>>217666

Right. The material has to be presented to the target audience in a way that will appeal to them. We can help re-frame the issues by using different verbiage to help bring liberals on board POTUS' programs. That's tricky but high IQ autists can do it.

>>217629

Interesting.

>>217675

>Then who would

There are people who stand to lose everything, not just their freedom is at stake. Intel from the entire world monitors here and cuckchan. There are a lot of fingers in the pie, a lot of factions and their many operators.

The question is: who would make a twitter account to sow distrust of the NSA whistleblower and patriot Thomas Drake, then retweet a lot of Wikileaks stuff, then change their name to something in a stringer that Q posted here?

Who does or would that benefit?

>>217687

That's funny. I told you to fuck off to reddit twice :)

The language and culture of /pol/ is fine here, but it's not what will actually work with the public.

There are different age groups, different backgrounds, intellectual levels, experience levels etc here. There really is no "we" because anons even on /pol/ are radically different from each other in some ways.

The way /pol/acks talk/behave is board culture. There have many who have come in here and tried to tone-police us, which will never, ever work. Ever.

But board culture isn't going to help us in our effort to educate and calm the public.

Internal culture vs reaching an out-group, alien culture

More difficult for some than others.

>>217697

A lot gets ignored, especially when da shillz r stormin'

>>217710

>for those who want it

Like anons here and elsewhere and much of the public. Q has used the Socratic method as a psychological tool to draw anons in, and anons have projected that info/posts outward to do the same. Draw people in using basic human instincts and traits like curiosity. The information is there, most just don't know where to look, or when they find things, who to trust.

>>217785

>This is a good way to dial them back and take control of their followers to switch off their cognitive dissonance.

It also provides an excellent opportunity to use our output to sway their followers. If it is done right, we can bring a lot more people onboard POTUS' program(s) and actions. These can be golden opportunities and reap a lot of rewards IF anons make output that leads instead of bashes/alienates.

>>217792

Costa Rica is a complete clown playground. It has no military. In the jungles there are a lot of heavily armed bad hombres guarding plantations and trafficking routes.

As other anons asked - who was on the plane (and why are they important)?

If Q told us that Sara Carter is getting scoops and is physically under guard/protection for a reason, this must be important…

>>217798

DISINFO. Disregard.

You might as well post Hal Turner shit on here.

>>217768

Some of this is bullshit. "helpers" again? nah

>>217851

>Wilcocks

Not a credible source, sort of like Fulford.

>>217858

> taking their money then letting some go.

Letting = not under house arrest

They aren't off the hook.

Assets they gave up go into the treasury, no longer available to pay puppets (including the terrorists they ran)

>>217860

Lacking context and depth of understanding. Roosevelt was a commie-loving idiot (and his wife). Those people had a bad plan, went about it all wrong and may not have been good people, but two world wars in less than 50 years was difficult for many.

>>217911

True but it is actually more than that.

Liberals tend to have less developed frontal cortex and more developed amigydala, hence why they "feel" more than think, and respond to emotional manipulation rather than facts/logic/evidence.

People who are conservative are the opposite.

This is why it so difficult for people from these groups to get through to each other.

This is also why it is so much easier to manipulate liberals.

This is why liberals seem so detached from objective reality.

This is why liberals live in the Fantasyland the Mockingbird media creates.

Psychological understanding and exploiting their strengths and weaknesses, instinct and general human traits (like curiosity, resentment at being screwed over) is how liberals are manipulated by the Mockingbirds in both the media and academia.

OUR job is to use those methods to bring liberals onboard.

Educate them on how they have been screwed over,

>exploit their resentment

>exploit the hopelessness

>exploit the helplessness

>exploit their deep feelings of insecurity and isolation even though they are a member of a group

All of these can be used to coax them, lead them to the conclusions that

They have been used and abused by those they trust (Democrats, academia, media)

Others have become rich off of their backs

They lack opportunities because of those they trusted who LIED

The "rape culture" they abhor is not American, it's imported, by those they trusted

They feel alone and misunderstood because they have been lied to their entire lives, the truth kept from them, not allowed to grow up

Put in terms they understand, that tug on a piece of them deep inside, appeals to vanity, ego, virtue (heh, but really), insecurity, fear, hope, need to be part of a group, we can bring them over.

This is what our job is, not to bash, belittle, point out their hypocrisy, idiocy and stupidity.

We are not asked to preach to the already converted, but to bring the liberals along.

We have to be smart.

We have to be savvy.

We have to use our wits and intellect.

We're doing this for POTUS and the rest of the world.

>>217964

Well you're welcome do disagree. Do you have any actual counter-arguments?

>>218010

>>218062

My thoughts too. I mean really, Area51 is an intergalactic embassy? Flat/hollow earth bullshit?

Some of the old stuff like Lucius trust, well, like anons said, 20 years ago. Creating not totally illegitimate curiosity into other subjects, but used as red herrings to lead anons away from Q.

And then, there are the "helpers'" helpers…

>>218061

> I think it's fair to note that Conservatives have their own easily-leveraged trigger points. The religious right has used them effectively for years.

Oh absolutely true. However, i don't think that those are the people who are dead set against POTUS' programs or trash-taking out exercise. Do you?

>>218059

I almost typed that :)

>>217993

It would seem safe to assume that here and your reddit space are already being monitored by the FBI. So that faggot could report to his heart's content. If there is no illegal activity going on (I assume not, naturally) then he would be making a false report, no?

Let him report then.

They will look, see nothing illegal and it will come to naught.

>>218112

Agree, just wanted to make sure I wasn't completely missing something :)

>>218086

Who the fuck are you pretending to talk to?

>>218127

That made me actually laugh. I had a secret decoder ring lo' those many years ago.

Yes, you do know, many people know. You know why. Many don't know why. The public will get behind perp-walking VIPs if they understand what their crimes were. The point is that the conservatives will already be on board, it's the liberals we have to convince. And what you said is why I said we have to exploit certain things to get them to that point.

If Democrats see only Republicans perp-walked they are ok.

If Democrats see more Ds than Rs, they will freak.

In order to maintain and perpetuate domestic tranquility, we need to coax them to the point where they will be able to see that D or R, it's TRASH being taken out.