Too tired to draw all the boxes and lines.

Big day tomorrow. I liked the way these flowed together.

>>2022275

Clockanons-why does clock run clockwise? Did anyone ever reverse it and run counter-clockwise? Reason why I ask is when you wind a clock, it's always wound counter-clockwise. Just a curious lurker her.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit?usp=sharing

Hope at least some of you are using the spreadsheet that has timestamps of Q in hours, minutes, seconds, and same deltas. In addition, it has @RealDJT tweet timestamps in hours and minutes and like deltas.

>>2116715

Yes forwards and backwards.

We have even flipped it vertically and horizontally.

I always check deltas on both sides of marker and its reflection

>>2116818

It is my go to source when making clocks.

Posts by seconds marker. Have to do it manually. Couldn’t manage without the spreadsheet.

Hey Clockfags, anything to the following:

-Trump goes hard on the Germany/Russia energy connection at breakfast

-Trump has pen sitting on table, slightly askew from being parallel to table edge (:16 marker).

• Referring to breakfast topics, POTUS sends two tweets with [17] delta, only difference is an "I" goes missing.

-On QClock, at 16 marker is the 12/23 Q posts about the missing I.

>>2117489

"Germany is a captive a Russia" – uh huh …

Got relatives in that country, and can tell ya (not you, but in general) that Germany for much too long has been a "captive" of the U.S. This is the reason why shit's so fucked up there, not "Muh Russia":

zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-06/germany-decapitating-freedom-press

and this is just one of the last recent examples.

How about uniting with the strong players (Russia surely is one of them), and going after the bad guys together?

What'd be the alternative for Germany & most parts of Europe? Wasting precious resources importing LNG from the U.S., or – even worse – warfagging in the Middle East to be able to build new pipelines in order to take away russian shares in the European market? Sure enough, this is not why I am here! Not saying DJT is doing much warfagging in the ME currently, but those intended pipelines sure were one of the major reasons for going after Syria.

Western Europe (except comparably small resources in the North Sea) has no oil/gas, and this is the reason Russia plays the role as supplier that it has for the last decades. In perspective of the meeting to be held b/w Russia & US, I'm sure these comments today were very helpful </sarc>.

</rant>.

>>2102778

>>2112234

As for the Q Chapters and the theory how to interpret these: There's two of them ("[2] Q Chapters").

The stringer "/\ /* /*", if mirrored, and together with "FLASH_BREAK" says that each Chapter is preceded by a FLASH (the asterisk is the flash), and a break. Also, Chapter One is longer than Chapter Two, has two "/\", compared to Chapter Two. This is also indicated by a simple look on the calendar and comparing the timespan from 12/07 until the supposed end around November.

Could well be that currently we're in one 10 days of darkness phase – the BREAK preceding the new Chapter – and if true Q would re-appear after 07/14, as Chapter One ended 07/04. Attached table, identical to what's been posted in >>2102778 (1st pic), illustrates this.

Not sure yet, why we've got Q posts around 12/07 (1st FLASH_BREAK), but it might have sth to do with "Clock started - 10 days" and/or with the other two times we didn't get Q posts (12/26 – 01/03 & 05/23 – 06/02).

If there's some "word code" intended to be applied to the Q posts, then for Chapter Two we'd also need line numbers in the Q posts. It could be there's one way to extract only last words (as done above, depending on second markers), and another way to extract certain lines, depending on the minute markers of the post & the marker each calendar day has on the Q-Clock.

The hard working sequential filename Anon who put this together didn't post it here.

Always post your clocks HERE as well ClockFags.

Important for requests and discussions of rationale. This is a very complicated graphic. Also save in stages if you can (versions)as you add things in case someone needs a blank.

We can support each other and not duplicate tasks and waste time. I would spend a long time making one of these, is so nice to have others working on them as well.

Here is a 17 delta clock for the main board. Just dropping it here for consistency.

Salute to the Geniuses in this bread. Every time that i see a fresh clock this this Q-uote comes to mind now

>>2117473

Awesome…thank you Anon…nice knowing it's getting some use. I've been keeping it diligently since 11/2.

some days are real promising.

cheers anons

Funny clock from 07/10. Bloody thing is 2 days late!

>>2110985

Thanks for confirming a few things with your pic. I found a few Qposts with interesting timestamps.

Lots of great work happening here. I'm going to study the last word extractions and try and line them up.

>>2126090

The two days late theme is from the rabbit in Alice in Wonderland.

His watch is two days late.

Stupid rabbit.

>>2102778

Been away a few days, but wanted to drop this off that goes with the graphics in this post >>2102778 that were originally posted at 1:28 AM on 7/10 in the general bread (see below).

Originally posted this >>2102770 QClock News unlocks MAP @ 1:28 AM EST

Original POTUS tweet 7/8 @ 5:58 PM EST

RT Today 7/10 @ 6:38 AM EST

6:38-5:58=1:20. 8, similar #'s/pattern all end on 8. 1:28, 5:58, 6:38

"They just didn't get it, but they do now!"

Is this is a confirmation? Coincidence? Then there is this, "Research General #2653: I Believe In The You That Believe In Me Edition!" I recall mentioning something about, I didn't think many believed or liked the theory.

I know QPosts are in military time, but twitter, the venue used, does not post in military time.

BBL to catch up on bread.

>>2134025

The very next POTUS tweet after, "They just didn't get it, but they do now!" was, "New Poll." NP as in the QPost data mine NP +1 +5. POTUS hit gold! This is just some of it, wow, jackpot!

Mostly coming here to lurk.

But I noticed how hard it's become to find you on Catalog!

At first glance Clockwork Qrange #2 is there alright,

but then page refreshes and only #1 remains to be seen down at the bottom.

(All this while the RPost#4 kindergarten is up front.)

You anons must be right over target!

So, keep up the great work and

ThanQ for the awsome job you're doing here,

even though seemingly unnoticed.

Bless you, Qlock Anons!!!

>>2118676

Q showed us how(it wasn't dark, find the markers, , spiders/'s, yes Q put the dates 12/7[as mentioned start date]-12/17 then POTUS tweeted famoud LOUD&CLEAR tweet that fell on the [11]) to map the dark/shutdown… in the 12/18 post, build the map find the 's in another post points to the 12/18 post with the /\'s see the spiders ? see graphic for [10]. the other the other darks were 9 & 11 dark days & min 13 that are (Learn History, Q) the crossing of the Delaware & battles at Lex…

>>2118676

>>2139907

Forgot to include graphic that breaks up the clock in 1of22/5:5/2Qchapters…

>>2139758

We are in a link at the top of each bread if you have trouble navigating to here.

>>2139623

This is very interesting! Is this something? Most shared timestamps that when you +1 +5 have 4 total(16), but this one in the graphic has 6(24).

>>2140561

Yes it is something. There will be patterns in our answers by the nature of the puzzle.

Just my not so humble opinion.

If anyone ever catches this lazy faggot clock Anon in a current bread remind him to put his own files here.

I am not his fucking secretary.

SpreadsheetAnon.

I think this is in error. The timestamp is from the original Anon posts, not Q. Been busy with family. Trying to do a seconds clock for posting.

Here is tomorrow's seconds markers clock (the start of the posts at :39 in order of date). Didn't find anything but laid it out so will post it anyway.

Tomorrow is interesting because there is only one Q post previously at the :39 marker. The only other location on the clock with only one post is 5:5 or the :25 day marker.

Maybe is nothing, maybe brings Q back for a busy day, maybe it is for ops and lots happens. POTUS is overseas. Not sure if any other trips planned but Q said this drops while POTUS is safe on AF1.

Haven't seen any great connections yet for tomorrow.

Clockfag Update

Re-read qrumbs.

Today's Q Clock

Pic 1

Tomorrow's Q Clock

Pic 2

You have more than you know.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

TOGETHER.

WWG1WGA!

BLANK QLOCK

Pic 3 - Clockfagging 101: Check out posts for yourselves.

Use qanon.pub and line 'em up! Locate the date you wish to inspect

and line up everything at the same minute on the clock.

SUN, 15 JUL 2018 CLOCK

>>2147272

Thanks for the graphics Anon.

Here are the posts from the mirror marker. Anyone else remember what the other significant event (besides first sub attack) from Sept 7, 1776?

>>2147611

I recognized you in the bread, Anon. There were no other significant events, to my knowledge.

Still in testing phase, here is the full graphic attached, BIG. News will bring more unlocking.

>>2092014

There are the 4 shared timestamps and the NP +1 +5 as in the graphic, haven't had a chance to see it this way with a last word cipher. Seems tricky on what the order may be, have some ideas, but need to test if they are even a possibility.

>>2145527

Things did come together this way.

>>2116715

When the 4 shared timestamps are on the clock face it is up is down, left is right, mirror, so it does look like it is going both ways. The graphic here(from time travelers guide too)

>>2139923 you can see that the clock goes down frontwards, up backwards in a sense, it is lined up with the 4 shared timestamps.

This is not mine.

AIAYFS

>>2154362

=Updated Graphic from DFAnon==

>>2145614

5:5 anon

I dont know wtf I am doing but will post clockwork here from now on!

Still playing catch up,

>>2118676

Yes, then Q should re-appear after the 10 days. On the "word code" it is the last word of the Q post, some posts don't have any words or graphics, if understanding correctly what Q has said no to graphics & keywords in stringers, if not preceding word. Did look at last line, one thing noticing in posts it seemed to be pointing to the last word. Interesting thought on the "second markers), and another way to extract certain lines, depending on the minute markers of the post & the marker each calendar day has on the Q-Clock." Would love to see what that looks like.

>>2104230

I barely scratched the surface on what was going on there, do you know if anything came of it or if it was abandoned and if so, if ever tested all the way through. The reason I as is because we all have thought of different ciphers to use by different Q clues. ROT, brute force, p=c (something like that), m = 13, 1,2,3 a,b,c, Wheel, (can't think of anymore of hand, please jump in other anons)

Now this list, I'm not sure if these are cipher clues as multiple meanings.

We all know 5:5 (5 by 5) Q has said also 1 to 1 (& another ref to this)

We all know the importance of JFK.

During WWII as many know JFK sent a message via the Playfair cipher which is a 5 by 5 cipher, 5 rows of 5

K E Y A B

C D F G H

I L M N O

P Q R S T

U V W X Z

or

D O I T Q

A B C E F

G H K L M

N P R S U

V W X Y Z

Omit J or X from alphabet to get 25

I didn't get anything from the playfair cipher, doesn't mean it's not the answer. On the ROT-13 used with numbers as the ROT-18 when combining with simple Gematria did get some interesting results, but it became confusing after a while how to apply rules for consistency. Looking at cipher machines/enigma ciphers like that there is a reflection wheel, but no progress so far turning timestamps into letters.

But, Q also said Learn Russian. There is a Russian handwritten cipher that is similar to the playfair but instead of a 5by5 it uses a method called a Straddling Checkerboard, yes checkerboard/chessboard, in creating the key that then combines not simple gematria but number values and when you change the letter into number values you then further encrypt by adding a set of 4 numbers across the message. It could be very promising if the answer can be found in Q posts on which order to list the key/alpha. Called the Vic cipher

ESTONIA-R (there is an actual post with ESTONIA in it could this be why?) common letters, this is mixed up in the first line similar to playfair, remaining letters filled in next to rows. 30 spaces total, the 1st line with ESTONIA-R & 2 blank spaces

the second line with alpha filled in with letters not used in alphabet-ESTONIA-R.

3rd line there will be two blank spaces filled in with / & * identical to the blank spaces from first row.

numbers come in to assign like a coordinate on a Map. How to mix up ESTONIA-R, kicker another keyword could be used instead of common letters. I chose backwards for mirror. putting a space where the - goes and one before & is spell "rain" as in make it rain. The numbers that go on the side are where there are blank spaces on the row.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

R A I N O T S E

1 B C D F G H J K L M

9 P / Q U V W X Y Z *

message: WRWY = W=95 R=0 W=95 Y=97

message: 95 0 95 97 the and a 4 digit number key across repeating until finished. Picked +1+5, you can guess why. Anything that = a double digit number omit the tens place so 10 would be 0 & 59 would be 9.

message: 9 5 0 9 5 9 7

nubkey: 1 5 1 5 1 5 1

add 0 0 1 4 6 4 8

Now the message is 0014648

to decipher reverse the process,remember double digits, subtract key 1515 across back to 9509597, nothing in 9 but a blank space so 95=w 0=r 95=w 97=y

the 4 digit key made me think of [min] & seconds of timestamps 11:11 using our key above only base on reflection/mirror & +1+5

1111

-1515

=0606

=RTRT

RT:RT as in retweet?

>>2155877

Forgot to mentions another "kicker" the two characters / * or any other characters don't have to go in the same places as the blank spaces in the 1st key line.

> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

> R A I N O T S E

>1 B C D F G H J K L M

>9 P / Q U V W X Y Z *

>>2149736

Another possible confirmation

original tweet 7/12 11:10, posted graphics from this in general bread 7/13 4:11, RT 7/14 5:16.

See it in all three timestamps. See it in post & RT timestamps.

:10 +1 :11 +5 :16

4:11 5:16, +01:05+

Looks like it was there in Consequential the whole time!

The consequential auth from the Q posts,

1st set was 1min interval, 2nd set was 5.

>>2155576

Thanks Anon. You are doing just fine.

We are searching for connections between the posts. You have them laid out nicely. I'm not sure I always agree with your "calculations" but the obvious ones are well, obvious.

25 or 5:5 shows up enough that is pretty clearly a KEK. I am lax in combining Trump tweets into the graphics which you have done nicely.

Seconds matter.

Wind the clock, Anon. Well done. Have a redhead.

>>2155877

Sadly had put down all clockwork & active participation in recent days, as I was (and still am a bit) irritated by DJT's comments re russia (and nato, see e.g. >>2118676 ).

Am silly enough to assume that "fair deals"/trade goes for all countries, also those that had changed (in/after the 90s), and those that managed to keep the cabal at bay and out of their borders for large parts. Have had heard enough of "muh russia" from the dems, and didn't expect it from DJT. Would indeed have a problem supporting/contributing to anything like a new arms race or a revival of the cold war, and know enough about what had been done by previous administrations to antagonize & falsely accuse Russia, while e.g. the Saudis still are allowed to make billions & billions w/o achieving much of value to the world, and even still having slaves.

Decided to take it up again, for now -- but would have to watch carefully where it all goes ....

As for >>2104230 , there was a post in the previous bread where someone posted a clock with letters and some markings -- I simply tried to understand what had been done in the post's graphic >>1743220 , but never got a response, so I assume it was just a random example.

>>2156265

adding one more with James 1:5 +1 +5

James 1:5 If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you.

>>2156323

Missed that part, I see it now "rant" Ah, don't take the comments to be about the German people or the country as a whole, but about those in power that all for a buck would do unspeakable things like the establishment here. And he's messing with them, trolling is fun, they are sooo scared of the boogie man Russia that they do business with them & not just any business important business, meaning they aren't the enemy the corrupt & failed establishment of the countries are the enemy. We the people, we the people of the world are being freed, celebrate! WWG1WGA!!! :)

>>2156265

Can see it in the chain

11:10 --04:11 --> 05:16

Checked the 04:11 post >>2139558 , and compared to my tweets archive:

Got the "NewPoll" before "they do now" (found "they do now" to be a RT from 07/08 05:58, before your intial post >>2102770 ), but that's of little relevance I guess.

Did you do +5:+1 (i.e. 11:10 --16:11 is 04:11) as a reply code (the reverse of +1:+5) on purpose, or was it just the next available time?

Just a different version. I didn't realize today was Bastille Day.

>>2155576

Anon you may want to consider cropping these down somehow. Not everyone is on a big screen monitor. Hard to view on a laptop. Almost impossible on a mobile device.

>>2155877

Anon I am not a big cypher fag (that stuff gives me a headache). I believe there is a simpler solution we are over looking. Where the posts answer one another based on the deltas and a pattern on the clock face. We are supposed to be explaining this to normies. Not saying there isn't some more complicated coding embedded into the plan, just that we need to simplify it.

What is more effective to awaken the population, some complicated coding system that only a small % of the population will ever understand or a visually easy to follow side by side posts with connecting lines?

>>2157887

2:28 EST = >>2102770

5:58 EST = original they do now

7:38 EST = RT they do now

(Trump twitter archive not in EST it seems, fixed times was off by one on both tta & post)

All end in 8

7 38, 5 58 difference of 2 & 20

ends in 8, 2 & 20, posted 2:28

On the New Poll/NP +1 +5

Correct! Is 1st then the next post is they do now, which appears to have waited to tweet for timestamp purposes?

They do now rt for confirmation on 4 shared timestamps for graphics that are also on this bread w/o having to leave this page would be identical to >>2102778

Then days later posted applied NP +1 +5 to shared timestamps,

posted 4:11 EST

RT 5:16 EST

diff of 1 & 5, one way of seeing it.

The other way is,

orig tweet 11:10EST

post 4:11EST

RT 5:16EST

just looking at :min, :10+1=:11+5=:16

>>2158548

No kidding, me too.

I lean towards the cipher being in the timestamps 4 shared with +1 +5

&

with a possible last word cipher in the 4 shared timestamps & maybe even with the +1 +5 too (not tested yet)

Is there another possible layer with a different type of cipher for Letters like the post I responded to that had a link & clock graphic with letters on the clock face? Don't know.

>>2158630

Thanks. trumptwitterarchive is GMT indeed, and I have never checked if all of their timestamps are correct. One more thing: James 1:5 +1+5 – had no such intention, and never found anyone capable of dealing w/ both, latex & scripting. Same with the wordlists, I kept all necessary clock files as a measure to avoid fuckery & faking by whoever not, also as proof that it's me when posting, as I have dynamic IP that at times I cannot control. You think it'd be better to add them to the archive above in case I stumble and say, break my neck? lol.

Other than that, I'll look at all the other stuff from above continuing with the linenumbers in the Q posts and all the images/proofs that were posted in the meantime.

Anons,

Here is the :40 second marker clock (the first posts that share the seconds time stamp of :40) which corresponds to 07/15.

Another Anon will have to finish it. Oldfag is tired and going to bed.

Wind the clock Anons.

>>2160013

Nice work Oldclockfag.

[:40] has some interesting connections with @Jack, Soros, Roths and RED X all getting 2 mentions.

R

RED

D

I'll try and expand further.

Q Clock for 16 JUL 2018

>>2161883

Thanks Anon, very nicely done.

We need a 10 minute Delta in our Trump tweets today to confirm.

DeltaForceAnon here!

Trump ReTweets a series of tweets with interesting timestamps pic related

>>2163177

Delta 7 between the groups. Did you check into this (anything interesting at the markers :07 away)? Not sure if missed anything else. Did any of the others times/dates match?

Saw the 1 in 5 reference again. Seems to relate to yesterday's discussion.

>>2163177

The tweets in the pic, they are in EDT?

>>2164932

All Eastern Standard Time

NOTABLE for me: Todays RT's are EST(-1) on the archive. Not sure whats going on there, but I assume EST unless noted, and I only use EST in my calculations, 24HR Mil time sometimes. depending on the situation. Here is what I have done so far. Check out the Qposts from [40] and [10] and all RT TW and Administration TW

>>2165060

Thanks. For whatever reason, I seem to have a problem: I see all of them (also >>2158630 ) in EDT. Will need to find more sources, also going further back in time … cross-checking.

Apologies, EDT is the times I use, I get confused by the TZ designation between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Daylight Time.

>>2165111

>>2165060

Here's a comparison b/w Twatter times (which are Pacific for me) and what I got from trumptwitterarchive.

>>2165538

Alright then … so all times are off one hour. Thanks for confirming.

What if :25 makes the mirror? We're not looking at a diametrically opposite mirror in this case, although today's clock is at 90 degrees, making the mirror diametrically opposite. Attached is the possible mirror, today's clock, and its mirror.

>>2165714

So, tomorrow's mirror would look like this.

>>2165868

Anon

Not sure I see why the hands are mirrored from 5:5

Was thinking delta of 7 from :40 and its mirror of :10

Explain your rationale please.

>>2165968

Never mind

I get it now

Thanks for doing the posts opposite.

You really show off your photoshopping skills with these graphics. Proud of you.

Mobile device fagging.

New Id for oldfag.

Coincidence?

Drudge 2 60s

1958

Today 60 years ago,

"5,000 United States Marines land in the capital"

>>2166005

Glad you get it, anon. I'm also glad you appreciate the graphics.

If it's not abundantly clear to everyone else, I'm personally forming the mirror at :25 (or 5:5, or 5:25) because that was a significant part of the clock that Q deliberately left blank up until last month. It was a marker, of sorts.

The mirror of today >>2165714 Has RUSSIA front and center. It also has Kevin Poulsen (note Q's misspelling as Paulson and his connection with SecureDrop), who was just in the news:

https://taskandpurpose.com/hackers-stole-a-reaper-drone-manual-from-an-air-force-captain-and-tried-to-sell-it-for-150/

>>2166005

>>2166488

guise, check this out.

I think Trump was trying to help clear up the delta issue for me this morning. I am having a difficult time accepting that the laser pointer is not being used to help us directly, and by us I mean clockfags. My clockwork is barley intelligible but I see patterns every day in the timestamps. Its all about the timestamps, thats how the map connects.

Please look at this and help me figure this out

>>2167084

I think we can strike the numbers 49, 31 because the RT show us that 40-33=7

so 40+/-7= 47,33

so applying the 9 delta to 10

yields 1,19

40 and 15 = 55

i think the 15 or 01 & 05 is just a double meaning of 1-in/of 5 highlighted for effect.

23,14 only to establish the other delta

anytime you see a post with 55 in it this is significant, not just for today

i am now going to highlight all the Q posts on [40] and [10] days with markers for

47, 33, 19, 01 and see what comes out, then I will go from there

>>2166488

Appreciate it too, as I always have, and anybody else around here (even w/o saying expressly) ;)

Still thinking about the mirror axis though, as it would (more or less completely) do away with the theory of shared markers as found & pictured above by "master clockfag" (not saying his approach must be right, but he was the one pointing out the clock started 12/07 back then, if I got that correct).

It's probably something we gotta keep an eye on to find solid proofs/indications for ….

Two more clocks

17 & 18 JUL 2018

I especially like the 2nd one for "The Shot Heard Round the World" painting by Domenick D'Andrea. Including the original for your collection.

>>2163177

8:40:55 clear? clear

8:40:23 t2

8:33:15 5 of 5 with :15 marker

8:33:15 4 of 5 with :15 marker

8:33:15 3 of 5 with :15 marker

8:33:15 2 of 5 with :15 marker

8:33:15 1 of 5 with :15 marker "1-in-5"

8:33:14 t1

delta = t2-t1

delta = 07:09

tentative target values are 47 33 19 01