>>29124

>He is obviously allowed to do what he does there must be a reason for it

OSS built up some notoriety for being a no-nonsense baker. That allowed them some leeway (from the anons) when they took the actions they took against Franklin88.

It appears now that F88 was only the foil for OSS's real intent of getting consensus for his next actions, unfortunately for F88. OSS played it pretty good up until he started blaming anons for not seeing his contribution as prescient as he, himself did.

That is when OSS lost me. As I stated to them.

I doubt anons would stand for that again from them, tbh. You have to have an exceptional and clear-cut reason to commandeer a bake, and their reasoning at the time was agreed with by anons….

but time changes all things. Events have called their motives into serious question.

>>29335

o7

>>29353

>>29362

put

bakerfagname ###yousupersekratphrase

in the name field. done.

remember yousupersekratphrase and don't put it in the title or email fields ;p

>>29356

My interactions with them in the /qr/ meta were.. interesting.

I definitely felt like the questions I got were designed specifically for me. Made me very glad I trust myself and document my shit…

>>29406

>the uhm.. trifecta

it's looking like assets were burned in that latest purported trap. Serious ammo was consumed.

It took a hot minute to answer my own question in that stream. Wonder why?

Reputations really do go to /qr/ to die, if they are not real. Wasn't joking, or going for the cool quip :)

>>29411

Shadilay o7

>>29420

since when have any of the actors not overplayed whatever their hand is? give it another month :D

>>29422

>went hmmmmmm.

>sounds familiar

yes it does. it was basically a repackaged "baker union busters" all over again. The way things have played out…. kek…. Complete with muddy waters

>>29439

KEK!

>>29449

imo, there's no reason to not monitor it. It belongs to the anons now.

That is the exact reason I suggested making it cyclical to OSS and qr BO: Now no one anon controls that thread anymore.

So OSS can not control that thread's post body anymore, nor can any of the other players, if there were any intentions to do so. The only person that can change it now is the BO or a BV.

>>29450

o7

>>29676

>QRB

>LOCKED

Are you saying that one of the community board just popped?

>>29685

> 3bd4a0

I'm letting my own opinion on it stand. I don't care that /qr/ has a dough meta; the anons will control that just like they control their choice of bread.. At least now it is cyclical so the mission statement in the headpost can not change.

I will not be asking for the /qr/ BO to change shit.

I don't disagree with any of your historical points of reference, either.

and

I do not believe the /qr/ meta warrants a place in the dough, it is already pinned, and cyclical, making the premise of that being in the dough very weak, as I already told OSS…. and really kind of fucking gay at this point.

Final comment on that stupid bullshit. Because it was stupid bullshit from the start. In April. As I also told OSS. Only way to keep it at arms length is to document your shit.

-out

>>29717

For those who don't monitor the other meta: >>>/doughlist/153

>>29739

I'm sorry you feel that way. Why the rancor?

>>29741

I'm osrry you feel that way too. I have just as much a right to my opinion as you do.

I still consider you a great baker. I'll even hand off to you. But this isn't appreciated.

>>29742

So others can take vacations.. disappear.. watever,

and I'm now under attack because I chose to observe, instead of bake?

What is this?

I'm sorry you feel threatened by my opinions.

>>29745

show me my duplicity.

I baked steadily up until july 20th, when I saw what whent on in warrroom, and chose to stop and observe.

I've here as long as you and you know it.

>>29745

on top of it, i've never accused you of anything. AT ALL.

So I truly do not understand why you are suddenly attacking me like this.

>>29748

yup. I see it. anons will figure it out.

Reputations go to qr to die. Don't let yours be one of them.

I'm not interested in attacking you, but it's clear I've said something that offends you.

Sorry?

>>29752

If I had as much time as you do I would be baking right now, be sure of it.

>>29753

>us

dude.

I give my opinion as an individual, to other individuals who congregate here.

Soo. they can each discard or like it as they choose ;)

>>29756

You're going to keep attacking me?

Don't you know? vaca is over. OSS melting down was the end of my vaca.

When I've got a clear 2 hours, you'll see me baking.

>>29758

>>29761

so what exactly did I say that made you so mad?

I want to know now, so I can decixde whether to recant it or not.

I never thougth I would be run out of the kitch by… you?

Really baker?

>>29761

well, I'll still hand off to you in the stream I guess, but have a great day. Be interesting to see if you hand off to me going forward.

>>29765

Shove your sanctimonious shit up your own ass baker. See you in the stream.

>>29767

>Keep them to yourself in that case.

NO.

-out

>>29761

and, I MADE that mame.

How the fuck do you think I was able to use it in July of 2018?

>>29767

literally the only reason i HAVE proof is because assholes made it so I HAD TO identify.

Id been BAKING AS ANON for ALMOST TWO FUCKING YEARS AS ANON, COMPLETE ANON, no BIN ACCOUNT AND ALL.

except for that one time a BO iden'ed me, and starting with this stupid OSS bullshit..

so FUCK YOU.

>>29772

>>29774

I don't owe you any answers, my position on the drama you were involved in is on record.

Are you saying that my opinion would be discarded as an anon? This has been a very revealing conversation.

Good luck in the stream. o7

>>29770

fucked up thing, is I used that in a baker backup post, and the BO called me kekbees anyway ;p

>>29780

>>29780

Isn't the seminar open to all anons?

ones learning to bake? ie- NON BAKERS?

But continue…

>>29787

uh, no. I'm pointing out your relativism.

Anons who don't bake are welcome.

But I'm not because I chose to not bake lately? Really?

>>29788

o7

>>29792

It's ok. I'm done here. bye now. take it up with me in one of the metas.

>>29802

If I am not welcome here, then you can talk to me in the stream.

I continue to support comms, show me where I withdrew it. Faggot.

>>29802

This is a sem thread you idiot.

>>29802

As a matter of fact I told Rusty personally that I suppported them in a sem thread so go fuck youself.

>>29802

Eould you like me to you you my screan cap supoprting Rusty's comms board? Faggot?

>>29814

o7

>>29802

see you in comms meta, faggot.

>>29821

fwiw, do you think OSS would have taken my advice and asked for a cyclical, if I hadn't stayed NEUTRAL?

until I personally had all of the information I needed to discern shit to make my own opinion known?

After that was done? I do containment and this fucker shits all over me. Thanks NB!

>>29824

Because, anons are the king of this anons mountain.

Believe it bakerfam. I was an anon first

>>29821

As far as you, this whole thing stinks like pro wrestling.

You both are two peas in a pod.

See you in the stream o7

>>29824 this

was meant for you >>29822

, not oss.

>>29829

sorry, I'll be in the metas only going forward,.

both of them.