so
that was me
asking for clarification of handoff/ pastebin etc
barkeep baker from /end back during the deplatforming
>Nice. Leave him to it.
>kek
>caught bein ful on'strange' yo
>No joke yo. kek
>bwahahahaha
>sorry
anyone care to tell me whats so funny?
or is laughing at anons learning the ropes what your baking class is about?
>Very different from what you experienced in recent conversations on the /baker meta/ thread, isn't it?
no, not at all actually
I have no problem with the conversations on META, have been very informative and helpful.
but when I come over here to check things out;
and
I see someone has posted screenshots of me;
"heya guise, looks what I found over on that OTHER baker page (snicker snicker)"
"just leave him to it, kek (snicker snicker)"
"caught being full on strange (snicker snicker)"
"No joke yo. kek (snicker snicker)"
"bwahahahahahahahah. sorry (outright laighter, with laughing pepe meme)"
go ahead and gaslight me, and tell me that I didnt read that correctly
>not you, and not about you at all, once again they were laughin at me, not you
>bwahahahaha
>sorry
doc posts screenies of my question, saying "caught this on that OTHER bakers META"
the above poster replies to that with single line
"bahahahahahaahhaahaha"
He is laughing at doc for posting a screenie?
He is laughing at doc for even being in that OTHER bakers META?
He is laughing at doc for ansering my question?
OR
He is laughing at newbaker for playing in the wrong sandbox?
for the record
I am not "probinf" for anything
I came over here to scan the convo
see what I was missing
and I find a clique of bakers finding it really funny that newbaker is in the "wrong thread" for baker talk (as determined by the 'official' bakerfam)
good fucking times
o7
>This statement as written is disingenuous.
>I've been baking since May of 2018, can prove authorship back to July of same year. Al the bakers did there shit right in the stream… until /comms/ came along.
thank you for confirming kb
past month+ has been incredibly enlightening
o7
[Moldy Bread Campaign]
>Anyone ever see memes like these made about other bakers and spammed over and over when they bake?
nope
I dont see durrogtory memes about ANY bakers other than OSS
and I see them posted in EVERY BREAD, all day long, regardless who is baking
>you admitted it in one of the classes (when all this non-sense started) so spare me righteous indignation.
sauce for claim?
with no sauce
anons cannot digest pasta
OSS has always been OSS to this anon
>don't need to prove anything to you
well, this anon also requests proof
or are you just making claims to see what sticks?
anon
>reminds me of TYB -stirs ship up andjust leaves
(presumably OSS)
>I didnt leave, I have been here the whole time
i.e. refuting the claim that he (OSS) fits the profile of TYB
NOTadmitting to to implied accusation
does this person think anons are literally retarded?
autism is a spectrum, fren
>He mentioned my name, I didn't mention his.
>Just as last night when it was reported notables got changed. I have no way to prove it
I have proof for an example I saw
>>26957 (me)
>>26965 (baker) thanks for posting this, sauce?
>>26993 (me) sauced, links, pastebins of on duty bakers
>>26994 (me) same sauce, now with propper formatting (cross board)
links long broken now, but they were fresh when I reported
the caps prove I was asking why it was removed at least
>>27271 (me)
>here is the qbin for theconfirmed baker that bunned the note
bunned by baker, not by random note-taker anon
>So it appears WnB removed the notes?
>sincerely curious why
>o7
still have yet to get an answer from wnb
you here man? I got nothing but respect you (wnb)
just wonder whats up with the above?
this other anon thinks it could have been imposter baker:
-->>>/qresearch/10767241
-->>>/qresearch/10767307
-->>>/qresearch/10767374
shrug
would still like an answer
o7