dChan
Anonymous ID: 5f829c Jan. 6, 2018, 8:23 a.m. No.256234   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6254

>>256225

>Q comes back and posts on /cbts/ normally. Post history is not the same, IP hash is not the same. /cbts/ BO assumes, incorrectly, that this is not Q, even though there are a number of reasons why a post history may start from zero, including changing VPN providers, changing VPN IP locations, using cellular data, resetting your modem, posting from a different location, using a different IP (hotel, restaurant etc.).

>/cbts/ BO deletes those posts.

 

BOARD OWNER BTFO

Anonymous ID: 5f829c Jan. 6, 2018, 8:48 a.m. No.256320   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>256309

"Untrustworthy" is probably the worst possible status for any board owner to have.

Next BO (yes, there does need to be a "next" at this point) needs to be laissez-faire and not famefag his way into controlling/censoring the board.

Anonymous ID: 5f829c Jan. 6, 2018, 8:55 a.m. No.256350   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>256326

Reasonable statement, thank you for taking time to make it.

It seems clear that this board is indeed lost and a switch needs to be made.

Barring a total schism, I'm proposing a migration to /thestorm/ , seeing as Q has posted there and, in so doing, trusts them to do the needful.

We'll have to put up with /thestorm/ BO being a famefag, and we should hold his feet to the fire if he goes the route of /cbts/ BO (irredeemable), but it's the next best place after here.

In the meantime, while public logs would indeed be appreciated, I'm uncertain they'll repair the obfuscation and distrust that has amounted as a result of this incident.

Thank you again, Codemonkey, for everything you do.

Anonymous ID: 5f829c Jan. 6, 2018, 9 a.m. No.256366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6377

>>256363

Love you, MA. Thank you again.

Based on Codemonkey's confirmation that the Q "UW" trip remains uncracked (for now), it may be that the "disputed" posts are indeed legit. I'll leave that designation on your site to your judgment.