To dear Jim
Thank quickly response !!
The deletion volunteer says that he or she will not open the judgment whether correspond
to the kiddie porn to the public.
The user asked it why. He explained saying as not saying to Mr. Jim to the user.
Moreover, he says that he voluntarily goes to the police, and knows whether the act in
what kind of BBS collides with the law.
However, it explains that the standard etc. are said that it must not say from the manager.
It was an opinion that it was necessary to wait in mail.
Declaring to the user as a manager like this is significant.
What can able judgment to be it, and important showing the judgment as the manager to
the user.
So , user trusts volunteer's act. User can control volunteer's deviating act (guide 1b).
The snap in the going to school photograph of the woman student in Japan is included in
the one with a large amount of data deleted as a kiddie porn.
You approved the deletion without showing the standard of the kiddie porn.
The manager's trust so much is dangerous for the volunteer.
I am waiting for manager's statement.
Clarify the deletion standard in this BBS. Is it an act that what act indicts
to the police?
I am wishing the relieved use.
Thank you for reading.