This thread is for the purpose of ID
Get a tripcode and to link your pastebin ID for Baker ID purposes
==
this is my tripcode
a few of my bakes
https://pastebin.com/m543P2B6
https://pastebin.com/pTCCBV5R
https://pastebin.com/0g7DrTft
https://pastebin.com/WY29pix7
https://pastebin.com/V9WxepH6
https://pastebin.com/5MV13zPG
https://pastebin.com/PBcS2Evq
to make a tripcode place your handle / name & password in the Name field
I used Example as name and then a space followed by ###Example as the triple secure password
https://8ch.net/faq.html#what-is-a-tripcode
if you look at tripcodes you notice ! or !! or !!! at the start of the character sequence. this is the security level
using one # to start the password is level 1 and results in !
using two ## results in !!
using Three ### results in !!!
guess which one is the most secure?
3
the single trip is easy to crack (Q had one as bait in the beginning)
the double is possible
the triple is nearly uncrackable
please take notice of the type 8bit uses
>Rusty chose no IDs
IDs change each bread and from board to board...
We're here for the long haul aren't we?
We all have our own ideas of the ethics of baking and the Q movement. I'd like to put down in writing a few things. I'd like us as a group to be able to track bakers breads and help train new ones properly. We've all seen the differences between a tasty bread and a moldy one. I intent to help train bakers that will take pride in their work and produce tasty loaves. We cannot stop the BO from changing the kitchen around but we can help each other to produce the best bread possible.
I set /comms/ up as a practice area and archive. Now I'd like to create a neutral place for discussion between principals. I intend to give all qualified bakers (and some others by invite 8bit, FJ & BVs) BV status here. It will allow anonymous or non anonymous conversations and debates among known peers as not just anyone can post in >>5103
I still need to codify some simple rules essentially about keeping what I've created so far intact so /comms/ isn't burnt to the ground by a rogue subversive member and what exactly it will take to expel a member.
I know famefagging is reason for the boot, board subversion or illegal acts are a few others, I'd like to group to vote on other things I'm sure I haven't thought of yet such as for inclusion in the group and expulsion from it.
My intention is a round table with equal status for all who've been serious contributors to the Q movement
Part of this exercise is accountability, we will remain anon but at least we'll be able to attribute specific actions to specific anons.
I don't really like the idea of a baker's union or baker's guild but lets face it random anon bakers is anarchy and doesn't produce a consistent bread. We cannot lead by fiat, we MUST lead by example.
I doubt we'll have much real influence on FJ & current staff of /qresearch/
But we may have influence on the future of the movement by helping to provide continuity and quality
Bear with me for a moment... it seems you don't have a pastebin account so I have no way to verify that you are the anon who baked, that aside I have no private way to give you a password for the Board Volunteer position which will be needed to post in >>5103
Do you have any suggestions about how I can privately exchange a password with you?
wellโฆ I wouldn't say that
there are tools available to the BO & BVs that help a bit
>pic related
>making the point of the tripfag here essential
the question is to whom?
I want our discussions to be in the public view but with minimum public comment
transparency is greatly lacking in some quarters
I'm currently testing FJ on the statement
anybody can post notables in the proper thread
I tried posting /qrb/ bread #12 into the /qresearch/ notables threadโฆ it got deleted
>don't know which one of the 2 board owners deleted it.
it was FJ or one of the BVs of /qresearch/
OR
all of the BVs, FJ & 8bit are telling the exact same lie, that 8bit 'retired' from QR.
it is possible that FJ & 8bit are sharing the username & password for the Board Owner's position, but I seriously doubt it
I think it's as they've presented it, 8bit gave FJ the password and then FJ has most likely changed it afterward, thus locking 8bit out.
>There are nonetheless some brilliant pieces of work hereโbut also much junk.
that seems to have been the long term plan for the last yearโฆ drown out the valuable information with crap & wild goose chases
drove 8bit away and allowed the FJ crew to achieve total control of /qresearch/
the one good thing I see is JF definitely bit off more than that big mouth can chew and the work load that has been created will eventually overwhelm them.
a twitter famefag as /qresearch/ BO is suspect from the get-go
I'm aware those two were baking for FJ
I have no quarrel with them
thus the offer to delete posts
which is something I don't usually do
transparency is paramount in this endeavor
I'm trying to create a neutral meeting place
I do not wish anybody to be doxed
I will do anything in my power to prevent that
just re-read your post and
>Anons want blood for the change
those are clowns & shills & immature teens
anyone who truly understands the anon thing lives by what is at the top of the breads
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
>The problem comes down to lies and who is lying and who is not.
the crux of the biscuit
I saw and experienced the same 'oh it was a mistake' BS a year ago. there have been subversive activities by some bakers(?) and BVs for more than a year
thus tripcodes here on /comms/
I've always intended for this place to help train bakers and to do that properly accountability is important, being able to distinguish one anon from another, to highlight the 'oh gee that wasn't me who did that' bullshit
I need a way to securely and privately give out some passwords to you folks
if you don't have an anonymous e-mail get one
I've had a proton account for a while now.
I thought I was going to be able to use the messaging feature in pastebin to hand out these passwords but that is not available to me without a PRO account and I don't have one of those.
RustyBShackelfordJr@protonmail.ch
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION!
OPSEC
learn what it means
we are anonymous here
known anonymous but still anonymous
you don't know who I am IRL and I do not want to know who you are we're all safer that way
there are bad actors
never forget that
there are bad actors
if we truly are a threat then it is prudent to remain as anonymous as possible
>when i posted to the qresearch with my name in the name field
lol
I remember when I did that well over a year ago
the next bread was full of anons with Rusty in the name field.
There is a group of anons who dislike namefagging their only point is that it is a halfway step to famefagging.
My point it that without a handle you cannot keep track of authorship... that is... who baked which bread.
Since I was collecting notables and posting them here at /comms/ >>225 I could see quite clearly that there was fuckery going on.
Some of those 'mistakes', possibly most were honest mistakes, however many, many were NOT.
I tried to convince 8bit to allow some form of BAKER ID
8bit set up a strawpoll with the prejudicial title of 'Baker Prestige'
Even with the naming the response was overwhelmingly in favor of some form of ID for bakers.
8bit never did allow baker ID, he couldn't stop bakers from using the pastebin ID, (using a pastebin account to sign the dough) but not many bakers adopted it.
The process of 'vetting' the bakers by BO & BVs did keep the most egregious offenders away from the kitchen but it wasn't effective against the more subtle of the subversives and it created an extra workload for himself and staff.
And now here we are...
we don't want to directly control anyone
we just want some accountability in baking
anarchy isn't a reliable system
are you comfortable with the tripcode you've picked?
I'm about to lock it in
it will be your handle as a BV here on /comms/
you will be able to post in the council thread >>5103
you can post as anon
you can post as BV
you can post as NoLimitAnon !!!YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx
the choice will be yours
but...
all other council members here will know that it's you whenever you post here
your credentials are in the mail
by logging in here on /comms/ as a BV you promise to help anons when you can, be kind whenever possible and not to delete anything.
transparency is paramount going forward
once you've logged on as BV you will be able to post in the locked threads >>5103 etc...
there are a few quirks once you've logged in, you'll see options to do many things, ask and I'll explain.
I locked threads like >>220 & >>283 for obvious reasons
the council thread is locked for slightly different reasons, I want everyone to know who posts on >>5103
you'll go to
https://8ch.net/mod.php
then you'll login using the username and password
then you'll be able to post in the council thread
remember
things posted on the web are forever
not a lot you can do here at /comms/ except to help new bakers if you can
use YOUR best judgement
when the time comes you'll know it and you will be able to post in >>5103
YOU have a voice there.
I have no further instructions for you while I'm wearing my BO of /comms/ hat.
you are a member of the council and we are all equals there.
>Will remain anonymous for now.
I understand
anonymity is important
but what is anonymity?
is it to be totally indistinguishable from the herd?
is 8bit anonymous?
am I (Rusty, /comms/ anon) anonymous?
does having a tripcode or an anonymous e-mail account or an anonymous pastebin account make you less anonymous? not anonymous at all? or just a 'known anon'?
are all anons equal in truthfulness, talents or skills?
I understand the spirit of anon, but the reality is that more than a few anons use that anonymity to talk out of both sides of their faces, they lie.
Ordinarily that is not of any real consequence, but the job of baking is important enough that bad bakes, corrupted bakes, subtly subversive bakes hamper the efforts of the rest of us.
the question all along has been how to work around this
I'm open to any and all suggestions
I've tried to create a neutral place where this can all be discussed and debated and possibly a solution found
ya it did
helped me grow a thicker skin
taught me that I am the only one I must please, I have to live with myself. What others think is their problem. Yes it does feel good to receive approval and it hurts when rejected or ridiculed, but ultimately I have to live with myself.
yes, keep baking as anon
no need or use for ID thereโฆ yet
here it's good to know who said what
ya, I remember a baker who used Jack Burton from Big Trouble in Little China
Real Genius
Grave Yard Baker
Wake N Bake
many bakers have used some form of ID when they baked
you may not understand this, but I will even welcome AFLB here.
All viewpoints are needed in the council
bakers cannot lead by fiat
we must lead by example
>and the answer. Endless keksโฆ..
a well deserved smack down
>>>/qresearch/7076810
>Please revert bread back to original form.
>New structure eliminates / reduces 'hive mind' cataloging & expansion.
>Why change a good thing?
Why change a good thing?
Why indeed?
and then as if FJ couldn't understand a clear message he had to ask about captcha
>>>/qresearch/7076859
>Anons will ask, does this include removing the captcha?
Anons will ask??? LMFAO FJ is such a disingenuous flake
>>>/qresearch/7076919
>Captcha can be easily bypassed by those who would seek to cause disruption.
>Having active serves no purpose.
Having active serves no purpose.
gee... I wonder why it took FJ so long to figure that out
I'd love it if he'd join us here and explain this
it seems the /QRB/ bakers are incompetent or clowns
they can't get the Q posts corrected
I've been after them since last night
>>>/qrb/19289
>>>/qrb/20200
>>>/qrb/20214
>>>/qrb/20220
>>>/qrb/20697
I hate to admit it but FJ may have been close to accurate when he said 80% of the bakers were comp'd (He'd know)
I do find it interesting that so few have come here to discuss this
You YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx
are the only one that's e-mailed to get a BV passcode
magaveli !!!NTZjYWQyNmMyNmIx >>5261
still hasn't
not a fair playing field here until you can see with BV tools just who you're talking with
something similar to this?
>>>/qrb/20697
>>>/qrb/20731
>>>/qrb/20812
>>>/qrb/20913
they don't need to be oldfag
they just need to be competent
>Plz don't division fag. Serves no purpose.
consider me properly chastised
was this you?
>Cease and desist baking for them, let them drop dead from lack of support
talk about division faggingโฆ
>(Besides, your own revisions had to be revised for formattingโplz don't see yourself as above other bakers.)
the length of the black line in the Q posts is the formatting you refer to?
>at least 5 new patriot bakers by the end of the week.
and 50 that were from various intel orginizations as well as private citizens who just like to cause chaos
the problem is to sort the sheep from the wolves in sheep's clothing
we've always needed more bakers
problem was burnout
lack of help from QR staff
outright interference and harassment from QR staff
complete lack of transparency allowed this to happen
8bit was overwhelmed by the task
nobody can do 24 / 7 / 365
butโฆ
8bit wouldn't allow any type of easy bakerID
hence this place
we cannot edit a bake
we cannot control who bakes
but we can lead by example
build a cooperative of bakers
all equals
in communication with each other here, where it's slow and we can do things like schedules etcโฆ
several new bakers on QRB
I'd like to get them here to join the council
I made an invite
oh yaโฆ LOL
I remember some real fun rocks that'd been left in the dough
one of the reasons I made /comms/
needed someplace to test post
helped with body too long error when doing notables etcโฆ
while AFLB was a BV it banned me mid bake on feb 12 last year.
once the ban expired (3 day) I found a few 'rocks'
you have my most sincere appology
you need to realize that I consider myself incompetent to bake
I make too many mistakes
get flustered too easily
cannot keep up once the posting exceeds 15 posts per minute in a breadโฆ
please get a pastebin account
once you've baked and posted a dough from that account e-mail me and I'll give you the keys to the kingdom here
there are some great resources here
a few anons have made threads for deep digging
the nice thing isโฆ here they last as they should
we are making history here
>subject to IRL and board duties kek
yup, here too
>please get a pastebin account
>once you've baked and posted a dough from that account e-mail me and I'll give you the keys to the kingdom here
I'd advise to get the anonymous proton e-mail account 1st
use it to get the pastebin account
bake and post dough from the account
then send me the bread & dough links
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION!
OPSEC
learn what it means
we are anonymous here
known anonymous but still anonymous
you don't know who I am IRL and I do not want to know who you are we're all safer that way
there are bad actors
never forget that
there are bad actors
if we truly are a threat then it is prudent to remain as anonymous as possible
if you've used personal information
like an e-mail address
start over and make a new pastebin account
you can get the proton e-mail anonymously
there are other anonymous e-mail services
once you have the anonymous e-mail you can get the pastebin account
use a handle you like so it's easily to ID
I think of baker ID more as a matter of who can you trust
Authorship and accountability can be used to famefagโฆ and thus it is dangerous as a temptation
not sure how comfortable I'd be having Angel G. here as I do not agree with famefagging
not fond of the system either
but tell me
if you see a dough signed by Rusty or another baker you know does it help ease concerns over 'rocks' ?
yep
you may wish to use ### as the triple hash tripcode (displays beginning with !!!)
is the most secure
if you ever come up with a better system or improvements on the system we're building here, don't hide it, bring it here
I'm always open to new ideas
>I think many people would feel better knowing Cg4563heq1 the solid baker is baking today and FgY7786j32x
or
YjczMGQwNGIzYzQx
YmUwNDJjOTI3MmIx
is baking
ya, my feelings are not to namefag at all
just sign the dough by using your pastebin account
can use it for handoffs too
https://pastebin.com/ueMJmj0S
some oldfag anons and /pol/ anons will object and give you a bit of grief over it, it's a kneejerk reaction to namefag abuses in the past (nassim, etcโฆ)
If you stand your ground and don't abuse it the crap will mostly stop. Shills and others will continue to harass you about it thoughโฆ
just my thoughts
btw
welcome to baking
>The way it has been is the proper way to do this board
it has been an evolution
best practices have evolved
good bakers copy the best practices they see
it's time for a true baker's union / guild whatever you wish to call it. As long as it is open and transparent it will flourish
some good bakers may not join, do not discriminate against them
but soon the bad bakers will be obvious to all and we need do nothing but lead by example
>So anyone who goes by the rules and accepts a ID with comms gets a pass into the baker's council bread where the future will be shaped
yup
it's the anyone part that scares me
bound to get a malicious subversive one eventually
In order to create a fair and neutral playing fieldโฆ
Semper Vigilans
Vincit Omnia Veritas
mea cupla
I'm a rude sumbiotch sometimes
usually accurate tho
vincit omnia veritas
>how could he allow the insanity from his BV's go on and on
one possible explanation is that the job grew quicker than 8bit did
obvious his staff was infiltrated from the get-go
not sure about 8bit's part in all the drama of the last few days
time will tell
I find myself oddly pleased with Q's smackdown of FascistJack
FJ did cause /qrb/ to come to life, so there is at least a small silver lining to that cloud
>Where Rusty says to go or do we do.
please don't
I don't need or want blind obedience
it is fine and proper that you have your own opinion
it is based upon your experiences
all I ask is temper your animosity towards the BOs and let's all try not to do any more harm or contribute to the harm that's been done
be warned
a few meaningless shitposts will be tolerated
if you have nothing to contribute please do not post in this thread, make yer own thread and fill it with whatever you like, multiple shitposts (posts with no contribution to the conversation) will get you banned for a day
>As far as I'm concerned /qresearch is the flagship
agreed
I had a short conversation with a wise anon earlier about cross pollination between boardsโฆ
I now feel it best to keep this to a minimum
adverstising /qrb/ on /qresearch/ will inevitably lead to an influx of bad actors
let's keep /qrb/ clean
/qresearch/ is like starbucks
/qrb/ is like black rifle
two different clientele
good reason to have separate boards, when great finds occur, or seriously notable posts I'd advise to check /qresearch/ notables etc to make sure it hasn't been covered there and then instead of linking to /qrb/ I'd copy a nicely formatted notable post with graphic, tag line and links and post it in the current /qresearch/ bread never telling where it came from
KEK
you're correct,
when I say
all voices are welcome
I really mean all voices within reason
spam isn't welcome
constant shitposting isn't welcome
in general making noise to drown out the conversation isn't welcome
noisy kids will be disciplined
intelligent conversation is welcome
all I ask is that you try to add rather than detract
for the 1st problem 'body too long'
for the 1st page this only happens after adding a bunch of fresh Q posts.
If you do not have a character counter in your text program you can quickly post it in a practice bake in /comms/ (don't make a new thread, just pick any practice bake and post in it) this will immediately tell you if it'll fit or not.
(just don't try this while logged in as a BV on /comms/ or the BV authority will override the body too long error)
and yes, I'd like to see that kind of information posted in the baking school thread >>154 or make another with best practices and hints for new bakers
>Me and doc both used the word "humbling" to describe that experience.
I was baking more than a year ago, when Q did the 'stress test'
Q posted during a Trump rally
posting exceeded 35 posts per minute
bread lasted 28 minutes
burnt me out!
humbling indeed
luckily we had a cadre of good bakers who were helping and I could hand off immediately after baking
I care about the quality of the bread
I value accuracy over the aesthetics of 'it looks good' but I do value both.
sorry, I know of no 'Logan' and the only 'cassandra' I know of is the ancient oracle of Delphi
it's fun reading
I spent time working in a print shop, when you get to the point you can tell lower case type for b & d and p & q apart you've learned to read upside down and backwards without using a mirror
sometimes has very different viewpoint with remarkable insights
another voice that deserves to be heard here
>archived
please elucidate
I understand,
but ask yourself
how better to stop bakers from organizing?
than to harrass anon bakers with the dreaded evil 'baker's union' boogeyman. In truth there was a baker's union and it became 8bits BVs.
the tripcodes and the rest are
so that this is a level playing field
when you're logged in as a BV here you'll be able to see everyone's history of posts here, it helps to see the ones talking out of both sides of their faces.
or if you're like >>5333 and cannot help that IPs change and need to be able to prove ID for continuity of conversation or baking
>I would want to move to "closed session" only in case of emergencies not for regular interactions.
I cannot foresee any circumstance that would cause me to hold a 'closed session'. the council thread is limited and closed in a fashion but posts are visible to all and will always remain so.
just as the board logs and ban list is public and available for view by all.
for view by all with IDs openly displayed. here in this thread anyone can post and there is no requirement for ID so completely anonymous comments (to public appearance) can still be made
you worry me a bit
you remind me of an old joke
two bulls, a young one and an old one are walking thru the pasture
when they crest a rise and see in the valley below them a herd of cows
the young one not being able to contain his enthusiam begins running but quickly notices his older companion isn't. The young bull turns and asks the old one, don't you see those cows?. The old bull replies yes he does, what about it? The young one says I want to run down the hill and fuck one. And the old bull replies I'm going to walk down the hill and fuck them all
I'm much more the walk down the hill type of anon, I make too many mistakes when I rush in quickly
best of luck to you
I've found that these 'shills' are not as easily spotted and categorized as you might think
some of the truly malevolent and subversive ones are exceedingly subtle
the tripcode is for the long haul
things change
boards change
equipment fails
IPs change
etcโฆ
how do you know 8bit is really 8bit?
yup it is my opinion
We may have handed off to each other at one time as I too baked during that era
I only quit baking in QR due to the posting speed. my old equipment and slow internet connection speeds limit me
with 600 posts it can take almost 60 just to refresh the page and the update function is waaaaay slower that can take 2 ~ 3 minutes
so I cannot keep up and do a good job so I don't bake except on rare occasions when it's been slow and no one else was available.
I don't mean to dis you, your intensity bothers me because I know I'll make mistakes and I'd hate to see bad things happen because I said something stupid and someone acted upon it before the stupidity became evident.
time to study some Sun Tzu
I think I can explain, I think I helped cause this
I had grabbed the dough last night to correct the Q post omissions, when I got up this morning I added the notables and revised the doughโฆ
it was not an intentional omission, if you look the last notables bun was posted >>>/qrb/21435 vs when bread #28 >>>/qrb/21439 was posted you'll see it was close.
here's the some of the links in the timeline
>>>/qrb/20681
>>>/qrb/20690
>>>/qrb/20913
>>>/qrb/21425
then addded notables from
>>>/qrb/21410
resulting in
>>>/qrb/21421
that did not include the notables from
>>>/qrb/21435
and the baker used my dough if you compare the notables in bread #27 with
>>>/qrb/21410
> I also see now they were talking back to you and also daring for banning and trolling etc.
ya that was AI anon
I don't mind
but I won't put up with spam or multiple meaningless posts here without letting the offender know of the offense and penalties
no problems anon
wwg1wga
>I do not appreciate the "Cross Polinization" as well and hope it stops
I see two sides to the 'cross pollinization'
a. it will bring the shills, clowns and shitposters and ruin a tranquil place
b. without some form of it there will be much redundancy and it would be a shame if unique findings didn't transfer at all
unique findings 'should' transfer with a speed commensurate with their true importance, that being said important unique findings are likely to be opposed and squashed by opposition forces and it'll be easier if contained on one board only>>5440
>>I do not appreciate the "Cross Polinization" as well and hope it stops
>I see two sides to the 'cross pollinization'
>a. it will bring the shills, clowns and shitposters and ruin a tranquil place
>b. without some form of it there will be much redundancy and it would be a shame if unique findings didn't transfer at all
>unique findings 'should' transfer with a speed commensurate with their true importance, that being said important unique findings are likely to be opposed and squashed by opposition forces and it'll be easier if contained on one board only
>Even though that is my mindset, I will still interact with respect to open dialogues and opinions here. But you knowโฆ I'm paranoid.
I don't believe anything I hear
I only believe half of what I see
heck, sometimes I don't even trust myself
KEK
slight difference between paranoid and prudent
ลขฤงรฆลวฌ
I've been there lending a hand, watching dough editing early this morning
I think the #33a & #33b labeling should work, if all bakers will adopt it.
din't stick around long enough to see how that conversation works out, will check it in the am
other than baking a bit early, things are going very well on QRB
keep up the good work
knowing that you are dealing with a 'known anon' does make it better somehow
human nature I guess
do what you can, with what you have, where you are
wwg1wga
>I just wrote Rusty about re QR
>Rusty, don't know where you stand on some things,
check the tripcode
same same, I've just dropped the 'Rusty'
CTRL-F is your friend
ask me if you want to know my thoughts on any particular subject.
AFAIK none of the bakers or BVs from QR have joined us here.
I do not know what to think about the changes in QR
What I do know is that as long as Q posts there that Q thinks it is still a workable site.
IP hoping shows up
>What does it mean to "join us here"?
here you can have a tripcode or not
use a label, handle, namefagโฆ whatever you wish to call it to ID yourselfโฆ or not
or be as anonymous as possible because there are no UIDs
BO & BVs see the IP hash
I've been granting BV passwords to several bakers who've submitted the data to prove they're bakers.
there are several reasons, for one thing it allows these bakers to get a chance to see what a BV can do, it's only good here on /comms/ and it puts us on equal footing here.
This is a free speech zone
sometimes something less that total anonymity is necessary for continuity of conversation
QR breads happen fast 20 ~ 30 per day
QRB breads happen slow 2 ~ 3 per day
here conversations can take weeks if needed
IRL calls and keeps us from the keyboard from time to time
It takes time to gather all concerned sometimes
and here you can be sure you're talking with the same anon and not an impostor.
I'd cut the cord, there are enough archives
what does need to happen in my opinion, is helper anons monitor QR. When they see a truly notable post instead of making a post in QRB and cross linking the notable, I'd suggest gathering its components, the graphic, the sauce and any text. Possibly upgrading it a bit with digging to improve the sauce, or graphic or text and the posting it whole in QRB.
This will keep QRB abreast of the latest research.
one thing I've noticed
one egregious example is 'eggstein'
when searching the archives for 'epstein' will 'eggstein' show up?
I'm not sure if it's a baker being cutesy or a subtly subversive tactic
easily dismissed as
oh, it's harmless fun
are you sure all other bakers were doing similar stuff because it was funny?
either way it's minor stuff.
I think the bread titles being used on QR is a more serious subject and dangerous tactic.
BTW you don't need to change your pastebin account to do anything here
you should have recieved an e-mail from Rusty B Shacleford Jr. with
username NGIzYzQx
password #########
that will allow you to logon here at /comms/ as a BV
glad to have you aboard
keep up the good work
wwg1wga
I'm sorry, but on this journey you will be exposed to thingsโฆ
things that are deliberately used to warp and control the mind
gore
porn
propaganda of many forms and persuasions
if you're human they have effect
godspeed
wwg1wga
tripcode test