Take my comments and observations for what they are worth, hopefully constructive.

I am anon-anon, just someone who never posted on any of the chan boards until Q research. You seem to be a group that wants to keep the board running smoothly, although some proposals in this thread do concern me.

1. I think it is important to keep QR as a neutral environment where anon contributors from all over the worlds can come and feel productive. After getting over the initial revulsion of the typical daily distractions and shill crap, it is essential that anons feel like they can make a difference and advance the research and causes outlined by Q.

1. As a neutral environment, QR must avoid at all costs seeming like a 'club', or a faction, or a group of buddies who just landed here from /pol/ or wherever. That is why there is extreme reaction to the anime bakers. But it is also why there is extreme reaction to "comms" bakers. Most of us don't know WTF Comms is, but if this other person is calling you out as the problem, then he just created an awareness. "You mean there is a group of bakers who hand off breads to each other? THAT sounds suspicious." I think you can see the problem here, if you look at it from anon-anon perspective. Admittedly it is our own fault for not understanding bakes. For all I know, Comms could be the glue holding everything together. If you are, then you need to consider the optics here.

1. Comms bakers, lets assume you are the good guys, but you have effectively invited this outsider person to attack your weakness. Every time you refer to each other as KB, or FB, or Doc, or whoever…you have broken the invisible trust. Now anon-anons can see that there are indeed a group of 'buddies' having outside comms with each other, making plans about the board. Even if they are good plans, but how would anons know that? It comes across as subversion, even if it is well intended. Advice = PLEASE stop referring to each other in the breads, you are just creating a rash of shit. Keep neutral, keep anon.

1. One of you seems to be recommending a new board where 'real' anons can gather, and leave QR behind to collect all the shills and continue as the shit-show it has turned into. As anon-anon, I COULD NOT DISAGREE MORE. Q Research is Q's board. NO outside comms. It is the place intended for the collected research. Splitting into something new is cool, hey I'm sure there are lots of other boards. But aligning with QR in any way would in fact hurt QR. Ask yourselves if you really want to do that, before considering yourselves as the 'good guys' in this situation.

1. Lately there have been non-stop attempts at changing the QR graphic. Is this a Comms effort? And if so, why on earth would you want to piss off most anons who want to see this graphic unchanged? If it is not a Comms effort, are you doing anything to help push the original graphic? When anon-anons see shit like this, it only re-enforces the belief that the kitchen is out of control, and there are indeed baker wars going on. If you contend that baker wars a myth, then help restore order and harmony to the bakes.

1. Back to Point 1. Assuming you are the good guys, you are absolutely critical in the mission Q has set us on. Everyone appreciates a neutral, well done bake. Permit me to add, it is impossible for bakers to look neutral when they are posting 30 times in a bread, putting spam in notables, and generally causing mayhem. Presumably this is why you have these Comms breads, and I can only hope and encourage you to push some responsible standards to the bakers you train.

1. Please PLEASE understand the mindset of anon-anons, who are probably the vast majority of people in QR. We don't give a shit about gamergate, we haven't spent our adult lives on chan boards, and we don't know or care about individual personalities. The more of us who are drawn to QR to participate, the quicker the evil in the world can be exposed and our loved ones can be red pilled. That is why we are here.