Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:04 p.m. No.40601   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0603 >>0615 >>0823

>>40560

>>40564

great work summarizing, thanks.

 

a)fixbred

while i don't disagree with your description, at the minimum, it just means having a running working bread, not dueling spam battles…

and those battles, power struggles brought on by the shilling/bake war/OSS/reasons are in my mind more what is meant by

b) tidy up

since the bread problems are the symptom, and the warring the cause.

since the shilling is relentless, even if anons can be just as stubborn, that's still just an impasse.

we're at an unfortunate necessity to discuss difficult questions of management - and the new board provides an interesting experiment in that regard, because a new, assumedly authoritarian approach is taken, whereas apparently the fully open principle remains active on qr, as only in most extreme/illegal cases does mgmt intervene.

Thing is, i get it, normally i'm with the all open too: for principle, but also because moderation changes the dynamic (basically platform/publisher, same as for social media): if any shill can post what they want on board, then we can't be blamed for the content. Of course we are anyway, but that's still another question.

BUT, after years in this, it seems that there can be appeal to one principle, that parallels Q recommendations of thinking for oneself, and recognizing how vital that is to grasping the finer points of the crumbs as well : the obvious.

What is obvious cannot always easily be proven, if at all. But to a living human mind, the obvious is obvious.

In our situation, to me at least it is obvious that ebot is a nuisance, and so are plenty other less glaring shills. If i were to be moderator, i think i could work with a principle of separation of content and method/quantity: basically shiposting vs spam.

Shiposting: pretty much anything goes, have at it.

Spam: now here's where it gets trickier. But to take an easy example, those fucking redhead from behind 5pics posts that became sigils or something… never figured quite what's going on there, but damn, i'd just blast that so fast.

Sure, they'll hop on with another IP, but good, make em use it. That's what having many BVs is all about, isn't it?

 

anyway.

this is still just musings about how to exert a moderation authority with transparency, and even more vitally: legitimacy.

haven't even really touched on the fact that the very discrete mgmt of qr has not done much lately to increase my confidence in them, regretfully…

i get they wish to keep at least an appearance of neutrality, but there's a lot they could do without directly "taking sides"..

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:28 p.m. No.40621   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0632 >>0635 >>0656

>>40615

>if there is indeed a bread war, who would the warring factions be?

>All the way thru i see just one main actor: OSS

>not two separate groups with, say, different visions of the kitchen or something like that

yup, i agree. but part of its action/nuisance is precisely the multiple IDs/names/personas deployed, to create "enough" of a fog of war to claim war. It's hard to imagine discerning minds still falling for it at this point, but, i dunno…

 

>nutshell

well, as i said, midnightriders provides a de facto experiment. BO came in to nuke OSS who was just stirring shit.

Transparency is somewhat embedded in the kun architecture, as mod actions are logged and can be tracked by anons, even if they can't see content deleted after the fact, unless having an open thread somewhere.

and the legitimacy, well, anons coming over to MR know about the whole dumpsterfire, so they can understand trying a different approach.

and as a leap of faith, come to think of it, i was going to say it's not much more, but it might even be less of a leap of faith than the choiceless "faith" we have to have in FJ to run QR best he can…

it also pretty much worked in the 8bit era, delete/VPNs fights with shills… so, not only can it be done, there is precedent for qresearch

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:38 p.m. No.40638   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>40635

> de facto experiment

oh, i'm seeing this as a good thing - great, even. sorry if unclear.

the forcing anons there spin is indeed dumb, it just exists, as does qr.

agree with shills gonna shill, of course

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:42 p.m. No.40651   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0668

>>40639

ok, but what you don't seem to get is that even if you're just one person, then you must realize YOU ARE AS BAD AS MULTIPLE BOTS HOLYFUCKS SAKE how could you be anon and concerned for the board and mission and cause n all that and be such a spamming, redtexting, lying waste of energy?

 

>>40644

qresear.ch, see your posts. you're all over the last month, at least.

that time you blamed comms for deleting the maps YOU took out was particularly rich

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:49 p.m. No.40662   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0678 >>0684

>>40659

>sauce

oh look at you mastering anon lingo, how impressive

>gaslight

projection, always¸, and the female kind, even

 

your graphics are pure obfuscation.

want sauce?

i'll play

 

>>40118 commsmeta

>got me a Division shill trying hard today:

>

>UK #23 >>11272778

>you got caught fucking with the breads, just like you do here,

> you're "boatfag" from the /comms/ faggot bakers,

> you took our beloved graphics away, and laughed about it,

>graphics that were started within days of Q's first posts, told us to do it, and you tried to trash them,

>you failed faggot, and you failing to trash this bread too

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:53 p.m. No.40676   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0687

>>40668

> I removed the /comms/ links from the dough and then copied over every single file one by one to /qr/ and asked the bread be stickied.

 

=

 

> making shit up.

 

projecting, again.

there isn't a crowd to fool here, there's no need for this.

i know.

 

you did such a SHIT job pasting over the maps after your entire empire crumbled under anon rage that you WOKE UP GMT ANON FROM THE UNDEAD

thanks for that, you disgusting permanent opposite of truth

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:57 p.m. No.40680   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>40678

> avoid any bread

not true, posted in plenty of them

 

>>40678

>Still waiting for your sauce

shit boye, you're lying right here in this thread then, you just found it

 

go on say

<gaslight

<sauce

again

i know you will

 

 

Poe's Law applies, OSS.

you are a shill.

walk like a fuck, talk like a fuck.

you are named with the other shills because you are one of them.

failure to recognize this, only proves it further.

it is beyond obvious.

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 6:05 p.m. No.40691   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0695

>>40682

> you trying to gaslight me

is any anon even attempting to provide accurate testimony, that can be verified by… OTHER ANONS who were right there as well. and others. and others.

 

>>40682

> provide some evidence that I have ever done anything subversive.

again, the more you intervene, the more you provide it yourself

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 6:09 p.m. No.40696   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>40684

>That's when you took out all the comms links wo/thinking of the consequences. Including GMTanons's.

>Tactical error, OSS

this one, OSS. this one alone ruins all your graphics and copypastas.

not only how it happened, but how quickly you lied about it right after, and still do.

 

ALL OF IT is your sauce.

ALL OF IT is you proving day after day your fuckery.

Anonymous ID: e0cf35 Oct. 29, 2020, 6:57 p.m. No.40722   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>40721

it also fed the slide that i don't really engage with OSS on the QR threads, as it's just giving it what it wants and keeping the untidy going, so since she popped over here, might as well give it a chance to speak its mind.

not impressed.