dChan


272 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 01:51:39 ID: +3UlQA7X
削魔除=◆witch2enoc
She has the problem very much.
The user was made to shudder with the act on one's own authority.
It is necessary to take the responsibility of this confusion.
275 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 02:14:23 ID: +3UlQA7X
くそう
管理人はやっぱに本後出来る奴にしろよ
276 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 02:24:34 ID: +3UlQA7X
With the kiddie porn that the Japanese thinks about
The kiddie porn that Mr. JIM thinks about is a different thing.

And, the definition of the kiddie porn of having heard it from the police on which 削魔除=◆witch2enoc insists is also quite different from a Japanese sense.

Did she hear the story from the police in what country?
She doesn't answer the question.

She is insisting the kiddie porn on this.
>http://up7.pandoravote.net/img/kawaJK_0001611.jpg

Does Mr. JIM also think it is the same?
A lot of Japanese think her to be a liar. She is very a controversial person.


It is discussed here.
■児童ポルノ芋掘り議論■3
http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1225206733/
278 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 03:37:21 ID: +3UlQA7X
>>277
Do the problem to be say the candid shot?
However, she insisted that this was a kiddie porn.
And, the request of the access inhibit has been made.

This causes all confusion.
http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1225206733/603

First of all, it is necessary to define what the kiddie porn.
Every range of the kiddie porn on which she insists will be very too large, and be treated as a child pornography contributor.

She assumed seeing like the kiddie porn, and deleted even general pornography.

And, the request of the access inhibit has been made as a child pornography contributor.

She is insisting that this obtains the acknowledgment of Mr. JIM.
Is this true?

She is requesting the access inhibit by a very vague, and sense standard.
Does Mr. JIM understand the situation?
280 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 03:56:35 ID: +3UlQA7X
And, could you suppress the communication with mail to the minimum in 削魔除=◆witch2enoc?

Could you exchange the discussion and the opinion in public appearances?

A lot of people cannot confirm it when insisting that it exchanges only with E-mail, and 削魔除=◆witch2enoc was permitted from JIM.

It only causes the individual to drive recklessly.

Her this behavior is it exactly.
Even sentences without the problem
Contributor's sentences are insisted on that dealings of the kiddie porn are suggested, and she has made the access prohibition request.
All of the cause of the large confusion of PINK are her arbitrary decisions now.
I want you to specify the standard of the kiddie porn newly presented.

In the judgment of 削魔除=◆witch2enoc, it is judged that all the people are the child pornography contributors.

I hope for Mr. JIM to understand the situation please, and to give the wise judgment.
283 : 名無し編集部員 : 2009/05/13 (火) 04:45:59 ID: +3UlQA7X
She is declaring that this image is a kiddie porn.
And, the access prohibition request is done.
http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1225206733/603

★090422 BBSPINK 児童ポルノ案件報告スレッド
http://qb5.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/sec2chd/1240346207/167

167 名前:削魔除 ◆witch2enoc [sage] 投稿日:2009/05/10(日) 05:15:12 ID:HckjemP50
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239323744/158 2009/04/21 02:54:53 ID:jgDF6B4R0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1228390894/197 2009/04/28 22:50:17 ID:oZ4p+v5d0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1212077491/527 2009/04/30 22:50:56 ID:+KYDtwlA0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239724246/809 2009/05/05 14:49:07 ID:0utswmkv0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1212077491/577 2009/05/06 05:16:22 ID:nqb3ThzA0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239724246/843 2009/05/06 12:57:40 ID:cM5ZLxGz0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239724246/879 2009/05/07 01:37:44 ID:QS+mGzOC0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1224569186/665 2009/05/07 05:29:12 ID:qsY9uQrX0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239724246/899 2009/05/07 12:03:37 ID:QS+mGzOC0
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1239937099/246 2009/05/08 05:58:01 ID:KOfzrlgj0

Evidence exists, and it is not possible to make an excuse.