[890]名無し編集部員<sage>
2009/11/06(金) 14:59:40 ID:TpDA+Y3V
He's appalled cuz he (looked like) dug it with no consideration
There's no doubt Jim-san following guideline he has in mind!
believe him! >ERO
*sarcasm against Jim-san*
>>891
[891]名無し編集部員<sage>
2009/11/06(金) 15:03:12 ID:yF8M+7ZJ
Jim-san dug it just because one user wanted to know whether that's a Maru-and-proxy
That's a big issue
>>892
[892]名無し編集部員<sage>
2009/11/06(金) 15:16:28 ID:cdqn3vTr
It's a repeater case. I see no problem there.
>>893
[893]名無し編集部員<sage>
2009/11/06(金) 16:16:32 ID:6Gu8pwtZ
2ch's ban operators seldom do these "WANTED" thing.
and dig it quick.
even more often if Maru look like used
anyway Boo2008 is a good tool. try when you found trolls.
although it can't auto-identify all proxy