>>9980450

>some fkeries going on with the main bread and or cat + Index? Seemed to stop about

Been having great difficulty with the board. Began with my previous post which I ended up double-posting. Then error messages for most all threads in the catalog. Noticed the dates on threads all went to Jan. 20, 2020. Thought it might be my broweser so cleared browser history among other things. i may show as a new poster again.

Some other interdasting coincidences are that live Thames cam at Marriott has been offline for 2 weeks after we were using it to get a sense of tide appearances near TATTS. And just today, a message from Ytube, when I went to play a fav inspiring music vid for this dig, am told the uploader has removed his channel. Starting to think people are worried about my viewing habits.

>>9980868

From the dates being used, (a problem these days with everyone using their own way of writing dates), that first video would make sense that she arrived at (Hull or Grimsby?) on January 22, 2015. Repairs were completed around first week in April that year.

>>9982534

Someone came asking a question about her refurb dates. As re the 75-hour time, StellariumFag is doing a more meticulous look at a 15-hour time within each if those five months between OCT13 and FEB14 and I don’t want to disturb him. StellariumFag, if you’re lurkin, take your time and Thanks.

>>9982547

It is a good dig. The 2015 New Year photo is solid. The 2015 New Year pic comports with everything we have been saying here. As I recall, in anons’ discussions at the time, they also mentioned the TATTERSHALL CASTLE funnel paint change in discussions at the time but were confused about why the pics did not agree with 2015/2016.

>>9982547

Anons, it might be a good time for a short review of general anon agreement on the umbilical between the LisaMI6/NSATrafficCams and the Corinthia Hotel pics. Let’s have this out now because if the Lisa/Traffic Cam pics vs the Cirinthia pics are not connected as a sequence of pictures taken on the same night then that fatal traffic accident on Northumberland only bookends the Corinthia Hotel pics.

Does anyone here have doubts about that connection? Because the fatal motorcycle accident on March 5, 2014 that caused London to change the signs there is the entire reason why we have placed a bookend, the latest possible date the Q pics could have been taken there, in our attempts to determine the date of the Embankment series as a whole.

>>9982617

She most definitely is a floating vessel. In the movie about her latest move, you can see her rise and fall as the workers must be very careful as they cut away her steel attachments to her mooring dolphins. It is actually an I-beam the ship is locked onto, riding up and down with the water. The RS HISPANIOLA also has an I-beam it is connected to. Here is a picture of the TATTS’s connection to the mooring.

>>9985693

>How long was Bath house Barry using brit clowns to do his spying ?

The day after he was re-elected as President. They knew they had to start putting in the fix to get the Witch in next. They could “help each other”. The Kenyan could use his State Department to get dirt on the Witch’s potential opponents. They had already gathered a short list of persons considering a Presidential run from “chatter” they had gathered during Barry’s first term.

But getting back to tying the Embankment pics together. Yes, this is kind of a review but we need it at this point. If we do tie them together, then the entire series happened before March 5, 2014.

First, LisaMI6 —NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON_2847. Okay, I was not confident that those cars parked along Victoria Embankment were the same, to link the 2 Q pics. So, I looked at how I could link them by looking at window light patterns on buildings. You know, if you ever stared at downtown skyscrapers, the lights don’t change that quickly. There are nightshift janitors working entire floors every evening. So, when I was looking at the MILLBANK BUILDING from the LisaMI6 pic, I found that the building in the darkness next to BIG BEN could be brought out with some adding light and reducing shadows.

I think it is enough for a match.

First pic- Bldg ftom LISAMI6

2nd pic- Bldg from NSA ROT1

3rd pic -Bldg from LONDON 2847

Who wants to take it from there? Was it also possible to link LisaMI 6 to NSA Traf cams using the cars?

>>9989117

>Are we saying that all these pics were from same cam ?

No. Just trying to confirm they were taken on the same night. With diff cameras and perspectives.

>>9989117

>Pics have been "renamed"

>Expand the hive mind thinking

Sorry, just trying to use some shorthand in discussing then. Typing out, “NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON_2847” gets really cumbersome at times. So, we sometimes refer to it as either LONDON or 2487. Same for ROT1, ROT2, etc.

LisaMI6.png might just be called “Lisa”.

Btw (to everyone), since we are having it out on these pics, I have only been able to discern that “Lisa” was taken the same evening. As it stands now, I am do not see anyone in the Lisa pic. Can any anon point out a woman who might appear later in the group? A car at the curb that also appears in LONDON2847? Were people being dropped off at the curb maybe?(I mean if it is a car that ties LISA and LONDON together then we should ask the obvious questions.

>>9993082

Thanks, Anon.

Do we think anyone has come from either of the two restaurant ships? Or have they just appeared in front of the two entrances? The car with brake lights dropping off passengers maybe? Good place to drop off passengers if not wanting to wait the right-turn light. The gangplank gate to the TATTS appears closed. Have seen pics of it with gate(s) open during operating hours. Who is dropping off passengers there? Perhaps employees getting a lift home after closing?

But if that were the case, then why would our 6 high-value people have loitered around the front of the closed restaurants so long? So, if restaurants are closed, then it is possible a couple of the cars might be employee cars? Just some obs.

Don’t usually post esoteric connections. Usually stick to what I can see in the pics. But as some drop their thoughts, just once I’ll post this. It goes back to that Q diagram of F_I and reporter contacts, treason and how it reminds us of WinterWonderland. It may be subliminal but have found that the wheels shown have 6, 16 and eleven points. 6-16-11? As they might relate to treason. The six-pointed wheel can easily be imagined. The 16-point wheel can be associated with a lotus or a chrysanthemum. What Asian country might we associate these flowers with.

The 11-point star or shape can be associated with an Islamic country and tile-work found there.

Found an article on a website that scientifically corroborates where a Waning Gibbous Moon should occur in the night sky. According to this article, one should expect a Waning Gibbous Moon to be seen to the SOUTHEAST around MIDNIGHT. (see diagram) In the same diagram, it says you would expect a waning gibbous Moon to be in the SOUTHWEST around SUNRISE.

While this does not nail down a date for our Q pic showing London Eye with what we suspect is the MOON in Waning Gibbous phase, it is definitely further circumstantial evidence that we actually ARE looking at the Moon in a Waning Gibbous phase, at exactly where science tells us we should expect to see it around Midnight in the night sky.

https://www.astronomynotes.com/nakedeye/s13.htm

For StellariumFag

No response necessary but just wanted to advise you that: 1) my estimate on a bearing might be flexible due to fact that on 3D mode am able show bearing to Moon about SE. Also, it may be the angle lense, but as we discussed, trying to be absolutely exact when comparing one view to another will be imperfect.(ie Q pic to GoogMap, Q pic to Stellarium and vice versa.

But, working with just a Moonrise/Moonset program have been able to find some low altitudes around Midnight on some dates.

About tide times: It looks like we are lucky to get a peak high tide around 2:30. Most are later. As you may have observed, high tides can vary from 5.50 meters to 7.70 meters. Although, the HISPANIOLA is at a high tide, the tide shown may not be 7.70 meters. You can see, our times for our tide peaks can be between 2:45am and 4:00am.

The LisaMI6.png and ROT1(w/London Eye) more than likely depict a tide still rising. it seems like all those tides with a lunar match are on early morning tide times. As regards altifude/moonrise time and bearing, I have been able to find some altitudes in the 30s and below and some late rises and Moons that stay low. But don’t worry about a Rising tide that could go higher Prolly should have said all this earlier. Questions? I have gathered times/bearings/moon rise and set dates for 4 dates in each target month if you want to ask anything. My program is a simple one.

https://www.timeanddate.com/moon/uk/london?month=11&year=2013

Am able to find a few SSE and a lot of SE Moons around midnite with it.

Sorry currently computer a No-go. GF computer not working and needs to take it to store for service.

This message just to clarify parameters of search, I hope. Didn’t want to disturb you but felt it more important to speak out now, while you are still looking at the dates.

>>10009865

A Fiction piece. Reason for posting it here?

Some free advice- leave a short description for every video you post. Will get more views if you tell people why it’s of interest.

>>10023458

All gud, StellariumFag. Thanks for working on it. Been taking care of a few IRL things myself.

>>10024965

>In sum: the roof repair coverings appeared in summer 2013, were modified by SEP 2013, remained through winter to MAR 2014.

Tyvm, Anon. Have been documenting moonrise times/bearings/altitudes in hopes of sharing with StellariumFag. Won’t venture to post sky captures. Will only say that the Moon in Q’s pic, and in that particular phase is exactly where one should expect to find it during that time of year. Previous favs last look were October and January. But, as you may recall, they put up those Christmas party banners around mid-October, by historic pictorial evidence. So, imho, favoring Jamuary 2014, and just looking at some favorable rises, bearings and times for February 2014.

May just post, as is, for StellariumFag. It may have worked out best that he has not been looking into it just yet.

>>10026630

When one thinks on motorcycle traffic, there are three types, but more likely two, to consider. The average motorcycle rider is more likely a working-class fellow using an economical means, and maybe just the means they can afford. The other motorcyclist is maybe also that working-class commuter, but one who has taken to using his cycle as a delivery/messenger service for businesses and restaurants. Another possibility are restaurant/business-owned motorcycles. Generally speaking, motorcycles will be used by working folk during normal business hours for either commute to/from their job, or to deliver parts to businesses, or to deliver restaurant food to customers. The third type would be recreational motorcycle owners. Usually done on weekends(by working folk). But say a fellow wanted to get out with the wife and kids. Can’t take the motorbike. Need the car. And if no car, then it’s public transportation. Basically, take notice where you live. Most motorcycle traffic is during business hours. Our Q pic? After workaday folks have gone home and past delivery times. Same observation for lorries on the road. It’s late in the Q NSA traffic cam pics.

>>10029793

Sorry, Anon. Have been just researching the Moon’s positions. Please do not apologize for any lack of knowledge here. Especially on this dig. We are ALL getting an education on the Moon’s phases. Your obs re a WAXING crescent sound right.

Our Q moon, a WANING GIBBOUS, is not a full moon but rather a couple of days after a full moon. It appears in the Eastern sky and is usually expected in the area of Q’s pic to be exactly where we find it- in the SE to SSE before midnite. We are looking at the fact that it is still quite low on the horizon. So, maybe recently risen? Maybe a couple of hours old but on a low trajectory?

We are running thru data on 5 suspected months during the Winter 2013/2014. We appreciate new “eyes on” Anon. Welcome to our digg. Don’t be afraid to chime in. See something, say something.

Here is the science: (see pic related)

>>10028872

Getting closer, Anon. Good work. More corroboration of the Winter 2013/2014 timeframe. Perhaps the best.

>>10029866

My thought was only regarding the lack of bicycle, motorcycle and lorry traffic indicating the late hour. But tell me, is this maybe a bicyclist? Cant see a bike seat. But looks like 2 wheels maybe.

>>10031738

Good job, Anon.

>>10023458

FOR STELLARIUMFAG, Revised Best Search Dates

StellariumFag, Have gone thru dates using matches for a Waning Gibbous Moon at MIDNITE looking for best bearing and altitude for any given night. Here is a short target list of best matches within each of the target months: Bearing given in degrees with direction AT MIDNITE, Alt=Altitude in degrees.

10/21/13, SE 129, Alt 45(at midnite)

11/21/13, SE 125, Alt 46(at midnite)

12/20/13, SE 125, Alt 39(at midnite)

1/19/14, SE 138, Alt 38(at midnite)

1/20/14, SE 129, Alt 32(at midnite)

2/18/14, SE 141, Alt 27(at midnte)

GOOD HUNTING!

>>10034507

StellariumFag, Just a thought.

Instead of searching during different high tide times for each date, and to obtain a visual comparison, lets try searching all the dates at 11:00pm. Then we might try moving the time forward or backward, but looking at them all for any given time. Good Hunting, Anon.

>>10037374

Thank you, Anon. Makes me wish we had more moving part Q pics with London Eye in them. But alas, our time frame is long. To give an idea, the Winter night in question was probably about 15.5 hrs vs. an 8.5hr Winter day. Have been using January 20 as an example. Learned quite a bit more today.

Took a free practicum on where you can expect to find the sun position, moon position or general time of day/night based on the fact that if you know 2 of the the above, you can figure the third. Some lunar phases generally occur in daylight, some occur mostly at night. Hard to explain but based on angle of the sun to the Moon.

Based on what we are seeing in the Q pic, it is definitely taken in the “earlly” part of a long, 15-hour Winter evening. would probably take until 2:45am or so just to reach the “Meridian”, using one of January target dates. The Meridian is a point straight ahead, or due South.

Again, hard to explain, but picture a circle in front of you. At the back of the circle is North(0 degrees). Now, going clockwise, you have on your left, East(90 degrees), South at 180 degrees and West at 270 degrees. (Again, just an example but my favorite date.) The Moon rise occurred 9:26pm at 90 degrees. Our pic is somewhere around SE to SSE. A free online site puts the Moon at 129 degrees SE at midnight. This would give the moon some time to get to SE from rising from due East at 9:26pm. I also like the Jan. and Feb. dates because of the later moonrises which keeps them low in the sky around or after the restaurant ships close. Will post my practicum results. Caveat: They set a standard 6am/6pm sunrise and sunset to help the beginner get the concept.

But it does involve some very interesting rules about how the sun and moon relate.

Will post phase chart which shows that a moon phase will either follow or precede the moon by a certain number of degrees(Remember the circle with degrees.) 1 of 2 (more diagrams to follow)

>>10040512

Part 2 of 2

>>10031727

>>10031738

NOTABLE

Anon Identifies public “Boris Bike” in ROT1, helping to date all the London Embankment pics prior to Aoril 2015.

>>10041318

>Does this accord with your current estimations as per positoin of moon in sky relative to sight through The Eye?

It sure does. Thank you for posting that still shot. It helps to corroborate everything we have been looking at, from relative size (appearance of the moon to relative position of the moon rising in the Eastern sky behind London Eye. Very nice. I didn’t appreciate that shot in video like I do in still pic.

>>10041318

>Have you looked at 2.16.18 to test out some of the more apt dates discoverd so far? Future proves past…? This is what prompted me to begin a broad search in news photos as per news unlocks past.

Hmmmmm. Although 2/16/18 is a Waxing crescent(almost new moon), it shows our friend NGC2847. Same for 2/16/14. 2014 is technically Waning Gibbous but still almost a full moon. But that 2847. Conf. bias?

>>10042152

>The sky looks clear. No sign of rain.

Imho, it appeared the moon was showing thru some VERY thin veil of cloud to me.

As for the specific degree of Waning Gibbous within that category, some sites show the percentage of light reflected as an aide. In the recommended search dates submitted to StellariumFag, the best match for a Waning Gibbous was given, with the assumption that StellariumFag would bracket that date looking before and after.

As to the appearance of the Moon in ROT1, yes, it is a little bit blurry, yet in its favor, has enough waning property to overcome the blur. I found that significant and factored that in. Imho it can vary roughly from 78 to 88 percent illumination. (see samples)

Try that site and walk the date forward and back, even move the time, and you get a feel for different illumination percentages in your head.

https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/moon/location.html

In the Fifth Century, the Japanese discovered the Chrysanthemum from the Chinese and were so impressed by it, the Emperor made it his symbol. But it def came from China.

>>10042385

>Imho, it appeared the moon was showing thru some VERY thin veil of cloud to me.

Was trying to think of word on the tip of my tongue to describe the thin layer of moisture obscuring the Moon. DIAPHANOUS. Trying to keep a decent vocabulary.

>>10042152

Think my studies in Lunar Science may be paying off. Using the method of assigning moonrise to a position of West(90 degrees) on a circle, along with site providing the time the Moon passes the Meridian(due South-180 degrees). We are also in possession of historic data as to what compass bearing the Moon was at midnite on any given night.

For an example using January 20, 2014, am going to use my original obs that NSA TRAF CAM ROT1 shows the Moon at a bearing of SSE from Hungerford Bridge looking thru London Eye.

Using the circular diagram mentioned above, place Moonrise at 9:26pm at the 90 degree, West position. We are told that it took until 2:53am for the Moon to reach the Meridian(due South, 180 degrees). We now have a time frame for the time it took for the moon to travel 90 degrees. At midnite, we are told, the moon was at 129 degrees- almost SE(which is 135 degrees). So, to get the time for when the Moon was at the observed SSE position, we divide the minutes between its midnite time(very close to SE and the time at the Meridian(due South) at 2:53am. This tells us the Moon would be at bearing SSE around 1:17am.

(The above calculation bases on 1/20/14 data from open source data).

>>10056538

>She certainly didn't talk to me. What is a "Population Correspondent" anyway?

Answer: Ministry of Truth Public Information Officer attached to the BBC.

Posting this ahead of future discussions about why Q pic ROT1 depicts roughly (at this time) late evening between midnight to 1am-ish.

An understanding that each moon phase represents a definite time relation to the sun is important going forward.

For example:

Waxing crescent- always follows sun by 45 degrees.

Waning crescent- always leads the sun by 45 degrees.

First qtr moon (you see left 1/2 dark, rt side is lit) always 90 degrees behind the sun.

Third qtr moon(you see left 1/2 lit, rt side dark) always leads the sun by 90 degrees

Full moon- always 180 opposite Moon

New moon- always 0 degrees (near the sun)

Waxing Gibbous- always follows sun by 135 degrees.

Waning Gibbous- always leads the sun by 135 degrees.

To picture 135 degrees, just think of a 90 degree angle plus a 45 degree angle.

Some things to remember: It takes the Moon roughly 3 hours to transit 45 degrees of the sky. Roughly an hour for 15 degrees.

The Waning Gibbous Moon is usually around 135 degrees in the night sky at midnight.

Picture in your mind a circle. The bottom of the circle is North and represents 0 (zero) degrees. East is on the left of tge circle at 90 degrees. SouthEast is at 135 degrees.

South is 180 degrees.

For later discussion about tides- this is why we seem to be seeing a high tide correlation in the wee hours around 3ish when the Moon reaches its peak height in the sky at due South (aka the Meridian).

This is why I have said that we are seeing a tide in LisaMI6 around 6 meters but on its way higher. A rising tide.

A while back, anon asked about Spring tides. Did not have an answer back then. Posting info with a tide graphic which may also give anons an understanding why a high tide should be be expected to coincide with the Moon at its highest (aka- at the Meridian). Open source stats are consistently putting high tides we are looking at in our target dates as occurring close to 3 hours after the SE 12am-ish position of the Waning Gibbous moon.

What we are seeing is agreement with open source data. This is good. From appearances, it is starting to look like our ROT1 pic is indeed after business hours for the restaurant ships, and either a weekday or Sunday, but not on a Friday or a Saturday.

STELLARIUMFAG, IF YOU ARE LURKING

It has been in front of us the whole time. We just needed to keep looking at it. But think about it. And it's all open source! When during the Moon's transit across the sky should we expect the highest tide? At the Meridian? We can use the high tides now, along with our best search estimate. In your comparisons, recommend a quick looksee for a high tide match at MERIDIAN.

Good hunting and Godspeed.

>>10057678

Teamwork.

o7

Can anyone get better resolution on the car in CH1? Can it be a B7 X-drive? Any car fags that can identify?

>>10061295

No worries StellariumFag. Was just letting you know about the Meridian as another point of comparison.. Comms not intended in any way to pressure you. Was just excited about realization that the tide time need not match the Q pic time as crossing meridian is a couple of hours away. I had been worried about the high tides being hours away from what we were seeing, but now am not worried, and was anxious to share. Godspeed, Anon.

>>10061300

"

Britain was a major player in the transatlantic slave trade. British ships carried 2,600,000 enslaved Africans in the 18th century to the Caribbean and the Americas. London was the leading British slaving port in the 17th century, with control over the trade until 1698. Bristol overtook London in the 1730s, and Liverpool overtook Bristol in the 1740s. These three ports are the ones commonly associated with the slave trade, but many of the smaller ports around Britain also joined in. Many of these small port towns pulled out of the transatlantic trade in slaves, sugar or tobacco leaving it to the larger ports such as Bristol and Liverpool. This was because they lacked access to the goods, cargoes, finance and experience of the larger ports. Some small port towns supported the slave trade through other means. For example, the herring fishing fleet from the town of Bridgewater in Somerset provided dried fish to the plantation slaves in the Caribbean. As elsewhere in Europe, not only port towns and cities were involved in the slave trade. Merchants from Birmingham (in the midlands) and Bath (in the south west) for example, invested in slaving voyages out of Bristol. Manufacturing towns, such as Birmingham in the midlands and Manchester in the north of England, sold products as trade goods to the slavers in the port cities. These included goods such as cotton cloth from Manchester, and guns and metal goods from Birmingham."

With acknowledgement to the work by Nigel Tattersfield on the Slave Trade from the minor ports of England.

http://www.discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/routes/places-involved/britain/

Well, Bristol and Liverpool were involved in the African Slave Trade.

>>10063019

>Is November 5, 2013 viable?

This might seem an odd response to your question because sometimes we don't know why a picture is useful to us until later. An anon who shall remain nameless posted a pic of a ship for a discussion on tide levels and ended up proving for our dig that the TATTERSHALL CASTLE kept special weekend hours on Friday and Saturday back in 2014. We hadn't been able to find that info by way of a restaurant website on TinEye but got it from an Alamy stock photo.

We are actually interested in any London pics from that Winter 2013/2014 timeframe that you think might have caught something. I went to the link you provided and they do have some interesting pics.

If you could get someone's vacay pics from a late night pop in to the lobby bar at the Corinthia Hotel during our timeframe would be great! jk, maybe.

But thanks very much, Anon. If you are new, welcome to the digg.

>>10063442

Amazing hive mind going on here! Thought I double-posted!

>>10041318

Anon, as you have posted a a pic showing a FULL MOON behind London Eye, and our ROT1 pic shows a WANING GIBBOUS MOON also behind London Eye, I want to let anons know that, although both LUNAR PHASES are seen behind London Eye, the FULL MOON depicted rose around SUNSET, and the WANING GIBBOUS MOON rose around 9pm. Very important to understand.

>>10028086

Sorry, anon. Just caught the gist of what you were saying about that tower construction shroud on Westminster Palace. Just want to confirm. Are you convinced it is the white object seen next to Big Ben? If so, then you are also saying it was not put in place until November 2013?

If you and anons are convinced that is tge case, then we have ruled out October as a possible month for the Embankment pics?

That means that we are now only analyzing the data for 4 months. It was mentioned on one site I visited, can't recall which, that the unaided human eye can detect changes in the Moon's phases within a 15-hour period.

That means we have limited our search timeframe to an approximate 60-hour timeframe for when the Embankment pics could have occurred.

>>10066617

Rule out Halloween.

>>10072542

Always think of the horizon. Each one of the separate Moon phases has its own moonrise time. Remember the 45-degree rule. Each 45 degrees represents 3 hours. EASY to tell the difference. If you are worried that people won't be able to tell the difference in the Moons visually, then you must show what the restaurants look like at night during business hours. So here is how I know the Q pic is not the full moon. The full moon always rises at sunset. At 45 degrees(add 3 hrs) it would be 9-ish. Remember business hours. Lights on?

A WANING GIBBOUS moon always rises about 9pm-ish. Add 45 degrees(3 hrs) and it should be midnight. Lights on?

>>10076058

Have observed those early sunsets and late sunrises. Short days of Winter. Going to say at this point, am not an astronomer. The days are longer, like 15+ hours. This could affect our observation. Am still looking at that. So far, only know the basics. Only know this, the Moon will orbit the Earth at a set number of hours REGARDLESS of how long the nights/days are. The Moon is a one-trick pony. It revolves around the Earth at a set speed, otherwise you would not have a 29.5 day month, every month, no matter what the season. The key is the Sun/Moon relationship. The full moon will be "opposite" the noon-day sun. There may be some adjusting. The 3-6-9-12 hour sky represents a 12-hr night and day at equinox. The astronomical websites do acknowledge this and state that they use this arrangement for teaching, with a visual image, the concept of the moon either following the sun or leading it. Am not quite fully educated (kek!) on the issue, But again, I think the key lies in the fact that, no matter how long the nights get, the Moon must complete its orbit in the same amount of time. "Sorry, Aquarius. Still working on a solution." In the meantime, consider this. We have 4 target times, based on our external and based observations of the timeframe. We KNOW this is the Winter of 2013/2014 already. Imho that is a Waning Gibbous moon. Can compare open source Full moon data from open source if one wished. But yes, the moon hangs in the night sky for over 15.5 hrs in Winter but seems to make its way to the halfway point in half the time anyway? Therefore, doing in 7.5 hours what it would do in 6 hours in the Summer? Working on that.

>>10077013

Unless you guys are backing off assertion that the white construction shroud puts a backstop on this digg at NOV. '13, then we are clearly established in Winter 2013/2914.

Imho, we can start using open source data of moonrise (90 degrees) times compared with time at Meridian(180 degrees). Divide the total transit tine in half to get time at the 135 degree (approx) position. Can compare with open source Full moon data if necessary.

>>10077416

>>10077013

Posting some hard data from open source on my fav 2 target dates- JAN and FEB so you guys can be of good cheer.

1/20: HT @3:48 of 6.91 meters; Mrise 9:26p; Midnite bearing 129 @129deg., Alt 30 deg; passing Meridian @ 2:53a; Mset @ 9:36a

Note: A good bearing/altitude; a nice high tide nearing 7 meters. Agrees with LisaMi6 tide which still appears a good meter below highest of 7.4 which could be the highest of tidegauge.

2/18: HT@3:29a of 7.36m; Mrise 9:30p; midnite bearing 141 degrees, Alt. 27; passing Meridian @ 1:36am; Moonset @ 8:31a

Note: Good midnite bearing/alt, a very high tide following the Meridian time by 1:53min.This very high tide needed more time to roll in perhaps and agrees with Lisa/MI6 level seen. See prev. posted pic of tide gauge which makes it appear that a 7.5m tide would be lapping at the base of the pedestrian wall.

Cheers, Anons

>>10079278

>18:26:57 on a 24 hour clock is 6:26:57pm. Hope that helps? Unless I misunderstand your train of thought.

>>10079378

Good eye on the rear door. Think it might be a VIP edition with bulletproof extras?

Can we see it in NSA traffic cams?

The VIP thing is intriguing. Someone in SIS?

>>10079278

Just thinking here. Why compare against 4 years later? Unless Q has left us an Easter Egg on SV for that date? Leap years occur every 4 years. Add a day? 2/17/14?

>>10080063

Try Embankment/CH/Northumberland? After all, wasn't that Q pic for that post there?

>>10080750

SECOND THAT NOTABLE

>>10081243

Very interesting. A military "sand table" of sorts kind of thinking?

>>10084179

>panic inducement

That is exactly what I think the [UK] Stay Alert Q posts were about. The warning about a car with B7,X, using a pic with none of the target pedestrians in it. No pics are wasted. One of the vehicles on the road is the subject of that London2847 pic. The same in CH 1 morning pic? There is a reason for each. Q is saying, "We have these pics of these people and a car that was driven that night."

Btw, Where do I park if I am a hotel guest? Is there underground parking or do I find my own parking on the street? Trying to reason why a car might keep going on Victoria rather than turn left onto Northumberland. A driver could not enter Whitehall(wrong way). Would have to go to Trafalgar roundsbout to go the "back way" park on Whitehall? Am think of a poss match for B7 on Victoria but it appears to be continuing on Victoria instead of turning left onto Northumberland.

>>10089862

The precise image is lost in the glare but I did find the phone won 2 awards from "Stuff" magazine. Observe the word "Stuff" again. It is the magazine's logo. See the shape of the word Stuff at the top? Now picture 2013 in red at the top. Now picture below that: Stuff

Gadget

Awards

Winner

(see pics)

>>10080448

Can Anon do an anon a favor with SV? Am looking for alternative sources for a bearing to the Moon in ROT1. Have reason to believe SV would be more high tech than looking at a tiny GoogMap compass if it does provide a compass bearing. Does SV show compass bearing? Would be looking for a lineup with right edge of that memorial in front of RS HISPANIOLA with your best approximation where Moon sits behind LONDON EYE. Thanks vm.

>>10092296

^^^^^^^*^^^^^

>Tyranny extended in UK, jiggery pokery in public accounts (can any anon understand?), Steele's sources include convicted Ukrainian drunk and a pornographer, BBC promotes Afghan poppy trade as good example of capitalism and solar power!

NOTABLE

Embedding this vid for anon above. Vid description above, by original poster.

https://youtu.be/CrG1l1PDWBM

>>10077013

> Would not the Moon be visible in relation to a fixed object at certain angles only certain times during the year?

Correct, Anon. That is the very science we are hoping to employ. We intend to use the horizon, length of night using that 180 degree horizon. The moon rise and set times provide the duration of the moon's traverse across the sky. We are comparing the Moon's angle as a fraction of the whole to determine how long it takes to get where we see it in Q's pic. For an easy EXAMPLE of this, a 12-hour night can be divided by 2 to get the Meridian (1/2 way point) at 6 hours. Half of that is 45 degrees which would b 3 hours of moon traverse. If our Moon rose at 9pm and we see it in Q's pic at a 45 degree angle, then the estimated time we are seeing it would be around 12:30am. We are going to be looking at the 12 midnite on every sample to see where the moon is. The public sites are nice enough to have published the midnite times for all dates, I think for the purposes of comparison. Some example targets from my favorite 2 months. Observe the midnight information on each.

>>10095150

Close. When you have the time perhaps-

Could you either put your crosshair focus on the point of London Eye where the Moon is next to the mast? Or perhaps the cameraman spot is to the right? Looking for two yellow lines in my edit of your pic to line up. In the Q pic the side of that Memorial is almost diirecttly lined up underneath the Moon.

Will look for date of LG G2 award.

Sorry to bug. When you have time. And Thank vm!

>>10096158

>Perhaps the time range excludes that week also?

Was hoping to see someone's calendar of confirmed eliminated dates.

ANOTHER IDEA: Perhaps in the background. When I was searching for special color-theming for London Eye, didn't have much luck on specific dates, but a comment was made that different color themes are chosen by popular vote on Twitter? (or was it Facebook?) Think there might be some record of this?

Found a Halloween event but it was 2015 and don't know when they started doing it.

What about Christmas? Other holidays, events honoring soccer teams, Cancer awareness, honoring heroes, etc.

Confirms in ted? Maybes in yellow?

>>10096277

Those are great, Anon! Been meaning to ask for that. Very important to compare other open source views. Wish they had digital compasses. But we make do. That's the fun. Thanks vm!

>>10096437

Getting a solid Southeasterly bearing with those. Thanks again. That's our 135-degree bearing we want.

>>10099947

>Relevant to the Victoria Embankment during the timeframe of Q pics? Possibly eliminates some, if not all, of DEC 2013? Or no?

Well, I would say no. A few reasons. Hull is so far away. Of the 2 high tides on 5DEC2013, one was unremarkable at 5.71 meters; the second, at 7.01, a higher end of spectrum for tides but not a record breaker.

A bread or so ago anons were looking at some flooding that had occurred(was that upriver? no matter). When we first got the London tides, keeping in mind anons' observations about Thames flooding that year, I kinda kept an eye our for unusual high tides but saw nothing that stood out. Now, London does have that really wonderful storm surge protection system though. Hull may not have such a system. (Not being the nation's capital).

But the idea of keeping a calendar of excluded dates is a good one. Btw, I thought we had established continuity between EMB and CH. So both should share biokends? No?