Awesome addition! These documents are so important and inspiring for our Patri-hearts.
Would be cool to do a side by side of some of the changes since then.
Or a map from then till now. We can call it- Our legislation matters! Choose your leaders wisely.
Worth noting: the Federalist papers were the birth place of the Federal Reserve, right? It was a good “idea” that wouldn’t play out well in reality.
Just brainstorming. Note- pre coffee so it’s [my thoughts] all kinda dusty and pixelated.
How Alexander Hamilton set the stage for the Federal Reserve as we know it today.
It wasn’t that our founding Father’s didn’t agree on some form of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist just firmly believed in the Bill of Rights and it’s supremacy over the proposed Constitution. The Federalists wanted primarily national-based power and Anti-Federalist wanted primarily state based power. "The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the Articles.” (If you’d like to understand more about the two party paradigm, a great article on it can be found here (1). Each side had legitimate arguments for where the power should rest. The central (private) bank was only one topic that arose from the discussion, however the flavor of debate over the issue was the same.
At the time, America had recently, yet not completely, severed it’s relationship with England, and many (Anti-Federalists) had concerns over establishing a central (private) ‘bank’ modeled after the Bank of England. They believed doing so, might allow America to be “purchased” with primarily private funds, many of which could be foreign. How could we possibly control the influx of money from these sources, if the bank remained a private corporation and thus not transparent in nature? A private bank can not be “audited” by anyone but itself, and thus offered no accountability to the people.
The fears of the anti-federalist would eventually become a reality. Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, and the Federalists, proposed a central bank. Their efforts proved to be successful and did, in fact, birth the first American Central Bank (2). Though that bank did see an early demise, it is the basis for the Federal Reserve as we know it today. A central bank was established with $2 million Treasury dollars and $8 million private investors, many of which were foreign (3).
1.http://factmyth.com/federalists-and-anti-federalists-explained <http://factmyth.com/federalists-and-anti-federalists-explained/>
2.https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2007/the-bank-that-hamilton-built#:~:text=The%20intellectual%20architect%20of%20the%20bank%E2%80%94known%20today%20as,profoundly%20influenced%20the%20economic%20development%20of%20this%20country
3.https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/first_bank_of_the_us
The concept of the Federal Reserve was certainly a Federalist one.
As far as being "pro-fed" now days, things are different.
By saying "PRO FED", i am referring to the distribution of power WITHIN our borders and not "PRO "FEDERAL RESERVE". The Federal Reserve (central bank) is a concept that will never work [unless completely restructured and held accountable by Americans] because the funding for it is currently backed by global money/power, just as it was when Hamilton conceived it [central bank].
The founding fathers would turn over in their graves if they witnessed the what their simple arguments would evolve into.
While small government [Anit-Fed back in hammilton's day] works in a country that is self governed (ie-no global control, the American ideal)- it DOES NOT when that "small government control" has become two sided and one of those sides is pushing a global new world order that leaves its citizens in the hands of a corrupt global oligarchy. Wither the current democratic officials who are pushing the global agenda [calling it small government- ie- Anti Federal distribution of power] are aware of just what they are promoting, remains to be seen. Each of us must awaken in God's time. Some of those Dems are just victims of a two party paradigm that has been pushed [on purpose] since the Federal Reserve was established. The MSM has become a cheap megaphone for the NWO. Pro small federal control means power to the American people, NOT power to the[few] global elites whose agenda is one of global dominance with no regard to person.
Perhaps the Federal government is necessary at this point to regain control of our beloved country. When the infighting has become a war between American independent Liberty and a satanic plan to de-populate the world, American must be restructured [traitors arrested] to take back it's armies and use them to protect itself against wars from within. This can only happen when the Commander in Chief is American [trump?] and not doing bidding for the queen [HRC].
Abolishing the Federal Reserve (Central Bank) is essential in taking back our country. We [as a country] can afford necessary military if our money is appropriated ethically and used first and foremost for our country's protection. We can not continue to be the Army for the world until we secure American soil and liberties. Once we've established a sound border [digitally, physically, politically, financially]- we will be better equip to take on satanist world wide.
JFK was shot for it, Jackson dodged bullets for it, one can only imagine the protection necessary for Potus at this point [federal protection]. We are witnessing biblical proportions in the sense that these things have been prophesied and obviously planned [Internal Bumblbees]. We have more than we know, in that we have been given a time travel document to guide us (similar to the bible, but not to be confused with). God Wins. We will not know the exact time or place, but we can watch for the signs.
Hopefully the sins of Hammilton [Federalist] will not be repeated and we can re-define Federalism to include the "only if American" clause and redistribute power accordingly.
EXACTLY!!!! The concept of a Central Bank run with GLOBAL Funds is not, and has never been a truly FEDERAL one!