>The US Sen NO Name is John McCain
>Please consider these as the Senators
Continuing Discussion: Nancy Pelosi is more accurately, a US House Representative Member. The House is part of Congress as is the Senate.
Perhaps a better "associative fit" answer to the US Sen NO Name could be derived from the "intelligence source" Insurance Theories Anon statement: noted as "(likely Harry Reid)".
(Harry Reid retired Jan 3, 2017 from the US Senate, which is after the Nov 2016 election, but was an active Senator during the false "Dossier" scheme timeframe.)
The "Intelligence source" used an uncertain term "likely". This infers that there is an indicator that this was "likely" not Harry Reid, as "likely" is a logical "either/or".
If this was intended as a strategic "clue", the letters of L in likely, the H in Harry, and the R in Reid become keys. IN the a.b.c.d. 1.2.3.4 of H as 8, and R as 18, the "1" becomes a clue.
Combining "Likely" L, and h[8]r[18] the "1" becomes an indicator associated with the "L". What could this be? If the "L" were the first letter in a name then the 1 would apply to the HR. H-1 = G[7].
If this is the intended link, then "Li" in Likely is "Li" in Lindsey and G[7] is Graham. Lindsey Graham is a US Senator (verses Nancy Pelosi as a US Represenative).
Another associative link to Lindsey Graham is found in a method proposed by another "intelligence source" in using search engines for wording keys in decoding a stringer. See
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/42055.html#q42055
Using one particular search engine, in searching "NO NAME LINDSEY GRAHAM" the following comes up:
Lindsey Graham on Obamacare Repeal: I Had No Idea What I Was…
Lindsey Graham on Obamacare Repeal: I had NO Idea What I … he figured he and a former senator who is perhaps best known for his NAME becoming a word to …
https://theintercept.com /2017/09/27/lindsey-graham-on-obamacare-repeal-i-had-no-idea-what-i-was-doing/
Given this, I would say that Q was intending the Stringer to be answered with US SEN NO NAMELindsey Graham.
John McCain has been known to have distributed the Dossier to James Comey. This has been revealed in news stories. So John McCain is a "lesser fit" to a "No Name" (i.e. was "known in desiring to distribute" as he had already seemingly "rushed" it to James Comey).
However, since John McCain is a "known" in this "intent to get the information out", the third senator (other than JM, and LG) falls again on the "insurance anon's" clue of "6 of the 9 classified sources".
This same line includes US Senator Chuck Schumer. Since John McCain is a "known", and then LINDSEY GRAHAM is a "best fit" for the 2nd "reveal" of NO NAME, then the "9" in the "confidential sources" seems to be a key to the 3rd Senator.
Taking the "known" of John McCain, as JM, and the "9", translates (M[13]-J[10] = C[3] and J[10]+"9"= 19 = S[19] = CS ) into CS or Chuck Schumer.
(note: the "insurance anon" intelligence posting also had a missing "c" in the spelling of Schumer, which is a "pointer" to "c" being important. In this case it was a "dual" indicator in the repeat of Schultz, and now a pointer to "C" in Chuck).
So to answer your inquiry, Below would be better "associative fit" answers based on the Q decoding methods/techniques:
US SEN NO NAME LINDSEY GRAHAM
US SEN CLAS-1JOHN MCCAIN
US SEN CLAS-2CHUCK SCHUMER
Perhaps the graphic should be updated. This information would be useful to be revealed, but with the appropriate "best fit" association explanation.
————————–