>>2264

haha, lauhing man R, ok. Yeah I do need to make more edits, I lost a draft on pastebin that wasnt saved, my antivirus stopped it from posting.

>>2264

finished the updates. Posted to guest oped thread.

>>2268

all good, next time I'll know better

>>1702

what about gab.ai as a backup? twitter could nuke our account any day. guess I'm a little late on this.

>>2348

It's been impossible for me, all the hours I've spent arguing haven't had any effect. Some of them will realize they're wrong when big names start getting charged but Idk how we can spread the news to them, they don't wanna listen.

Somehow we need to spread news to the left, the right already knows.

>>2391

thanks for proofreading and formatting! and posting. I'll know to include the attribution, permission and endnotes next time.

>>2401

I like numbers better too, I used roman because its the libre default. Looking forward to the new site!

>>2450

>or we can make something up, or do nothing, but a lot of thought has gone into the Creative Commons approach.

I like Creative Commons BY-ND

>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/

anyone can distribute and commercially is ok, but nobody can edit.

CC BY-SA:

Gives the fake news shoot-first-ask-questions-later permissions if I understand it right.

>Adaptations must be shared under the same terms

Personally I don't want to deal with legalese.

Noncommercial:

wouldn't this stop a lot of sites from re-posting? We need to get the message out.

So I like CC BY-ND.

>>2493

can someone pls explain the notices on bottom

>>2641

John here, I wont be cucked out of putting my name on my opeds. Enormous time and effort goes into those articles and frankly I don't see my name on it being different than someone posting under a twitter handle. Excuse me if I sound confrontational.

Working on something now, trying to finish it tomorrow. Your call how you wanna do it but I'm not giving permission to remove my name or otherwise edit without clearing it with me.

>>2652

You bet.

>>2654

great, glad we're on the same page.

>>2697

I'm a late nighter, in the day time I have other things I have to focus on. If I'm up really late then I'm trying to write something.

It's slow because there's too much to research, I'm working on the Mueller hoax and trying to stay away from Seth Rich stuff. Have you heard that Guccifer 2.0's USB-speed (DNC leaks) could be because he transferred the files to usb after hacking? I get that there was no hack but this would blow up my argument.

>>2700

thanks