>>965 According to procedure, the deletion request of this is carried out formally. However, 79 does not delete and not explain the reason which is not deleted. The person who wrote in is unknown and there is no proof of the fact. This is clear slander and will bring her disadvantageous profit. This should conflict with a deletion guideline clearly. Why doesn't 79 delete this? It is the reason that I want to know. If allowed to say honestly, 79's Japanese is more unclear than English of Jim.
>>966 I agree with the opinion of Jim. But it is not related. It is a problem that the girl is slandered.