please post yer stuff in >>323 this thread is the BAKER's chat
if you start spamming ITT I'll delete the stuff and ban you too
If you have a lot of really important stuff, make a thread here on /comms/
hava nice day
>Sorry it's so many
no worries anon
I'm happy you are growing
I think you're probably wise in the removal of links etc… some of the things here might not reflect well on a professional reputation.
I'll get the rest of the stuff cleaned up soon, I only did a few to get confirmation it was you requesting the deletions.
It can get quite stressful when the bake doesn't go quite right. One poor anon got caught trying to bake while the graphic systems was borked, he ended up using a video because graphics wouldn't load due to the thumbnail generator having a conniption.
Welcome to the Kitchen :)
>Can I post a thread on the QResearch board and then request that it be deleted?
NO do NOT practice bake at /qresearcdh/, if you want to practice, practice here at /comms/
That is why I made this board.
If you pay attention you'll see a code that will let you delete your own thread.
>pic related
You are welcome.
no worries BAKER anon on the name thing.
So far the need for handles / avatars / names hasn't come up.
It sometimes comes in handy once in a while, but for most purposes we are all anons.
needed to change tripcode
I'll be around for the next 4~6 hr and I'll monitor this thread.
I love it that new bakers are stepping up to learn.
Baking is sort of like juggling…
Most people drop the ball a time or two during the learning process
So do not get discouraged
Do NOT worry about clowns, shills & haters
Keep trying and learning and you'll be baking like a pro before you know it
was an interesting evening
I feel sure that learning experiences were had
experience is the best teacher
cowboy up, don't be afraid to admit mistakes, dust yourself off and get back on that horse!
>Am I correct in assuming that on the Q research board, next to the name is a field labeled 'ID' (for example, mine was '9c1564'), which represents some sort of hashed copy of the person's IP address?
yes, yours is (I'm posting a copy of what I see at the top of your post)
Baker ID system proposal J !OlcPsstCIA [sMAw6olG] 06/26/18 (Tue) 12:42:57 993e85 No.1435
with the [sMAw6olG] part is the IP hash I see for you and your bread ID is 993e85
only BO & BVs can see the IP hash but every body sees the bread ID, but it changes from bread to bread :~(
the !OlcPsstCIA part is the secure part that nobody else can duplicate unless they spend some serious time cracking it. I can sign in as;
anonymous
Rusty
Rusty !!uoLnJpgdTQ
## Bored Owner
>And am I correct in assuming you guys largely don't use proxies? Or, to put it more plainly, you use generally 'fairly' static IPs? By fairly static, I mean 'remains consistent for the duration of it's use' (EG 24 hours).
I do not have much data on very many of the bakers, there are only a couple that have used this board and their has seems to be static (not hopping around)
>And would it be possible to get the same ID system enabled on this board?
it already is.
it's called tripcodes here
I wanted positive ID for bakers here so all could be sure who they were talking to
must have ID to chastise errant baker
must have ID to help sincere baker student
must have ID to trade style hints & baking tips
btw don't worry about
>>1436 the 'Baking School' has had off topic posts from the get-go
due to the tripcodes here you can always be sure of who you are talking to
IF anons use it
anonymous is still anonymous here and that can make it hard to track who said what unless you're BO or BV
in re: Baker's ID
I find famefags repugnant but I also believe we need a method of BAKER ID
I needed to say that upfront to help understand how I came to this position and where I think we should go from here.
How can you properly chastise a baker if you don't know which one is which?
we need some standards for notables, several have been posted including a decent (imo) graphic
holding bakers accountable for their mistakes is the 1st step in helping bakers improve
we all have room for improvement
any suggestions would be appreciated.
The way I see it the TC should be used for;
handoffs & baker to baker verification
answering questions in the bread that require a baker's authority
marking the dough
the same TC will be usable at /comms/ and we'll use it there to grow and learn our craft
If not baking it should be used for 1 (one) post to notify others that a baker is available. This should be the 1st post a standby baker makes, all others should be anonymous
Reasons for immediate removal from the whitelist should include but not be limited by;
using the TC on any other board than /qresearch/ and /comms/ unless OK'd by BO
repeated offenses without improvement
subversive activity ~ sabotaging breads ~ spreading lies ~cooperation / collaboration with clowns & shills
being voted out by strawpoll of the general population of anons (poor discernment / critical thinking skills might be a reason)
I would suggest the following procedure for new bakers
go to /comms/ https://8ch.net/comms/catalog.html and generate a TC by posting at /comms/ with ## yourSecretPassPhrase then bake at least one practice bread using the TC
Then when ready to try real time training copy the TC and put it into the name field after the name Apprentice
go to current /qresearch/ bread and post in bread telling baker you want to learn to bake
follow instructions from BAKERs and BO / BVs
I think an appropriate training is a parallel bake with the BAKER posting the bread and Apprentice posting at /comms/ at an agreed post count. (700)
In a bread where a baker is training an apprentice the BAKER should announce 'training bake' and not post 'notables found so far' lists and give no hints to the Apprentice.
The Apprentice baker should gather the current dough along their own notables list and Q posts and at post count ? post the 'real time practice bread' at /comms/ complete with original bread title just as if it were a real bake at /qresearch.
The quality of the bake along with the timestamps will be the exam.
does he hop IPs?
I've been on the lookout for certain hashes since >>>/qresearch/1891030 was posted
6PxplWoa
Tlh7CF4S
f0CLh10
6PxplWoa shows up in >>776 but is not OP
if you want I'll grant you BV status here at /comms/ so you can provide independent verification on who is who and help keep track of these 'anons'
let me know what username you want and I'll email you the password.
let me know if you want BV privileges here by picking a username you want and I'll e-mail the password to you.
As for the baker in question I don't know if it's worth the effort to attempt reform or not.
I was banned mid bake too during the 'great pre-Valentines day BanHammerFest'
and I've held no grudges and not fallen into the comp'd BS because the things I've seen all can be explained by differences in experience & taste.