Rusty ID: d9de8b April 16, 2020, 4:45 p.m. No.10559   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0570 >>0580

>>10536

 

ya, if there's more than a 30 second gap between breads many anons will freak

kek, I'm almost of the opinion it'd be a good lesson for most of 'em

 

>>10537

>gimme something to write on, maaan o7

anybody got a pencil?

>>10538

thanks teach

 

>not enough rum.

>Never enough rum my friend.

 

why is the bottle always empty?

 

>What do you all think about getting a schedule going where one of us took the class each week?

 

Teaching a subject is the best way to learn about it

 

strange as that sounds

when you think you know enough to teach, you try teaching and then some student will ask a question andโ€ฆ you'll learn something along with the student

 

step one: discovering the process

step two: improving the process

step three: mastering the process

step four: learning to replicate the process in another place

 

<systems analysis

Rusty ID: d9de8b April 16, 2020, 5:42 p.m. No.10658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10645

>when Q posts I immediately drop a notables list, also the new Q, it signals that the baker has it under control and that there won't be any more notables collected till baker is done chasing Q's, they seem to get that

 

very good

I like it when a baker does that

Rusty ID: d9de8b April 16, 2020, 5:49 p.m. No.10671   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0679 >>0706

>>10649

 

ya, nothing wrong with team baking

baker

note taker(s)

 

I saw a great example of team baking during the lag storm recently

baker

baker on TOR

notetaker

 

all pulled it off during a Q posting session

 

I was impressed!

THANK YOU TO THOSE RESPONSIBLE

 

best tradition of the Q kitchen

outstanding!

Rusty ID: d9de8b April 16, 2020, 6:08 p.m. No.10698   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0702 >>0726

>>10688

>Bakers usually set a tone for the bread

 

always

 

from neutral, to leading towards a goal, to echoing a recent item

denigrating, confusing

arousing anger

generally positive

 

the baker always sets the tone of the bread in one way or another

 

with

Bread title

notables

interactions with anons

Rusty ID: d9de8b April 16, 2020, 6:26 p.m. No.10723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10703

>It's tricky bc even shills sometimes have a point.

 

even a blind squirrel finds a nut from time to time

 

>The problem is that they always package it in a way that's designed to create trouble.

 

and that is the 'tell'

the 'give away'

 

malicious

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 17, 2020, 11:17 a.m. No.10763   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0765 >>0768 >>0782

>>10762

>announce my presence and that I have only 1 or 2 bakes in that exact time slot or none and see if bakers want a break

 

do exactly that

bakers can't read minds

link to the dough post and announce you're available for a bake or two if a break is needed

 

do that any time you have the opportunity and the itch to bake

 

also

in fast breads collect notables

offer to help collect notables

many bakers like the help

 

a few object to "team baking" but I say ignore 'em

it works

it works well on several levels

Rusty ID: d9de8b April 20, 2020, 5:01 a.m. No.10842   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0843 >>0845

>>10840

you were and are delusional

the "logic" behind your actions was flawed

 

you went ban happy

banned entire IP ranges by your own admission

 

banned me mid-bake because you "didn't agree with my evidence"

 

banned other anons for similarly flimsy reasons

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 21, 2020, 4:29 p.m. No.10900   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0905

I saw this reported earlier

>>>/qresearch/8878243

>new trick

>when you start the catalog thread, pull up index page at same time, thread comes right through, all day, mystified

>cosmic singularity and all that

>o7

 

big if true

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 21, 2020, 4:49 p.m. No.10904   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0908

>>10902

I could pin them all

 

>Which would take up top half of catalog. So not ideal.

 

make the catalog a little clunky but I have no objection

 

>Right now, i'm just bumping them every so often

 

not ideal either

 

I'm open to suggestions

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 23, 2020, 6:51 a.m. No.10981   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

wellโ€ฆ something has rattled a few cagesโ€ฆ

 

LOLI spam flooding the bread and flooding the board

 

causing a problem for baker trying to post new bread

>pic related

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 23, 2020, 1:37 p.m. No.11028   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1030 >>1039

>>11013

 

when all files by โ€ฆโ€ฆ.. IP HASH get deletedโ€ฆ

 

it seems that some who actually contributed something that got into notables were also posting LOLI in a later thread

OR

someone posting LOLI had an IP from (VPN / TOR) that had been used to post the notable

 

take a look at the board log

>pic related

 

to see part of the extent of the raid this morning

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 23, 2020, 1:44 p.m. No.11032   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1036 >>1045

>>11030

>made some mistakes when banning posters?

 

most likely not

 

many IPs are shared (VPN / TOR)

and if you noticed the LOLI spammerz were IP hoping like march hares on meth

 

I'd think that is the reason OR some anons are playing both sidesโ€ฆ posting good stuff and bad stuff

 

like we don't see that in this thread already

Anonymous ID: d9de8b April 23, 2020, 2:21 p.m. No.11055   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1058

>>11047

>do u know them?

 

?

I don't personally know any anons

I've had interactions with anons here and on other boards and with time and multiple interactions comes some familiarity

I think I may have had interactions with two of those BVs

ChrisHansen may be one

Orochi may be one

 

I know nothing for sure

I can prove nothing

Rusty !!!ZWQ2M2M1MjE4YjA3 ID: d9de8b notice from CM April 23, 2020, 3:20 p.m. No.11076   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1079 >>1081 >>1089 >>1095 >>1100 >>1105

# 18 U.S. Code ยงโ€ฏ1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

โ€” by codemonkey at 04/22/20 (Wed) 01:28:04

 

Based on the legal analysis of our attorney and upon being informed about a 2018 case (United States v. Eychaner), I would like to inform you that obscene visual representations or obscene visual depictions of children are currently illegal under United States federal law. Per the current interpretation of the applicable federal statute (18 U.S. Code ยงโ€ฏ1466A), said obscene content includes "a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" (this is what the law says) and does not require "that the minor depicted actually exist."

 

https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-eychaner-1

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

 

To find out what obscene is, please refer to the Miller test.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

 

Given the scrutiny the website has been under, I think it is very likely that, one way or another, because of public pressure, users would end up in legal jeopardy over this and this is not something any administrator wants. What I want is free speech within the boundaries of the law. As it is, obscene material is not protected speech under the First Amendment. That may change in the future as the so-called "community standards" become less strict. However, this is the hand we've been dealt.

 

As such, any user who posts obscene visual representations or obscene visual depictions of children will be banned permanently and the content will be deleted. Until further notice, that is how all volunteers, global and local, will be instructed to handle such content.