I don't feel tardy
Greetings all,
Hello and welcome to all who seek to learn to bake and those here to increase their skills, special thanks to teach and all the bakers who make it all possible
ya, if there's more than a 30 second gap between breads many anons will freak
kek, I'm almost of the opinion it'd be a good lesson for most of 'em
>gimme something to write on, maaan o7
anybody got a pencil?
thanks teach
>not enough rum.
>Never enough rum my friend.
why is the bottle always empty?
>What do you all think about getting a schedule going where one of us took the class each week?
Teaching a subject is the best way to learn about it
strange as that sounds
when you think you know enough to teach, you try teaching and then some student will ask a question and… you'll learn something along with the student
step one: discovering the process
step two: improving the process
step three: mastering the process
step four: learning to replicate the process in another place
<systems analysis
when it gets over 600 I find the update function slow at best
over 600 I just refresh the page periodicly
you might want to look at /newsplus/
it's a board that is seeking to provide an alternate platform for journalists of all types
independent
small local
regional
specialty
agree
>when Q posts I immediately drop a notables list, also the new Q, it signals that the baker has it under control and that there won't be any more notables collected till baker is done chasing Q's, they seem to get that
very good
I like it when a baker does that
ya, nothing wrong with team baking
baker
note taker(s)
I saw a great example of team baking during the lag storm recently
baker
baker on TOR
notetaker
all pulled it off during a Q posting session
I was impressed!
THANK YOU TO THOSE RESPONSIBLE
best tradition of the Q kitchen
outstanding!
>Bakers usually set a tone for the bread
always
from neutral, to leading towards a goal, to echoing a recent item
denigrating, confusing
arousing anger
generally positive
the baker always sets the tone of the bread in one way or another
with
Bread title
notables
interactions with anons
>It's tricky bc even shills sometimes have a point.
even a blind squirrel finds a nut from time to time
>The problem is that they always package it in a way that's designed to create trouble.
and that is the 'tell'
the 'give away'
malicious
>announce my presence and that I have only 1 or 2 bakes in that exact time slot or none and see if bakers want a break
do exactly that
bakers can't read minds
link to the dough post and announce you're available for a bake or two if a break is needed
do that any time you have the opportunity and the itch to bake
also
in fast breads collect notables
offer to help collect notables
many bakers like the help
a few object to "team baking" but I say ignore 'em
it works
it works well on several levels
you were and are delusional
the "logic" behind your actions was flawed
you went ban happy
banned entire IP ranges by your own admission
banned me mid-bake because you "didn't agree with my evidence"
banned other anons for similarly flimsy reasons
I saw this reported earlier
>>>/qresearch/8878243
>new trick
>when you start the catalog thread, pull up index page at same time, thread comes right through, all day, mystified
>cosmic singularity and all that
>o7
big if true
well… something has rattled a few cages…
LOLI spam flooding the bread and flooding the board
causing a problem for baker trying to post new bread
>pic related
KEK
when all files by …….. IP HASH get deleted…
it seems that some who actually contributed something that got into notables were also posting LOLI in a later thread
OR
someone posting LOLI had an IP from (VPN / TOR) that had been used to post the notable
take a look at the board log
>pic related
to see part of the extent of the raid this morning
>made some mistakes when banning posters?
most likely not
many IPs are shared (VPN / TOR)
and if you noticed the LOLI spammerz were IP hoping like march hares on meth
I'd think that is the reason OR some anons are playing both sides… posting good stuff and bad stuff
like we don't see that in this thread already
>do u know them?
?
I don't personally know any anons
I've had interactions with anons here and on other boards and with time and multiple interactions comes some familiarity
I think I may have had interactions with two of those BVs
ChrisHansen may be one
Orochi may be one
I know nothing for sure
I can prove nothing
# 18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
— by codemonkey at 04/22/20 (Wed) 01:28:04
Based on the legal analysis of our attorney and upon being informed about a 2018 case (United States v. Eychaner), I would like to inform you that obscene visual representations or obscene visual depictions of children are currently illegal under United States federal law. Per the current interpretation of the applicable federal statute (18 U.S. Code § 1466A), said obscene content includes "a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" (this is what the law says) and does not require "that the minor depicted actually exist."
https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-eychaner-1
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
To find out what obscene is, please refer to the Miller test.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test
Given the scrutiny the website has been under, I think it is very likely that, one way or another, because of public pressure, users would end up in legal jeopardy over this and this is not something any administrator wants. What I want is free speech within the boundaries of the law. As it is, obscene material is not protected speech under the First Amendment. That may change in the future as the so-called "community standards" become less strict. However, this is the hand we've been dealt.
As such, any user who posts obscene visual representations or obscene visual depictions of children will be banned permanently and the content will be deleted. Until further notice, that is how all volunteers, global and local, will be instructed to handle such content.
>IDEA: ask anons to report it. Best way is if they formally accept responsibility and list the posts reported. Biblefags will step up.
I concur
I say
give 'em all the rope they want, sometimes they tie pretty knots as they hang themselves