>Most non "Common cold" Cororavirus are not spread between Humans.
They're also one of the easiest to genetically engineer. See >>1548
<Manipulation of the coronavirus genome using targeted RNA recombination with interspecies chimeric coronaviruses.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19057874
That paper was released in 2008 btw.
>All who have said info counter to the "Narrative" are silenced
Yeah, plenty of anons and even doctors were saying months ago that ventilators were causing "Covid" patients to die. And look what happened and is still happening. Sorry but that can't be just simply equivocated away so easily by calling those deaths "inflated numbers" and "life is not fair. it sucks".
>Hope you known a Doctor to agree.
There's plenty of evidence out there already. This is a very small sample.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/08/viral-shedding-covid19-pcr-montreal-baby/
<“It’s a red herring,” said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy, said of post-recovery testing using rt-PCR, or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. “Because what it leads us to believe is something that very likely is not true, and that is that we’re still shedding infectious virus.”
https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/04/14/coronavirus-false-positives-false-negatives-and-trouble-covid-19-mass-testing-14715
<The reality of mass screening is that it's never done. Besides the impracticality, there is a scientific reason for it: Diagnostic tests are imperfect, and they produce false positives and false negatives. Even if kept to a minimum, minor inaccuracies create substantial problems. To understand why, we must consider a diagram that every epidemiology and biostatistics student has seen:
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist
<A paper from Singapore by doctors and public health officials provides a revealing look at the inner guts of coronavirus testing. Hidden away in the supplementary material of reference [24], where few people will see it, it exposes some important issues with tests
<But, in reality even individual tests are not binary, not positive or negative, but a range of numbers that are arbitrarily divided into positive on one side and negative on the other. Possibly there is a grey area that allows other factors, including the bias of the doctor or laboratory, to enter into the interpretation, or that will require further testing.
Even CNN covered it. Then the riots happened and it was quickly buried.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/26/health/antibody-tests-cdc-coronavirus-wrong/index.html
<Antibody tests used to determine if people have been infected in the past with Covid-19 might be wrong up to half the time, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in new guidance
HALF THE TIME. 50% potentially could be giving false readings. Would the narrative be effective if the current case load was cut in half?
The FBI even warned there are faulty tests floating around. How many are really out there and how many Americans are being falsely tagged and traced for life?
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-warns-of-potential-fraud-in-antibody-testing-for-covid-19
<The Federal Bureau of Investigation is warning the public about potential fraud schemes related to antibody tests for COVID-19.
<Scammers are marketing fraudulent and/or unapproved COVID-19 antibody tests, potentially providing false results. In addition, fraudsters are seeking to obtain individuals’ personal information (names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, etc.) and personal health information.
Then there's this post from yesterday (pic 3). I can't personally determine if this anecdote is true or not, but one would think that there is someone who could (and should given it's a potential life or death situation for a group of people).
>>>/qresearch/9755686
>They have pushed so hard TESTING TESTING TESTING. You cannot break this without a huge PUSH behind you.
Then what are we are for? What happened to "Be the News"?