Rusty ID: 0b54f8 April 23, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.11234   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1243

>>11213

greetings

things are tolerably well

the classes are helping with anon baker interactions and the number of bakers seems to be growing

morale is good

the board is good

much excitement this morning, I hope you didn't miss it

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 24, 2020, 8:57 a.m. No.11528   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11523

>Just gotta learn how to snipe like a lot of ya now.

 

KEK

sniping is as much a science as it is an art

you can use ctrl-F to gauge bread speed

for example the bread started at 15:31:07 and it's now 16:15 and the bread is at 600 postsโ€ฆ

ctrl-F 15:4 will yield the number of posts within that 10 minute period

ctrl-F 15:5 yields the number of posts from next ten minute period

ctrl-F 16:0

ctrl-F 16:1

 

and now you have a good idea of posting speed in posts per 10 minute intervals

 

divide by 10 = posts per minute

 

that will help a little in estimating posting speed so you know when to post in order to get the snipe

 

of course the posting rate surges and ebbs and that is what makes it an art as well as a science

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 24, 2020, 6:48 p.m. No.11537   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11535

>in the sense of open collaboration. Using the entire buffalo is messy, but it works.

 

>a group of bakers with a consensus is something the shills do not want.

 

the diggers dig and only want a comfy space to place the gems they've found for all to see

 

Q requires space that will chronicle and intelligently analyze the drops

 

CM & crew provide the platform

FJ & crew provide the board

BAKERS provide the daily bread that provides a constantly updated synopsis of recent postings, a reference list of useful links and a tabula rasa for all to post in

 

some will do almost anything to see this movement fail

 

bakers see that every bread

learning to bake shows you a side of the bread most don't see and that side includes those who would for unknown reasons seek to impede rather than contribute or improve

bakers provide continuity

and now can help provide community

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 28, 2020, 3:50 a.m. No.11584   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1588 >>1591

>>11580

>>11577

>>11578

 

from #11437

baker posted notables at 400 and a comment about one of the notables...

>>>/qresearch/8935878

 

missed or ignored...

 

baked, handed off and then...

 

from #11438

 

>>>/qresearch/8936393

>>>/qresearch/8936535

>>>/qresearch/8936580

>>>/qresearch/8936613

>>>/qresearch/8936765

>>>/qresearch/8936855

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 28, 2020, 7:10 a.m. No.11589   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1590 >>1591

>>11588

 

<SPOON FEED

 

>each baker's comments can only reflect on themselves

 

so very true

and the example that each baker sets not only reflects upon themselves but the board in general

 

I think the "spoon feed" concept is a subject for baker debate

 

after all isn't that part of what we do?

is creating a coherent synopsis equivalent to 'spoon feeding' ?

 

how are they similar and how are they different

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 28, 2020, 6:50 p.m. No.11600   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1604

>>11592

>Still don't know who that particular baker in question was,

 

I found it very telling during that interaction with that baker that the defense to a poorly chosen tag line for a notable was "served it's purpose" and "spoon feed you"

 

as if it were totally beneath that baker's dignity to correctly and succinctly tag that notable for the plebs

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 9:11 a.m. No.11666   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1667 >>1683

>>11664

it is a valid point

page 3 can use a bit of condensing

If I had done the consolidation to pastebin of those links I think I would have put them all into one pastebin and used the full links not the abbreviated board links

Germany #51 >>8839115

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/8839115.html

 

UK #13 >>8758105

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/8758105.html

 

and the Q map sections

Q Graphics all in GMT

Q Graphics all in GMT #01 - #10 >>>/comms/486, >>>/comms/487, >>>/comms/488, >>>/comms/489, >>>/comms/490

Q Graphics all in GMT #11 - #20 >>>/comms/491, >>>/comms/545, >>>/comms/950, >>>/comms/951, >>>/comms/952, >>>/comms/953, >>>/comms/987, >>>/comms/1103

Q Graphics all in GMT #21 - #27 >>>/comms/1119, >>>/comms/1156, >>>/comms/1286, >>>/comms/1288, >>>/comms/1303, >>>/comms/1307, >>>/comms/1462

Q Graphics all in GMT #28 - #34 >>>/comms/1466, >>>/comms/1489, >>>/comms/2071, >>>/comms/2072, >>>/comms/2073, >>>/comms/2100, >>>/comms/2164

Q Graphics all in GMT #35 - #41 >>>/comms/2176, >>>/comms/2228, >>>/comms/2229, >>>/comms/2261, >>>/comms/2268, >>>/comms/2270, >>>/comms/2274

Q Graphics all in GMT #42 - #48 >>>/comms/2306, >>>/comms/2312, >>>/comms/2314, >>>/comms/2327, >>>/comms/2450, >>>/comms/2491, >>>/comms/2496

Q Graphics all in GMT #49 - #55 >>>/comms/2520, >>>/comms/2528, >>>/comms/2605, >>>/comms/2801, >>>/comms/2831, >>>/comms/2869, >>>/comms/2981

Q Graphics all in GMT #56 - #62 >>>/comms/2990, >>>/comms/2996, >>>/comms/3019, >>>/comms/3116, >>>/comms/3187, >>>/comms/3464, >>>/comms/3472

Q Graphics all in GMT #63 - #69 >>>/comms/3687, >>>/comms/3688, >>>/comms/3701, >>>/comms/3702, >>>/comms/3858, >>>/comms/3859, >>>/comms/3882

Q Graphics all in GMT #70 - #76 >>>/comms/3898, >>>/comms/3920, >>>/comms/3975, >>>/comms/4029, >>>/comms/4197, >>>/comms/4335, >>>/comms/4386

Q Graphics all in GMT #77 - #83 >>>/comms/4388, >>>/comms/4423, >>>/comms/4443, >>>/comms/4684, >>>/comms/5035, >>>/comms/5044, >>>/comms/5228

Q Graphics all in GMT #84 - #90 >>>/comms/5510, >>>/comms/5577, >>>/comms/5622, >>>/comms/5699, >>>/comms/5700, >>>/comms/5773, >>>/comms/5806

Q Graphics all in GMT #91 - #97 >>>/comms/5811, >>>/comms/5890, >>>/comms/5975, >>>/comms/6045, >>>/comms/6083, >>>/comms/6843, >>>/comms/9187

Q Graphics all in GMT #98 - #101 >>>/comms/10292, >>>/comms/10459, >>>/comms/11608 , >>8961503

 

could easily be

 

Q map graphics

Q Graphics all in GMT #98 - #101 >>>/comms/10292, >>>/comms/10459, >>>/comms/11608 , >>8961503

 

Archive of Q map graphics >>>/comms/283

Rusty ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 9:48 a.m. No.11673   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1681

>>11667

>that is a shill tactic

 

we'll see

 

>>11669

>hey, it's fits the page, that's all I care

 

clarity, readability, ease of use and accuracy also count for something

 

hopefully the anon in question will show up here and we can discuss this without the hurried atmosphere of /qresearch/ general

>>>/qresearch/8973193

>pic related

Anonymous ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 2:28 p.m. No.11713   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1715

>>11702

>but the idea of the reasoning behind removing it, is important to consider.

 

war of attrition

 

by the necessity of time one must from time to time accede to the enemy

 

changing the wording while keeping the meaning is one method of combating this type of censorship

Rusty ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 3:39 p.m. No.11731   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1739

>>11722

>Too much, too quickly.

>Slow down and let us think more and act less for now.

>Appreciate the wish to improve, but it feels like a whizzing train.

 

I agree totally

none of this is urgent

but all of it does deserve consideration and contemplation

what better place than here

 

btw. is someone baking tonight's class thread?

Rusty ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 3:45 p.m. No.11737   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1739

>>11729

>that's pretty damn ironic on the boards of the bakers' club.

 

<some club 'eh?

those rumors still rankle

you see this place for what it is

an open forum for those with interest in baking

 

>>11732

>for whomever created it.

 

a collaborative effort that evolved over time

Rusty ID: 0b54f8 April 30, 2020, 3:53 p.m. No.11741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1744

>>11739

>saying that i echo shills who spend hours complaining, and that's not what i want to do at all

 

I know

that's why I invited you here

I am very glad you came here

I am very happy you are contributing to the conversation

 

new view points are welcome and will be vigorously debated

 

as for how much change is too much too quick?

I dunno any good answer for that