>>168956
"P" HAS to be someONE completely distinguishable by a SINGLE word.
:= P HAS ONE completely distinguishable SINGLE word
P,P,P, powerful powerful powerful, P,P,P and P,P,P, (post 168956), have three sets of P,P,P. This represents a three sided shape such as a Pyramid.
Pyramid is a one single distinguishable word.
Powerful powerful powerful reinforces this three sided shape associated with a power/influence.
The "peak" of the Pyramid would be where the "powerful" is associated as in a capstone "peak".
The "peak" would be the powerful powerful powerful. "P"HAS + onE + singlE annagram = SHAPE. Three sets of threes is a trilateral pyramid. A Trilateral is also associated with 666 in the Trilateral commission logo centered on the peak looking down on a pyramid shape.
Another meaning to the three sets of PPP is overlapping meanings of Three which may include [individuals],[organizations],[entities], working in concert with layers of threes.
E.g. One person proposed a PPP layer such as [entities] in https://8ch.net/cbts/res/2300.html#127218.
(Cerberus, Clowns Tegna/Gannett)
Yet the powerful powerful powerful points to the "All Seeing Eye" capstone, where the power is concentrated. So the question becomes, is the desire for P to be named as a 1 of 3 or 3 in 1?